Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPierce Cameron Modified over 9 years ago
1
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study 30/11/10 Fidy A. RAMAMONJISOA University of KwaZulu-Natal Prof Subharthi Ray PhD project supervised by School of Mathematical Science
2
Introduction CMB is a 2.725 K blackbody radiation composing the majority of the radiation of the universe in mm-cm wavelength CMB photons are emitted from the last scattering surface (LSS) at z=1100 (379 000 yrs) Radiation is highly isotropic Temperature fluctuations of the CMB are at 10 -5 level Time Inflation Present CMB observer 10 10 yrs 3x10 5 yrs LSS W. Hu 2002
3
Introduction Polarization first detected by the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) in 2002 Due to Thomson scattering the fluctuations are polarized at 10% level Polarization is decomposed into E-mode (scalar/tensor perturbations due to density fluctuations) B-mode (tensor perturbations due to gravity waves) Colder radiation Hotter radiation W. Hu 2001
4
Stokes parameters CMB polarization are defined by Stokes parameters For CMB photons: V=0, Q and U characterize linear polarization Incident waves Electron Linearly polarized radiation Electric field Mukhanov V. 2005
5
Objectives Find a semi-analytic formulation of the cross power spectra C l TT, C l TE, C l EE, C l BB Compute the cross power spectra using computationally fast pseudo-C l estimator Correct systematic effects due to Non-circularity of instrument beam response Foreground emissions Instrumental noise Multipole C l TT C l TE C l EE C l BB (r=0.1) C l BB (r=10 -4 ) C l BB (lensing) CMB angular power spectra Rosset C. 2005
6
Beam asymmetry Non-circularity of beam assumption is essential at small angular scales ( higher l ) Assume Gaussian window function ( beam ellipticity parameter : deviation of the beam from circularity) C l TT C l TE C l EE Multipole l Planck 100 GHz Errors in power spectrum estimation as a function of beam ellipticity Folsaba et al. 2002
7
Foreground emissions Mask function Instrumental noise Beam function Measured T True T Planck first image Bennett et al. 2003 http://www.scientificamerican.com/media
8
Methodology Decompose Stokes parameters into spin-two harmonics True power spectra Pseudo-C l estimators
9
Methodology The expectation values of pseudo-C l is given by (Mitra et al. 2008) Bias matrix
10
CPU time for caculating C l TT bias matrix 1000 dual core CPUs l max =3000 m beam =2 Preliminary results Expectation values of pseudo-C l estimator for full sky and non-circular beam Mitra et al. (2008) 8 weeks CPU time
11
Preliminary results Limiting case of full sky and non-circular beam Beam distortion parameter Clebsch-Gordon coefficients Wigner-d function Beam function 3j symbol Bias matrix for TE power spectra
12
Bias matrix for EE and BB power spectra Preliminary results Limiting case of full sky and non-circular beam
13
Future works Introduce mask function to account for cut-sky Write codes to compute bias matrix and power spectra Run our codes using CHPC facilities Estimate the covariance matrix errors due to beam asymmetry and incomplete sky coverage Match theory with upcoming Planck data
14
Conclusion Pseudo-C l method provides computationally fast cross power spectra estimation at small angular scale (l max =3000) Systematic effect corrections are crucial for the Planck-like high resolution CMB experiment Detection of B-mode polarization is a direct probe of gravitational waves predicted by inflationary models B-mode polarization detection is challenging
15
References
16
Acknowledgements I acknowledge the South African Square Kilometre Array Project for financial support of this project.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.