Download presentation
1
Evidence-based medicine:
a hands-on workshop Presented by Chris Maloney, MD Director, Medical Student Education in Pediatrics Venus Wilke, MD Assistant Clerkship Director for Pediatrics University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah Here we can introduce ourselves and make a statement of how we became interested in EBM, how we were “taught” EBM practices and how we have integrated EBM into our practice of medicine and our teaching.
2
Objectives and Priorities
Pediatrics Topics Session 1 and 2 Formulate a clinical question relative to a patient’s problem. Conduct an effective search of the medical literature. Critically read the pediatric literature and apply the information in developing a differential diagnosis, diagnostic plan, or management plan.
3
Clinical judgment and experience Best research evidence EBM Patient values
4
Evidence-based medicine
Defined David L. Sacket Evidence-based Medicine How to practice and teach EBM The integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values
5
EBM: Defined Best research evidence – clinically relevant research into the accuracy and precision of diagnostic tests, the power of prognostic markers, and the efficacy and safety of therapeutic, rehabilitative and preventive regimens. Clinical expertise – the ability to use clinical skills and past experience to rapidly identify each patient’s health state and diagnosis, their individual risks and benefits of potential interventions. Patient’s values – the unique preferences, concerns and expectations each patient brings to a clinical encounter and which must be integrated into clinical decisions if they are to serve the patient.
6
barriers between research and practice
slide 4.2 barriers between research and practice 30 kg of guidelines per family doctor per year 25000 biomedical journals in print 8000 articles published per day 95% of studies cannot reliably guide clinical decisions 2001 Bazian Ltd
7
The steps toward the practice of EBM
Step 1: Converting the need for information to an answerable question. Step 2: Tracking down the best evidence with which to answer the question. Step 3: Critically appraising that evidence for its validity (closeness to the truth), impact (size of the effect), and applicability (usefulness in our clinical practice). Step 4: Integrating the critical appraisal with our clinical expertise and with our patients unique biology, values and circumstances. Step 5: Evaluating our effectiveness and efficiency at achieving steps 1-4 and seeking new ways to improve them both for next time.
8
How evidence changed clinical practice
32. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of Ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1985; 313: 1191 – 1200. 31. Extracranial to intracranial vascular anastomosis for occlusive Cerebrovascular disease: experience in 110 patients. Surgery 1977; 82:
9
systematic review of RCTs
slide 7.1 hierarchy of major study designs systematic review of RCTs interventional RCT observational cohort case control validity 2001 Bazian Ltd
10
Formulating a Question
Foreground Background A B C Novice Experience with the condition Expert
11
Formulating a Question: “Background Information”
Ask for general knowledge about a disorder This question has 2 essential components A question root with a verb (who, what, where, when, how or why) A disorder or an aspect of a disorder
12
Formulating a Question: “Foreground Information”
Ask for specific information about managing a patient with a specific disorder This question has 3 or 4 essential components P – Patient/Population/Problem I – Intervention/Exposure C – Control/Comparison (if relevant) O – Outcome
13
Evidence-based Resources
ACP Journal Club -- articles report original studies and systematic reviews that warrant immediate attention by physicians attempting to keep pace with important advances in internal medicine Clinical Evidence -- from the BMJ Publishing Group; an international source of the best available evidence for effective health care Guidelines -- a public resource for evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Evidence-based Reviews Contains ACP Evidence-based Medicine reviews and Cochrane Library databases Centre for EBM -- this website helps develop, disseminate, and evaluate resources that can be used to practice and teach EBM
14
Major Electronic Resources (available from Eccles Library)
Access Medicine home.aspx A collection of textbooks, hot topics and self-assessment tools: Harrison’s, Goodman and Gilman, etc. Cochrane Library A database of systematic reviews and more DynaMed 1,800 clinical topic summaries; designed for use at point of care, providing best available evidence; updated daily
15
Major Electronic Resources (available from Eccles Library)
PubMed/MEDLINE with LinkOut Buttons indicate if material is available in print or electronic formats STAT!Ref – ACP’s PIER Physicians' Information and Education Resource Plus 23 other textbooks for background information UpToDate Author evaluated review of the best evidence FreeMedicalJournals Promoting free access to medical journals
16
Searching PubMed URL – http://pubmed.gov
With LinkOut (indicates if library has print or electronic copies)
17
Searching PubMed MESH Database Ease of use Mapping of many terms
Explode capability Hierarchical arrangement of terms Ability to limit to the major focus area Can use to broaden a search Can limit to age
18
Searching PubMed MESH Database
19
Searching PubMed MESH Database
20
Searching PubMed Clinical Queries Limits to clinical trials Therapy
Diagnosis Prevention Prognosis Systematic Reviews
21
Searching PubMed
22
Searching PubMed Limits article type age of subjects entrez date
publication date language human or animal subjects subsets gender
23
Searching PubMed
24
Searching PubMed External Linking
25
Searching PubMed Use of quotes vs. no quotes 'brca 1' vs brca 1
Use of wildcards chemotherap* y, ies, eutic with synonyms eradicat* OR cur* OR eliminat* (Note: Use of quotes and wildcard turns off automatic mapping) Use of AND OR NOT e.g. Bronchiolitis AND RSV NOT Influenza [MESH]
26
Levels of Evidence
28
Levels of Evidence
29
General areas covered today
Therapy Harm/Etiology Diagnosis Prognosis
30
One approach to critically selecting an article
1. What is the Authors reputation? 2. What is the Institutions reputation? 3. What is the Type of study? i.e RCT, review 4. What is the Population and how do they compare with my situation? 5. Regardless of the outcome will it change my practice? 6. What are the Methods? 7. What are the Results?
31
Some Statistical Information
32
design features that increase validity
slide 8.1 design features that increase validity 2001 Bazian Ltd
33
Event Rate and Number Needed to Treat
34
Likelihood Ratios
35
Confidence Intervals
36
Group Exercise 1. Working in groups of 2 - 4 2. Identify a question
preferably a foreground question 3. Determine a search strategy 4. Perform the search and obtain an article 5. Critically review the article(s) using the worksheets 6. Share your question, strategy and results
37
References How to practice and teach EBM. Sackett DL, Straus SE,
Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, and Haynes RB. Churchill Livingstone. Second Ed Users guide to the medical literature. A manual for evidence- Based clinical practice. Guyatt G and Rennie D. AMA Press
38
Worksheets
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.