Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France."— Presentation transcript:

1 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France July 22, 2010

2 This talk: –  (1D J )       (1S) –  (nS)   (e  e  )  b (1S) –  (3S)      h b (1P) –  (3S)    h b (1P)   b (1S) Overview Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 2/22 BaBar: 1999-2008 122M  (3S) / 100M  (2S)

3 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 2/22 This talk: –  (1D J )       (1S) –  (nS)   (e  e  )  b (1S) –  (3S)      h b (1P) –  (3S)    h b (1P)   b (1S) Overview BaBar: 1999-2008 122M  (3S) / 100M  (2S)

4 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 2/22 This talk: –  (1D J )       (1S) –  (nS)   (e  e  )  b (1S) –  (3S)      h b (1P) –  (3S)    h b (1P)   b (1S) Overview BaBar: 1999-2008 122M  (3S) / 100M  (2S)

5 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 2/22 This talk: –  (1D J )       (1S) –  (nS)   (e  e  )  b (1S) –  (3S)      h b (1P) –  (3S)    h b (1P)   b (1S) Overview BaBar: 1999-2008 122M  (3S) / 100M  (2S)

6 This talk: –  (1D J )       (1S) –  (nS)   (e  e  )  b (1S) –  (3S)      h b (1P) –  (3S)    h b (1P)   b (1S) Overview Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 2/22 BaBar: 1999-2008 122M  (3S) / 100M  (2S)

7  (1D J ) Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 3/22

8 Expected  (1D J=1,2,3 ) properties –m  (1D J ) ~10160 MeV/c 2, m  (1D  J ) ~5-12 MeV/c 2,   (1D J ) ~30 keV Experimental observation –  (3S)   (1D 2? )   (1S)   l  l  –B (  (3S)   l  l  ) = (2.5 ± 0.5 ± 0.5)  10 -5 –m  (1D 2? ) = 10161.1 ± 0.6 ± 1.6 MeV/c 2 No evidence for  (1D J )       (1S) –Limit: B (  (1D J )       (1S)) < 4% –Theory: Kuang & Yan ~40%, Ko ~2%, Moxhay ~0.25%  (1D J ): General Information Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 4/22

9 Reconstruct  (3S)   (1D J )       (1S)      l  l  –Require exactly 4 tracks –m l  l  consistent with / constrained to m  (1S) –Minimize E   2 to select best candidate –m  (1D J ) resolution ~ 3 MeV/c 2 Maximum Likelihood fit to m     l  l  spectrum –  (1D J ) signals: Double Gaussian + Crystal Ball –Monte Carlo (MC)-determined backgrounds:  (3S)   bJ (2P)   (     or       )  (1S)  (3S)       (1S) +  FSR  (3S)   (       )  (1S)  (3S)   /      (2S) (      (1S))  (1D J ): BaBar Analysis Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 5/22

10 m  (1D 2 ) = 10164.5 ± 0.8 ± 0.6 MeV/c 2  (1D J ): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 6/22

11  (1D J ): Quantum Numbers Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 7/22 –L:     invariant mass P(  2 ) for m     distribution D(84.6%), S(3.1%), P(0.3%) –J:  Helicity Angle dN/d(cos   ) ~ 1 +  (3cos 2   -1)/2  = -1.0±0.4±0.1 consistent w. J = 2 –J P : Angle between     and l  l  planes dN/d  ~ 1 +  cos(2  ), sign(  ) = (-1) J P  = -0.4±0.3±0.1 consistent w. J P = 2 

12 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 8/22  b (1S)

13  b (1S) observed in inclusive  spectrum for  (3S) and  (2S) Measured properties – B (  (3,2S)   b (1S)) = (5.1 ± 0.7)  10 -4 / (3.9 ± 1.5)  10 -4 –m  b (1S) = 9390.9 ± 2.8 MeV/c 2,   b (1S)  10 MeV –(m  (1S) – m  b (1S) ) = 69.3 ± 2.8 MeV/c 2 Hyperfine splitting theoretical predictions –Lattice: ~50-60 MeV/c 2 NRQCD: ~40 MeV/c 2  b (1S): General Information Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 9/22

