1. Research Ethics and Structuring Inquiry

2. Ethics and Politics of Research Ethics deals with methods used in research. Ethics deals with methods used in research. Politics deals with representation of research. Politics deals with representation of research. James Colemen and School Desegregation James Colemen and School Desegregation Eminent sociologist who found little difference in the academic performance of African-Americans in integrated vs. segregated schools Eminent sociologist who found little difference in the academic performance of African-Americans in integrated vs. segregated schools Instead family and neighborhood mattered most Instead family and neighborhood mattered most Controversy and misrepresentation Controversy and misrepresentation

3. Ethics in Social Research Voluntary participation. Voluntary participation. No harm to participants. No harm to participants. Voluntary participation is based on a full understanding of possible risks. Voluntary participation is based on a full understanding of possible risks. Anonymity and confidentiality. Anonymity and confidentiality.

4. Ethics in Social Research Deception Deception Needs to be justified by compelling scientific or administrative concerns. Needs to be justified by compelling scientific or administrative concerns. Debriefing session or procedure Debriefing session or procedure Analysis and Reporting Analysis and Reporting Researchers must be honest about their findings and research. Researchers must be honest about their findings and research.

5. Ethics in Social Research Institutional Review Boards Institutional Review Boards Review research proposals involving humans so they can guarantee the rights and interests are protected. Review research proposals involving humans so they can guarantee the rights and interests are protected. Professional Codes of Ethics Professional Codes of Ethics Most professional associations have formal codes of conduct that describe acceptable and unacceptable professional behavior. Most professional associations have formal codes of conduct that describe acceptable and unacceptable professional behavior.

6. Ethical Controversy: Tearooms Study of homosexual behavior in public restrooms Study of homosexual behavior in public restrooms Lied to participants by telling them he was a “watchqueen” Lied to participants by telling them he was a “watchqueen” Traced participants to their home and interviewed them under false pretenses Traced participants to their home and interviewed them under false pretenses Invasion of privacy? Invasion of privacy? Deception of respondents? Deception of respondents?

7. Ethical Controversy: Milgram Study of human obedience. Study of human obedience. Subjects had role of "teacher" and administered a shock to "pupils". Subjects had role of "teacher" and administered a shock to "pupils". Pupils were actually part of the experiment. Pupils were actually part of the experiment. Act out the effects of progressively higher “shocks” Act out the effects of progressively higher “shocks” Two-third continue to the highest level Two-third continue to the highest level “teachers” express great discomfort “teachers” express great discomfort

8. Group Exercise Would you use research insights gained from research conducted in violation of ethical guidelines? Would you use research insights gained from research conducted in violation of ethical guidelines? Ex., Tuskegee Airman Studies Ex., Tuskegee Airman Studies Ex., Nazi War Experiments Ex., Nazi War Experiments Would you conduct a study that did not get IRB approval if you thought the topic was important? Would you conduct a study that did not get IRB approval if you thought the topic was important? Ex. Public responses to major news event Ex. Public responses to major news event Ex. Studying the health effects of an oil spill Ex. Studying the health effects of an oil spill

9. Nature of Inquiry What question are you trying to answer? What question are you trying to answer? Pick the appropriate approach Pick the appropriate approach Do you want to explain one case fully or understand a class of cases? Do you want to explain one case fully or understand a class of cases? Different approaches with different goals Different approaches with different goals

10. Idiographic vs. Nomothetic Two ends of a continuum of inquiry Two ends of a continuum of inquiry The Idiographic Orientation The Idiographic Orientation Unique characteristics of phenomena: Unique characteristics of phenomena: Rich description of “idiosyncratic” features Rich description of “idiosyncratic” features Intention is to explain one case fully Intention is to explain one case fully The Nomothetic Orientation The Nomothetic Orientation Generating generalizable principles Generating generalizable principles Establishing “trans-situational” laws Establishing “trans-situational” laws Intention is to explain a class Intention is to explain a class

11. Inductive Reasoning Moves from the particular to the general Moves from the particular to the general Observations lead to generalizations Observations lead to generalizations Exploratory investigation Exploratory investigation E.g., Identifying news frames through ethnographic study of newsroom culture and news production practices E.g., Identifying news frames through ethnographic study of newsroom culture and news production practices Identifying frames as you encounter them Identifying frames as you encounter them

12. Deductive Reasoning Moves from the general to the particular Moves from the general to the particular General principles lead to expectations for empirical testing General principles lead to expectations for empirical testing Theory testing investigation Theory testing investigation E.g., Using theories of news production to: E.g., Using theories of news production to: Predict certain frames will occur more frequently Predict certain frames will occur more frequently Episodic over thematic framing (Iyengar’s research) Episodic over thematic framing (Iyengar’s research)

13. Wallace’s Wheel of Science Theories Empirical Generalizations Hypotheses Observations INDUCTION DEDUCTION CONCRETE ABSTRACT

14. Creating Explanations Research often seeks explanations by: Research often seeks explanations by: examining relationships between variables examining relationships between variables E.g. Is gender related to party preference? E.g. Is gender related to party preference? E.g. Is education related to prejudice? E.g. Is education related to prejudice? E.g. Is political discussion related to civic participation? E.g. Is political discussion related to civic participation?

15. Conditions of Causality: Covariation Covariation Correspondence between cause and effect Correspondence between cause and effect Positive or negative covariation Positive or negative covariation Time-order Time-order Cause must precede effect Cause must precede effect Absence of third variables Absence of third variables Spurious relationships Spurious relationships

16. Spurious Relationships Situations where X and Y appear to be related: Situations where X and Y appear to be related: But are really the function of third variable Z But are really the function of third variable Z 1. Antecedent variable 1. Antecedent variable Z causes both X and Y Z causes both X and Y 2. Intervening variable 2. Intervening variable X causes Z, Z causes X X causes Z, Z causes X Causation is rarely as simple as X causing Y Causation is rarely as simple as X causing Y Multitude of factors cause Y Multitude of factors cause Y Contribute in varying amounts Contribute in varying amounts

17. Necessary & Sufficient Causes Necessary Cause: Necessary Cause: For Y to occur, X must occur first For Y to occur, X must occur first Just because X occurs, doesn’t mean Y will occur Just because X occurs, doesn’t mean Y will occur Other factors may have to occur too Other factors may have to occur too To pass the test, you must take the test To pass the test, you must take the test Sufficient Cause: Sufficient Cause: If X occurs, Y will occur If X occurs, Y will occur X determines Y, no contingencies X determines Y, no contingencies Other factors may also have the effect Other factors may also have the effect If you skip an exam, you fail the exam If you skip an exam, you fail the exam