Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAustin French Modified over 9 years ago
1
Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine www.medev.ac.uk1
2
Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine www.medev.ac.uk Giving feedback Tools of the Trade 21 st November University of Leicester Dr Adrian Hastings and Dr Rhona Knight
3
www.medev.ac.uk What is in the handout? Why bother with feedback? What is feedback? Key features of feedback General principles of feedback –Types –Guidelines A feedback toolbox Useful pre and post course reading
4
www.medev.ac.uk Why bother with feedback?
5
www.medev.ac.uk Why bother? ‘Feedback, or knowledge of results, is the lifeblood of learning.’ Rowntree D (1982) Educational Technology in Curriculum Development (2e). Paul Chapman Publishing, London. ‘Feedback is an essential component of education and adult learning.’ Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002:77, 1185-8.
6
www.medev.ac.uk Why bother? It works: –improves learning outcomes –better marks in assessments –better results in other learning situations –deepens approach to learning –encourages active pursuit of understanding and application of knowledge Black P and William D (1998) Assessment and classroom teaching. Assessment in education 5:7-73. Rolfe I and McPherson J (1995) Formative assessment: How am I doing? Lancet 385:837-9.
7
www.medev.ac.uk What is it?
8
www.medev.ac.uk What is it? ‘A two-way process in which an educational supervisor or group appropriately share with the learner information based on observation, with the aim of reaching a defined goal.’ Knight R. The Good Consultation Guide for Nurses, Radcliffe 2006.
9
www.medev.ac.uk Key features of feedback
10
www.medev.ac.uk Key features? Challenge Support
11
www.medev.ac.uk General principles of feedback
12
www.medev.ac.uk Types of feedback Brief feedback Formal feedback Major feedback
13
www.medev.ac.uk TEAM Guidelines T iming E nvironment A ppropriate Manageable
14
www.medev.ac.uk A feedback toolbox
15
www.medev.ac.uk A selection of tools Tool 1: Pendleton’s ‘Rules’ Tool 2: Calgary - Cambridge Tool 3: Non-judgemental feedback Tool 4: Observation versus deduction Tool 5: Pi Tool 6: PEE Tool 7: Unacceptable behaviour
16
www.medev.ac.uk 1. Pendelton’s ‘rules’
17
www.medev.ac.uk 1.Pendleton’s ‘Rules’ (Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The New Consultation. Oxford University, 2004.) The learner goes first and performs the activity Questions then allowed only on points of clarification of fact The learner then says what they thought was done well The teacher then says what they thought was done well The learner then says what was not done so well, and could be improved upon The teacher then says what was not done so well and suggests ways for improvements, with discussion in a helpful and constructive manner
18
www.medev.ac.uk 2. ‘Calgary – Cambridge’
19
www.medev.ac.uk SET-GO (Silverman et al.) What I Saw What Else did you see? What does the learner Think? What Goal are we trying to achieve? Any Offers on how we should get there?
20
www.medev.ac.uk ALOBA (Silverman et al.) A genda L ed O utcome B ased A nalysis
21
www.medev.ac.uk 3. Non-judgemental feedback
22
www.medev.ac.uk Non-judgemental feedback Based on description ‘Communication skills are neither intrinsically good nor bad, they are just helpful, or not helpful, in achieving a particular objective in a given situation’ –Silverman et al
23
www.medev.ac.uk What is it? Evaluative/judgemental –The beginning was awful, you just seemed to ignore her. –The beginning was excellent - great stuff!! Descriptive –At the beginning you were looking at the notes, which prevented eye contact. –At the beginning you gave her your full attention and never lost eye contact – your facial expression registered your interest in what she was saying.
24
www.medev.ac.uk 4. Observation vs deduction
25
www.medev.ac.uk Observation versus deduction Separate behaviour and interpretation Make interpretations tentative I noticed at this stage that you moved more in your seat, and your face became red, I wondered if you might be embarrassed?
26
www.medev.ac.uk 5. Pi ( ) – Point / Illustration
27
www.medev.ac.uk Pi ( ) – Point / Illustration Make sure that the student knows what you’re talking about! As well as a label, give an example Point Illustration
28
www.medev.ac.uk 6. PEE – point / explanation / example
29
www.medev.ac.uk PEE – point / explanation / example Make sure that the student knows what you’re talking about! As well as a label, give a reason and an example Point Explanation Example
30
www.medev.ac.uk 7. Unacceptable behaviour
31
www.medev.ac.uk 7. Unacceptable behaviour (West Midlands modular trainers’ course, 2003) 1. Check person is OK before you start 2. Use a wake-up, warning phrase: “There’s something very serious I have to say” 3. Say, very simply, what is not right 4. Give an example as appropriate 5. Relax the tone to allow for a positive response usually an offer to improve ensues 6. Respond to offer positively but define specific, measurable outcomes 7. Do not be drawn into discussion on –justification of behaviour –your right to judge 8. Most of us take criticism better if it is not personal. –“Maybe what I did was not good – but it doesn’t mean I’m no good.” –Make sure that the student can see this distinction too
32
www.medev.ac.uk Summary
33
www.medev.ac.uk Good feedback is Suited to purpose Specific Directed towards behaviour rather than personality Checked with the recipient Problem solving A suggestion rather than prescriptive
34
www.medev.ac.uk TEAM Guidelines T iming E nvironment A ppropriate M anageable
35
www.medev.ac.uk Useful further reading: Teaching made easy Chambers and Wall Radcliffe 2000 ISBN: 1-85775-373-9 Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine Kurtz, Silverman and Draper Radcliffe 1998 ISBN: 1-85775-272-2 Adult and continuing education Jarvis Routledge 1995 ISBN: 0-415-10242-1 The Good Consultation Guide for Nurses Hastings and Redsell (eds) Radcliffe 2006 ISBN: 1-85775-688-6
36
www.medev.ac.uk Useful pre-course reading Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983:250,777-81 –http://www.utmb.edu/surgery/clerks/feedback.htmhttp://www.utmb.edu/surgery/clerks/feedback.htm Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz SM. The Calgary – Cambridge approach to communications skills teaching 1: Agenda led outcome based analysis of the consultation. Educ Gen Prac.1996; 7, 288-99 Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz SM. The Calgary –Cambridge approach to communications skills teaching 2: SET-GO method of descriptive feedback. Educ Gen Prac.1996; 8, 16-23
37
www.medev.ac.uk
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.