Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Water Quality Investigation James Graham, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Water Quality Investigation James Graham, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."— Presentation transcript:

1 Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Water Quality Investigation James Graham, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

2 Grand Forks Thief River Falls Thief Lake Thief River Watershed = TRW 1,077 sq. mi

3 Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge (USFWS) 26 different impoundments – 26, 321 acres Thief Lake Wildlife Management Area (MN DNR) Thief Lake – 7,100 acres 11 small impoundments on west end of Thief Lake – 210 acres *Moose River Impoundment (North Pool) – 1,250 acres *Moose River Impoundment (South Pool) – 2,250 acres Subtotal = 10,810 Thief River Falls Wildlife Area Office (MN DNR) Eckvoll – 1,750 acres Lost River Pool – 2,300 acres Farmes Pool (state-owned portion) – 245 acres Subtotal = 4,295 Total Wildlife Impoundment Surface Acres in TRW = 41,426 *shared mgmt. w/ Red Lake Watershed District

4 Objective 2.7: Managing Water Impoundments - Manage water impoundments as a complex of basins to provide wetland diversity and improve water quality for maximum benefits to migrating and breeding birds. Management will be within the capabilities of the wetland system as a whole… Agassiz NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan (2005)

5 Present Conditions  Thief River upstream of Agassiz NWR drains ~ 350 mi 2 north and east of the Refuge.  Mud River drains ~ 160 mi 2 east of the Refuge.  Both of the above waterways enter and exit the Refuge in a channelized form.  Primary local land use is agriculture, including row-crop farming and small grains.  Drainage facilitated by more than 1,200 mi of county and judicial ditches in the TRW.  Sedimentation and nutrient loading (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus) are primary water quality concerns in the TRW.

6 Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Water Quality Project Rochelle Nustad, USGS, Grand Forks, ND Data Collection: 2008 - 2010 Results coming. Analysis in progress. Final report – summer(?) 2011

7 Questions to Answer 1.Where is the sediment coming from ? 2.What is the amount and rate of infilling ? 3.Is Agassiz Pool a net source of sediment ? 4. What is the effect of Main Ditch 11 ? Contracted the St. Croix Watershed Research Station (Science Museum of MN) to help answer the above questions. - Drs. Dan Engstrom and Shawn Schottler

8 Sediment Dating & Fingerprinting Radioisotopes: 210 Pb, 137 Cs 137 Cs: Bomb testing product, - Marker for 1963 - Fingerprint of field erosion 210 Pb: Natural, constant “fallout” - Dating tool back 150 years - Fingerprint of field erosion 210 Pb 137 Cs decay

9 Coring Sites Main Ditch 11 Thief River Inlet Agassiz Pool Sediment Cores: An Archive of Erosion History October 2008

10 Ditch 11 Agassiz Pool Things we know from the radioisotopes and composition…. Main portion of pool is accumulating slower than pool-wide average ~ 65% of the sediment is inorganic (was not produced in lake) Agassiz Pool is accumulating sediment Agassiz Pool is a trap of incoming sediment (likely a net producer of organic matter; e.g., algae) Pb inventory can be used to estimate total sediment.

11 Ditch 11 Agassiz Pool Total Sediment Accumulated 1938 – 2008 (Agassiz Pool) Agassiz Pool 23,000 tons/yr 1,600,000 tons >1,040,000 tons from off-Refuge inputs Lake Pepin ~700,000 tons/yr

12 Effect of Main Ditch 11 (within Agassiz Pool) Ditch ~49ft. x 9.5ft. x 19,030ft. Ditch 11 Agassiz Pool Sediment density = 1g/cm 3 - Main Ditch 11 is now essentially full within the Pool Holds 260,000 tons of sediment If spread over entire Pool = 3.2 cm deep

13 Effect of Main Ditch 11 (within Agassiz Pool) Ditch ~49ft. x 9.5ft. x 19,030ft. Ditch 11 Agassiz Pool Sediment density = 1g/cm 3 If spread over entire Pool = 3.2 cm deep 3.2 cm may not seem like a lot, but… - As little as 0.25 cm of sediment can significantly reduce total abundance and species richness of plants that emerge from seed banks. - sediment deposition can enhance the growth of certain plant species (i.e., narrowleaf and hybrid cattail) - Less than 0.5 cm of sediment can render aquatic invertebrate egg banks ineffective.

