Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLogan Morrison Modified over 11 years ago
1
UNQUESTIONABLE NEED FOR PEER-REVIEWING 1. Visibility of major papers 2. Improvement of manuscript content 3. Identification of excellence Colloque de lAcadémie des sciences "Évolution des publications scientifiques - Le regard des chercheurs" des 14-15 mai 2007
2
PROBLEMS LINKED TO REVIEWERS 1. Conservatism: fashion versus novelty 2. Priority given to technology 3. Duration of reviewing 4. Conflict of interest with authors
3
PROBLEMS LINKED TO PUBLISHERS 1. Search for scoops 2. Are editors in chief always competent?
4
PROBLEMS LINKED TO AUTHORS 1. Confusion between quality of a manuscript and impact factor of the journal 2. Excessive importance of impact factor for grants and career 3. Risk of transforming scientists into professionals of publication
5
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 1. Change in the editorial policy of major journals 2. Open peer-reviewing 3. Open archives preceding publication
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.