Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Introductory Information for Parents, Educators and Community Members Michael Hock Director of Educational Assessment,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Introductory Information for Parents, Educators and Community Members Michael Hock Director of Educational Assessment,"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Introductory Information for Parents, Educators and Community Members Michael Hock Director of Educational Assessment, Vermont Agency of Education

2 Why do we need new tests? Each state bears the burden of test development; no economies of scale Each state pays for its own assessments Students in many states leave high school unprepared for college or career; Limited comparability of results across states Based on state standards Inadequate measures of complex skills and deep understanding. Heavy use of multiple choice Tests cannot be used to inform instruction or affect program decisions Results delivered long after tests are given Difficult to interpret meaning of scores; concerns about access and fairness; Accommodations for special education and ELL students vary Costly, time consuming, and challenging to maintain security Most administered on paper

3 What will be different about the new tests? USED Grant Requirements  Align to Career and College Readiness Standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy  Rigorously assess progress toward “college and career readiness”  Use common cut scores across the Consortium  Provide achievement and growth information  Use assessments that are valid, reliable, and fair for all students (Note: Alternate assessments still needed for small percentage of student)  Use multiple measures of student performance  Use online technologies  Be operational in the 2014-15 school year

4 How will SBAC be different from NECAP? Smarter Balanced NECAP Common Core State StandardsTri-State Grade Expectations On Track to be Career and College Ready Prepared for Next Grade Level Learning Web-BasedPencil and Paper Computer AdaptiveFixed Form/Common Item Set Summative, Interim and FormativeSummative Multiple Choice, Short Answer, Tech Enhanced, Performance Task Multiple Choice, Short Answer, Constructed response 12 Weeks/Spring3 Weeks/ Fall Some Scores Available Immediately; Remainder in About 1 Month About 3 Months Content Standards Achievement Descriptors Test Format Item Delivery Assessment Types Item Types Testing Window Results Turnaround

5 What’s the difference between summative, interim and formative assessments?  Summat ive Assessments are administered at the end of a specific unit or period of learning, generally near the end of a school year. They are designed to “sum up” how much the student has learned over that period of time, and to determine if the student’s achievement is sufficient to meet standards or pre-defined learning expectations.  Interim Assessments are similar to summative assessments in terms of content but are designed to be administered more frequently in order to determine if students are on track to meet end of grade/unit standards, or to provide additional support or mid- course correction if needed.  Formative Assessments are embedded in the day to day, minute to minute interactions between teachers and students. They are used to gauge the pacing of instruction and to determine if students are ready to move on to new material or if they need additional instruction. Formative assessments are often based on strategic questioning strategies, probes, short quizzes or performance events.

6 What’s the new assessment consortium all about? Is it really smarter and more balanced? The purpose of the Consortium is to…  Develop a comprehensive and innovative assessment system for grades 3-8 and high school in English language arts and mathematics aligned to the Common Core State Standards, so that... ...students leave high school prepared for postsecondary success in college or a career through increased student learning and improved teaching  [The assessments shall be operational across Consortium states in the 2014-15 school year]

7  26 member states and territories representing 39% of K-12 students  21 Governing States, 4 Advisory States, 1 Affiliate Member  Washington state is fiscal agent  WestEd provides project management services Who is Smarter Balanced?

8  Secretary Vilaseca has been an active participant in policy level work with his counterparts from the other Smarter Balanced governing states.  Michael Hock is one of eight elected representatives to the Smarter Balanced Executive Committee  Challis Breithaupt is Vermont’s state lead  Peter Drescher is Vermont’s technological readiness coordinator  Mary Ann Minardo is Vermont’s teacher involvement coordinator  Marty Gephart, Gail Taylor and Michael Hock have each co- chaired an SBAC workgroup  UVM College of Education Dean Faynese Miller is Vermont’s high ed lead. UVM literacy expert Sue Biggam participated in creating the SBAC Achievement Level Descriptors. Vermont college faculty has been well represented on the higher council  To date, 21 Vermont educators have participated in one or more Smarter Balanced review committee What is Vermont’s role in the consortium?

9 9 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness All students leave high school college and career ready Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to CCSS; Combine Computer Adaptive and Performance Tasks Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction What’s so “balanced” about Smarter Balanced?

10 What would a "smarter balanced" school year look like? *Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions. Re-take option Optional Interim assessment system— Summative assessment for accountability Last 12 weeks of year* DIGITAL CLEARINGHOUSE of formative tools, processes and exemplars; released items and tasks; model curriculum units; educator training; professional development tools and resources; scorer training modules; and teacher collaboration tools. Scope, sequence, number, and timing of interim assessments locally determined PERFORMANCE TASKS Reading Writing Math END OF YEAR ADAPTIVE ASSESSMENT * Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions. English Language Arts and Mathematics, Grades 3 – 8 and High School Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks BEGINNING OF YEAR END OF YEAR INTERIM ASSESSMENT Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks INTERIM ASSESSMENT

11 What's so special about Computer Adaptive Testing (aka CAT)? Provides accurate measurements of student growth over time Increased precision Item difficulty based on student responses Tailored for Each Student Larger item banks mean that not all students receive the same questions Increased Security Fewer questions compared to fixed form tests Shorter Test Length Turnaround time is significantly reduced Faster Results GMAT, GRE, COMPASS (ACT), Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Mature Technology

