1. Parafoveal Processing Influences Word Frequency & Predictability Effects on Eye Movements during Reading University of Glasgow (est. 1451) Glasgow Language Processing

2. Christopher Hand Sébastien Miellet Paddy O’Donnell

3. Graham Scott Emotion Word Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements Scott, O’Donnell, & Sereno

5. Frequency & Predictability Word frequency –High-frequency (HF) words are read more quickly than low-frequency (LF) words. –A word frequency effect (HF<LF) is used as a marker (index) of successful word recognition (lexical access). Contextual Predictability –Given a prior context, words that are highly predictable (HP) from context are read more quickly than those that are less predictable (LP). –The temporal locus of predictability effects, lexical (interactive) or post-lexical (modular), is a matter of continued debate.

6. Freq X Pred: Early RT Studies Additive Interactive or Target ConditionContext HF LF Congruous The skier was buried in the… Incongruous The bodyguard drove the… snowavalanche snow avalanche

7. Target ConditionContext HF LF Biasing Flying to its nest was a… Neutral To our surprise we saw a… bird hawk Freq X Pred: ERP Study Sereno, Brewer, O’Donnell (2003) N1 component: 132-192 ms

8. Freq X Pred: Eye Movements Altarriba, Kroll, Sholl, & Rayner (1996) Lavinge, Vitu, & d’Ydewalle (2000) Rayner, Binder, Ashby, & Pollatsek (2001) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rayner, Ashby, Pollatsek, & Reichle (2004) Miellet, Sparrow, & Sereno (in press) Inhoff (1984)

9. Freq X Pred: Eye Movements Altarriba, Kroll, Sholl, & Rayner (1996) Lavinge, Vitu, & d’Ydewalle (2000) Rayner, Binder, Ashby, & Pollatsek (2001) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rayner, Ashby, Pollatsek, & Reichle (2004) Miellet, Sparrow, & Sereno (in press) Inhoff (1984)

10. Freq X Pred: Eye Movements Altarriba, Kroll, Sholl, & Rayner (1996) Lavigne, Vitu, & d’Ydewalle (2000) Rayner, Binder, Ashby, & Pollatsek (2001) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rayner, Ashby, Pollatsek, & Reichle (2004) Miellet, Sparrow, & Sereno (in press) Inhoff (1984) conducted en français

11. carrots Bugs Bunny eats lots of carrots to stay healthy. potatoes June Cleaver always serves meat and potatoes for dinner. LF HF High Predictability carrots June Cleaver always serves meat and carrots for dinner. potatoes Bugs Bunny eats lots of potatoes to stay healthy. LF HF Low Predictability Rayner et al. (2004)

12. Limitations Remedies Items per condition: 8 Targets embedded in: single sentence Length of context (# pre-target words): 7.7 words 22 15.5 2 nd of 2 sentences

13. carrots Bugs Bunny eats lots of carrots to stay healthy. potatoes June Cleaver always serves meat and potatoes for dinner. carrots June Cleaver always serves meat and carrots for dinner. potatoes Bugs Bunny eats lots of potatoes to stay healthy. LF HF High Predictability Low Predictability

14. Although a rugby player, Clive struggled through the crowd lager at the bar carrying glasses of lager and bags of crisps. Gillian was on the last mile of the women’s marathon. She water grabbed a bottle of water from a spectator and drank it. Gillian was on the last mile of the women’s marathon. She lager grabbed a bottle of lager from a spectator and drank it. Although a rugby player, Clive struggled through the crowd water at the bar carrying glasses of water and bags of crisps. LF HF High Predictability Low Predictability

15. Ingrid’s boiler had suddenly broken down. Fortunately, her plumber neighbour’s father was a plumber and would be able to help. Callum was having trouble with his homework. He asked his teacher uncle who was a teacher to help him with the assignment. Callum was having trouble with his homework. He asked his plumber uncle who was a plumber to help him with the assignment. Ingrid’s boiler had suddenly broken down. Fortunately, her teacher neighbour’s father was a teacher and would be able to help. LF HF High Predictability Low Predictability

16. Method Materials & Design: Frequency (HF,LF) x Predictability (HP,LP) HF & LF targets matched pair-wise on word length (mean = 5.84 letters; range: 5-8 letters) HF LF HP LP HP LP Frequency (BNC, per million) 145 145 4 4 Predictability (1-7) 6.19 4.07 6.11 3.69 Cloze probability.57.02.50.01 # of items 22 22 22 22

17. Method Materials & Design: Frequency (HF,LF) x Predictability (HP,LP) HF & LF targets matched pair-wise on word length (mean = 5.84 letters; range: 5-8 letters) HF LF HP LP HP LP Frequency (BNC, per million) 145 145 4 4 Predictability (1-7) 6.19 4.07 6.11 3.69 Cloze probability.57.02.50.01 # of items 22 22 22 22

18. Method Participants: 64 (mean age = 22; #F = 47) Apparatus: –Dual-Purkinje Eyetracker (Gen 5.5) –4 characters ≈ 1 o of visual angle Procedure: –88 experimental passages –Yes/No comprehension questions on half the trials WOW!