14 Effect of Main Ditch 11 (within Agassiz Pool) Ditch ~49ft. x 9.5ft. x 19,030ft. Ditch 11 Agassiz Pool Sediment density = 1g/cm 3 3.2 cm may not seem like a lot, but… - As little as 0.25 cm of sediment can significantly reduce total abundance and species richness of plants that emerge from seed banks. - sediment deposition can enhance the growth of certain plant species (i.e., narrowleaf and hybrid cattail) - Less than 0.5 cm of sediment can render aquatic invertebrate egg banks ineffective.

15 Pool elev. = 1140.2’Pool elev. = 1140.5’ 1948: 2006: Non-Uniform Filling Based on 210 Pb Inventory from the cores: - Main Pool is filling 1/3 as fast as whole Pool average - Emergent vegetation is expanding - Sediment infilling - assist vegetation expansion

16 Webster Pool Sediment Loading 1938 - 2008 Ditch 11 If whole basin estimate calculated earlier is correct Lake margins, inlet bays, and shallow areas = ~3000 acres 700,000 tons Main Pool ~7000 acres 660,000 tons Ditch 11 260,000 tons

17

18 2010 Farm Services Agency Photo (exact date unknown)

19 Main Judicial Ditch 11 – looking east across Agassiz Pool  Constructed in 1910 to a mean depth of 9.5 ft., top width of 59 ft. and bottom width of 40 ft.  2010 – nearly completely filled with sediment the entire length of 3.7 mi (within the Pool)

20 - roughly ¼ mi E. of radial gates 7.77’ deep

21 0.59’ deep - roughly ½ mi. E. of radial gates

22 0.13’ deep 2.63 mi E. of radial gates

23 Non-field Erosion Cultivated Field Suspended Sediment Minimal Exposure to Rain Fingerprinting Sediment Sources with 137 Cs (based on studies in Minnesota River Basin) Constant Exposure to Rain 0.38 pCi/g ~0.0 pCi/g Fingerprint Ratio: Field to Non-field

24 Ditch/river input, suspended sample (2009) (avg. of two samples May-June) 0.68 0.47 0.39 0.33 0.52 Agassiz Pool and Incoming River 137 Cs Fingerprint Surface sediment from core 0.35 0.70 0.27 0.46 0.6 0.50 Values = 137 Cs concentration pCi/g Avg (Fingerprint) = 0.47 pCi/g

25 Field Fingerprint ~0.28 - 0.48 pCi/g Agassiz Fingerprint = 0.47 pCi/g Reference fingerprint of Northwestern MN may be different Variable results, difficult to be precise Reminder: >1,040,000 tons of sediment in lake from external sources ~15,000 tons/yr from external sources What do fingerprints tell us about source of sediment? Most importantly Agassiz is shallow and filling with agricultural inputs

26 Summary - Agassiz Pool is filling in - >65% of sediment comes from river/ditch inputs (external) - Ditch 11 is full and holds ~15% of current sediment burden - Margins and inlet areas have “filled” …. rate of infilling in open water areas may now accelerate - Erosion of ag. fields / uplands is dominate sediment source - These processes facilitate expansion of unwanted vegetation (e.g., narrow-leaved cattail)

27 Agassiz Pool Sediment Budget *based on Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT Model) outputs - more coming in than going out - greatest amount of sediment entering from Thief River (versus Mud R.) - estimated that 57% of sediments that enter Agassiz Pool are deposited there. Thief River Watershed Assessment Project - RLWD (a past sediment investigation in the Thief River Watershed estimated ~ 67% of incoming sediment Is deposited)

28


Download ppt "Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Water Quality Investigation James Graham, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google