14 Converted photons (   e  e  ) improve resolution (25  5 MeV) –Fit pair of tracks, selected with  2 fitter, m ,   –Additional cuts: |cos  thrust |, N tracks,    veto Simultaneous fit to E   spectrum in  (3S) and  (2S) datasets –  (3,2S)    b (1S): Breit-Wigner  Crystal Ball –e   e  E=m  (nS)   ISR  (1S): Crystal Ball –  bJ (2,1P)    (1S): Doppler broadening  Crystal Ball –Background: 4 th order polynomial  exponential decay  b (1S): Converted Photon Analysis Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 10/22

15  b (1S): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 11/22

16 E   and branching fractions as expected Mass-constrained fit: –No evidence for  b (2.3  stat.) Best fit result in m  b (1S) region: –Differs by +12.4 +3.8 -4.0 MeV/c 2 (3.3  stat., 2.6  w. syst.)   e  e  : Results Summary Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 12/22

17 Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 13/22 h b (1P)

18 Expect m h b (1P) = (m  b0 (1P) +3m  b1 (1P) +5m  b2 (1P) ) / 9  9900 MeV/c 2 Production mechanisms –B (  (3S)      h b (1P)) ~ 10 -3 – 10 -2 –B (  (3S)    h b (1P)) ~ 10 -3 –R(   h b (1P) /     h b (1P)) = 0.05 – 20 Expected decays –h b (1P)  ggg (57%),  b (1S) (41%),  gg (2%) Previous searches –B (  (3S)      h b (1P)) < 1.8  10 -3 –B (  (3S)    h b (1P)) < 2.8  10 -3 h b (1P): General Information Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 14/22

19 Reconstruct pair of oppositely charged tracks –Cuts on E total, R 2, N tracks, K S  veto (flight length, cos  ) Define     recoil mass: m R 2 = (m  (3S) – E      ) 2 – P      2  2 fit to m R with 7 components –h b signal: Symmetric two-sided Crystal Ball (TCB) –  (3S)       (2S): Asymmetric TCB + Bifurcated Gaussian –  (2S)       (1S): same, with fixed feed-down components –  b1,2 (2P)       b1,2 (1P): TCB, with fixed peak position –K S       : MC-determined phase space –Non-peaking background: 6 th order Chebychev polynomial     h b (1P): Analysis Strategy Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 15/22

20     h b (1P): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 16/22

21     h b (1P): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 17/22

22 No evidence for h b signal at m h b = 9900 MeV/c 2 –B (  (3S)      h b (1P)) = (0.0 ± 0.5 ± 0.3)  10 -4 (<1  10 -4 UL) Most significant scan point <2  significance Exclude B (  (3S)     h b (1P)) > 2.5  10 -4 (90% CL) over range     h b (1P): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 18/22

23 Reconstruct   (     ) +  –Require E  consistent with h b (1P)   b (1S) –Cuts on N tracks, R 2,   veto (all  candidates),   cos  h Define   missing mass: m.m.(   ) 2 = (m  (3S) – E    ) 2 – P    2 –Constrain m   to improve resolution –N   from m     fit in each m.m.(   ) bin  2 fit of m.m.(   ) distribution –h b (1P) signal: Double Crystal Ball –Background: 6 th order polynomial, from reweighted MC   h b (1P): Analysis Strategy Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 19/22

24   h b (1P): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 20/22

25 Fixed mass fit: –B (  (3S)   h b (1P)    b (1S)) = (3.1±1.1±0.4)  10 -4 (2.7  ) –1.5  10 -4 < B (  (3S)   h b (1P)    b (1S)) < 4.9  10 -4 Best fit m h b = 9903 ± 4 ± 1 MeV/c 2 consistent with predictions Combined results: –R(   h b (1P) /     h b (1P)) > 3.2 (>1.5 for m h b = 9903 MeV/c 2 )   h b (1P): Fit Results Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 21/22

26  (1D J )       (1S) –First observation of  (1D J ) hadronic decays –Quantum numbers and precise m  (1D 2 ) measurement  (2,3S) converted photon spectrum –Most significant (2.6  ) “  b ” signal at 9403.3±2.4 +0.9 -1.5 MeV/c 2 –Improved and first direct  bJ (1,2P)    (1S) measurement h b (1P) Search –No evidence for  (3S)      h b (1P) –Marginal evidence (2.7  ) for  (3S)    h b (1P)     b (1S) – B (  (3S)   h b (1P)) / B (  (3S)     h b (1P)) > 1 at 90% C.L. Summary Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar / Bryan Fulsom / ICHEP / 2010.07.22 / Page 22/22

27 FIN


Download ppt "Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google