19. Results: Fixation Time Measures Early –First fixation duration (FFD) –Single fixation duration (SFD) –Gaze duration (GD) Later –Next forward-going fixation after target (‘spillover’) –Total Fixation Time (TT) reject 4% skip21% 1 fix63% 2+ fix12%

20. 26 ms 9 ms

21. Just then, a smug grin comes over his face… Ha! Told you so!

22. In reading, words are initially processed parafoveally before they are directly foveated. Prior research indicates that both the frequency and predictability of the parafoveal word can influence its subsequent fixation duration. Specifically, –HF parafoveal words are subsequently fixated for less time than LF ones (Inhoff & Rayner, 1986). –HP parafoveal words are subsequently fixated for less time than LP ones (Balota, Pollatsek, & Rayner, 1985). Parafoveal Pre-Processing

23. The sore on Tam-Tam’s rump was swollen. invisible boundary **** *** Boundary Technique The sore on Tam-Tam’s tnam was swollen. invalid parafoveal preview

24. water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 1-3 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 7-9 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 4-6 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 10-12 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 13+ Launch Distance

25. (Poorly) Simulated Perceptual Span water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 10-12 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 4-6 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 7-9 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 1-3 water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… 13+

26. 1-3 (16%) 4-6 (24%) 7-9 (21%) 10-12 (10%) 13+ (5%) skips (21%) rejected (4%) (15%) (21%) (17%) (6%) (4%)

27. #items #subjects #conditions per cond# data points 64 x 4 x 22 = 5632

29. Low High Predictability 7-9 Low High Predictability 4-6 Low High Predictability 1-3 Launch Distance from Target (# letters)

30. RT studies, in general, find that word frequency and contextual predictability interact. Eye movement studies, measuring target word fixation time in normal reading, find that frequency and predictability are additive. When the amount of parafoveal preview is manipulated (post-hoc via launch distance), however, different patterns of data emerge. Summary of Results

31. Specifically, Fixation duration vs. RT? –Far condition ≈ RT physically, but not behaviorally –Near condition ≈ RT behaviorally, but not physically Launch distanceFreq Pred FxP Far (7-9) HF Mid (4-6) HF HFLFHFLF Near (1-3) HF,LF HF<LF

32. Apparent additive effect of Freq & Pred in reading is comprised of opposing interactive effects. Conclusions LP HP 7-9 Launch Distance from Target (# letters) LP HP 4-6 LP HP 1-3

33. Explanation 1: Frequency First Conclusions

34. Explanation 2: Floors & Ceilings Conclusions LP HP 7-9 Launch Distance from Target (# letters) LP HP 4-6 LP HP 1-3

35. Launch Site Conclusions Used as a tool to capture the temporal dynamics of parafoveal processing. – Demonstrated sensitivity to the temporal & spatial contingencies intrinsic to reading. – Provides a more fluid or transitional account of concurrent oculomotor and linguistic processing. –

36. Thank y’all

38. “Parafoveal-on-foveal” effects ( oh no! ): –When the ease or difficulty in processing a parafoveal target initially manifests itself on the current, pre-target fixation. Effects Before the Target? water …grabbed a bottle of water from a… location of current, pre-target fixation

39. 4 ms (marg.) 6 ms (p<.01)

40. Low High Predictability 7-9 Low High Predictability 4-6 Low High Predictability 1-3 Launch Distance from Target (# letters)

41. Low High Predictability 7-9 Low High Predictability 4-6 Low High Predictability 1-3 Launch Distance from Target (# letters)

42. Low High Predictability 7-9 Low High Predictability 4-6 Low High Predictability 1-3 Launch Distance from Target (# letters)

43. Low High Predictability 7-9 Low High Predictability 4-6 Low High Predictability 1-3 Launch Distance from Target (# letters)

44. Effects:F 1 F 2 Freq****** Pred****** FxPmargn.s.

46. Effects:F 1 F 2 Freqn.s. n.s. Predmarg.n.s. FxP**marg.