12 Is the estimate as accurate as we can make it? How does a CAT work?

13 What is a summative assessment? Summative Assessment (Computer Adaptive)  Assesses the full range of Common Core in English language arts and mathematics for students in grades 3–8 and 11 (interim assessments can be used in grades 9 and 10)  Measures current student achievement and growth across time, showing progress toward college and career readiness  Can be given once or twice a year (mandatory testing window within the last 12 weeks of the instructional year)  Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks

14 What role will performance tasks play?  Extended projects demonstrate real-world writing and analytical skills  May include online research, group projects, presentations  Require 1-2 class periods to complete  Included in both interim and summative assessments  Applicable in all grades being assessed  Evaluated by teachers using consistent scoring rubrics Performance Tasks The use of performance measures has been found to increase the intellectual challenge in classrooms and to support higher- quality teaching. - Linda Darling-Hammond and Frank Adamson, Stanford University “ ”

15 How long are the summative tests? TestGradesCAT Perf. Task Only Total In-Class Activity Total English Language Arts/ Literacy 3-51:302:003:30:304:00 6-81:302:003:30:304:00 112:00 4:00:304:30 Math 3-51:301:002:30:303:00 6-82:001:003:00:303:30 112:001:303:30:304:00 Keep in mind that the new tests will measure more than the current assessments

16 What is an interim assessment? Interim Assessment (Computer Adaptive)  Optional comprehensive and content-cluster assessment to help identify specific needs of each student  Can be administered throughout the year  Provides clear examples of expected performance on Common Core standards  Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks  Aligned to and reported on the same scale as the summative assessments  Fully accessible for instruction and professional development

17 What are formative assessment tools and professional resources? Few initiatives are backed by evidence that they raise achievement. Formative assessment is one of the few approaches proven to make a difference. - Stephanie Hirsh, Learning Forward Digital Professional Development Library  Research-based, on-demand tools and resources for teachers  Aligned to Common Core, focused on increasing student learning and enabling differentiation of instruction  Professional development materials include model units of instruction and publicly released assessment items, formative strategies  Developed by teams of educators from the member states “ ”

18 How will results be reported? Data are only useful if people are able to access, understand and use them… For information to be useful, it must be timely, readily available, and easy to understand. -Data Quality Campaign Online Reporting  Static and dynamic reports, secure and public views  Individual states retain jurisdiction over access and appearance of online reports  Dashboard gives parents, students, practitioners, and policymakers access to assessment information  Graphical display of learning progression status (interim assessment)  Feedback and evaluation mechanism provides surveys, open feedback, and vetting of materials “ ”

19 “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English Language arts and literacy.” “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” “Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.” “Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences.” “Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.” “Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.” Overall Claim for Grades 3-8 Overall Claim for Grade 11 Claim #1 - Reading Claim #2 - Writing Claim #3 - Speaking and Listening Claim #4 - Research/Inquiry What are the English Language Arts reporting areas (aka “claims”)?

20 “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in mathematics.” “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in mathematics.” “Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.” “Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.” “Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.” “Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.” Overall Claim for Grades 3-8 Overall Claim for Grade 11 Claim #1 - Concepts & Procedures Claim #2 - Problem Solving Claim #3 - Communicating Reasoning Claim #4 - Modeling and Data Analysis What are the mathematics reporting areas (aka “claims”)?

21 What supports will be available for special populations? Common- Core Tests to Have Built-in Accommodations - June 8, 2011 “ ” Access by Design  Accurate measures of progress for students with disabilities and English Language Learners  Accessibility and Accommodations Work Group engaged throughout development  Outreach and collaboration with relevant associations  Universal Design  Embedded Digital Accessibility Features

22 22 How will digital technologies improve assessment for special populations? Computer-delivered assessments provide an array of new opportunities to improve the assessment experience for students with special assessment needs, including students with disabilities and ELLs:  An expanded notion of Universal Design  Emphasis on embedded digital accessibility tools that decrease the need for locally provided accommodations  Integration of assessment delivery system with assistive technologies  Vastly improved student engagement

23 23  PRECISE – Unlike fixed form tests, CAT is precise at all ability levels, not just at the proficient cut score  EFFICIENT – Takes less items than fixed form tests to reach a valid and reliable estimate of ability, reducing testing time by as much as 50%; results are available almost immediately.  RESPONSIVE & HUMANE – CAT algorithm produces an individual item set for each student, adapting after each student response; item set comprised of items the student CAN and CAN’T answer in equal proportion  Secure and Adaptable – CAT eliminates most test security concerns of fixed form tests allowing for longer test windows and small group or individualized administrations Does CAT have any special advantages for special students?

24 24 But what about students who don’t have much experience with computer testing? Students will have several opportunities to practice prior to the “official” testing:  Sample items (currently available on Smarter website)  Practice tests (available in spring 2013)  Interim assessment  Pre-assessment tutorials

25 25 http://sampleitems.smarterbalanced.o rg/itempreview/sbac/ELA.htm Showcases the variety of item types: Selected response Constructed response Technology enhanced Performance tasks Sample Items? Can we see some of those?

26 Where can I learn more about Smarter Balanced?  On the web @ www.SmarterBalanced.org www.SmarterBalanced.org  Sign up for the Smarter Balanced e-newsletter  Follow the consortium on Twitter @SmarterBalanced  On the VT AOE web @ http://education.vermont.go v/new/html/sbac.html http://education.vermont.go v/new/html/sbac.html  E-Mail Michael @ Michael.Hock@state.vt.us Michael.Hock@state.vt.us

27 Questions What else would you like to know?


Download ppt "The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Introductory Information for Parents, Educators and Community Members Michael Hock Director of Educational Assessment,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google