Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDuane Pierce Modified over 9 years ago
1
MARCILIA DYAH AYU KUMALA, 2201404590 TEACHING NARRATIVE WRITING FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH ANIMATED FILM (An Action Research Conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Mlonggo Jepara in the Academic Year of 2008/2009)
2
Identitas Mahasiswa - NAMA : MARCILIA DYAH AYU KUMALA - NIM : 2201404590 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : marcilia_86 pada domain yahoo.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : Prof. Dr. Warsono, M.A - PEMBIMBING 2 : Intan Permata Hapsari, S.Pd., M.Pd. - TGL UJIAN : 2009-08-03
3
Judul TEACHING NARRATIVE WRITING FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH ANIMATED FILM (An Action Research Conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Mlonggo Jepara in the Academic Year of 2008/2009)
4
Abstrak The title of this final project is teaching narrative writing for junior high school students through animated film (an action research conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Mlonggo Jepara in the academic year of 2008/2009). The subject of this study was the eight year of SMP Negeri 1 Mlonggo Jepara. The objectives of the study were to identify the students’ competency in producing a narrative text and to know the improvement of the students’ ability in writing narrative text through animated film as the media. The technique which was used for obtaining the data was an action research. I chose one class consisting of 37 students. In collecting the data, I carried out three activities. In the first activity, I gave a pre- test to measure the students’ ability in writing narrative text. In the second activity, I asked the students to watch a film entitled “Barbie and the Diamond Castle” animated film. By watching that film, I wanted the students to understand clearly the chronological events, so they can create the story during the treatments. In the last activity, I gave a post-test to measure the students’ improvement. The average of the students’ result in the pre-test was 32.97%, in the test it was 52.97%, and in the post-test it was 69.19%. It means that the students’ achievement in writing narrative text was improved because the result of the post- test was better than the passing grade recommended by the Department of Education and Culture, that is 65%. Based on the study, it is found that English animated film seems to be effective for improving the students’ ability in writing narrative. I hope that this technique will be used by other teachers in the class to enable the students to write narrative text effectively.
5
Kata Kunci Teaching narrative writing, media, English animated film.
6
Referensi Aminnudin. 1987. Pengantar Apresiasi Karya Sastra. Bandung: Sinar Baru. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1996. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Baribin, Raminah. 1985. Teori dan Apresiasi Prosa Fiksi. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Brown, Lewis and Hacleroed. 1969. Audio Visual Instruction. New York: Mc. Graw, Hill Book Company. Brown, et al. 1997. Audio Visual Instruction: Technology, Media and Methods. New York: Mc. Graw, Hill Book Company. Curriculum 2004. Standar Kompetensi. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. Tahun 2004. Coulson, J. 1978. The New Oxford Illustrated Dictionary. Tokyo: Topan Printing Company. DEPDIKNAS, 2003. Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Classroom Action Research (CAR). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Elliot, J. 1998. Action Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Finnochiaro, Mary. 1974. English as a Second Language from Theory to Practice. New York: Regent Publishing Company. Gerlach, V. S. and Elly, D. P. 1980. Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. London: Prentice-Hall International. Harris, David. P. 1969. Teaching English as a Second Language. New York: Mc. Graw, Hill Book Company. Heaton, J. B. 1974. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman. Hopkins, 1985. A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. Philadelphia: Open University. Hornby. 1974. Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press. Johnson, D. M. 1987. Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. London: Longman Group. Ltd. Kemp, J. E. 1985. Planning and Producing Audiovisual Materials. New York: Chandler Publishing Company. Kirkpatrick, Betty. 1993. Giant Paperback Dictionary. London: The Bath Press. Lado, Robert. 1964. Writing Measurement. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Inc. Lorimer, Lawrence T. 1991. Grolier Encyclopedia of Knowledge. Volume 7 Danbury, Connecticut: Grolier Inc. Mah, Diane. 1990. Designing an Interactive Videodisc: Applying Theory to Technology: In Bridley (Ed.). The Second Language in Curriculum in Action. Sydney: Macquire University. Mc Quaill: Denni. 1991. Teory Komunikasi Masa: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga. Meyers, Alan. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences Paragraphs and Essays. New York: Education Pearson. Nunan, D. 1995. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ramelan. 1992. Introduction to Linguistic Analysis. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Sadler, R.K. and T.A.S Hayllar. 2000. Text in Action Research 1, an English Workbook. Australia: Macmillan Education Australia PTY, LTD. Summer, Della. 1992. Dictionary of Language and Culture. Harlow: Longman Group U.K. United. Tydiman, Willard. 1984. Teaching the Language Arts. London: Mc Graw- Hill Book Company, Inc. Winter, Richard. 1989. Learning from Experience. London: The Falmer Press. Wragg, E. C. 1994. An Introduction to Classroom Observation. London and New York: Routledge.
7
Terima Kasih http://unnes.ac.id
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.