Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPeregrine Payne Modified over 9 years ago
1
Ariel Rosenfeld, Amos Azaria, Sarit Kraus, Claudia V. Goldman, Omer Tsimhoni Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
2
CCS reduces ~10% of the car’s power efficiency! Reduced ecological footprint. Extending travel distance of EV. Economically efficient. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
3
Driver’s and system’s goals are partially conflicting. Let’s minimize energy consumption... I’m Hot! Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
4
Repeated interaction Drivers’ preferences. Long-term effect of advice. Changing environment. Estimating expected energy consumption. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
6
Advice Controls Effects Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015 Agent Effects Goal: minimize the accumulative energy consumption.
7
CCS model. Drivers model. Environment model. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
8
Collected 120 10-min energy consumption measurements. e(T, F, D, M, E, I) = (w 1 T + w 2 F + w 3 D + w 4 E + w 5 I) ((1 + w 6 ) M) T = Temperature F = Fan D = Direction M = Mode E = External temperature I= Internal temperature Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
9
We recruited 38 subjects. (not that easy!) Each subject spent 30 min. in the car, simulating 3 different trips. Subjects were presented with different advice. ML algorithm for extracting probabilities: Drivers likelihood to accept an advice Car’s condition likelihood to change. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
11
~80% of drivers explicitly accepted. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
12
78% accuracy (post-hoc). Influential Features: Current internal temperature. Change from current setting (Reference point). % of accepted advice (Trust). Saving percentage (Expectation bias). Not influential: External temperature. Average temperatures\fan. Accepted deltas. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
13
Optimization: Where: Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
14
MDP Uses the predictions for the transition function. State of the art – SAP (Azaria et al. 2012) Considers the Social Utility of advice. The weight provides a trade-off between short and long term gain. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
15
45 drivers - 15 per condition, 3 rounds. The lower the better. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
16
SAP was aggressive. Some subjects stopped clicking on the advice. AgentAvg. go eco %Avg. save %Avg. consumption MACS0.83523.10.174 SAP agent 0.64133.70.237 Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
17
Presented MACS: an agent for providing advice for climate control systems. Machine model. Human model. Environment model. Finding the balance. Human vs. Machine Trust vs. savings. Modifying drivers’ behavior. Advising Policy. Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
18
Ariel Rosenfeld: arielros1@gmail.com Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 workshop) @ Austin, TX USA. January 2015
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.