Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGordon Freeman Modified over 9 years ago
1
What should count as aid? Jonathan Pickering PhD candidate, Centre for Moral, Social and Political Theory Australian National University Jonathan.pickering@anu.edu.au Australasian Aid and Development Workshop Australian National University 13 February 2014
2
Outline 1.Why revisit aid eligibility? 2.The OECD definition and the question of development intention 3.Current exclusions 4.Proposed exclusions 5.Recommendations and conclusion 2
3
1. Why revisit aid eligibility? Changing geography of poverty Broader flows of financing for development Post-2015 goals Policy contention in Australia over refugee costs, climate finance 3
4
2. OECD work on measures of development finance Develop new measure of Total Official Support for Development (TOSD) Investigate whether to revise definition of Official Development Assistance (ODA) 4
5
ODA: the current definition Donors: governments of OECD countries Recipients: on the DAC list of developing countries Concessionality: grants or low-interest loans Development intention: “administered with the promotion of the economic development and welfare of developing countries as its main objective” 5
6
Criteria for a definition of aid Integrity / credibility –Maximise development-oriented funding –Filter out incompatible interests (the “that’s not aid!” test) Adaptiveness –To changing development needs –To understandings of good development practice 6
7
3. Current exclusions: rationales and examples Primary benefit to donor –Counter-terrorism –Carbon offsets Non-developmental benefits to recipient –Military aid –Peacekeeping –Social and cultural programs 7 + risk of adverse impacts
8
4. Proposed exclusions: in-donor costs Reasons for exclusion: –Primary benefit to donor / uncertain benefit to recipient country (scholarships) –Risk of adverse impacts (refugee costs) Reasons for inclusion: –Budgetary effort for donors 8
9
Proposed exclusions: climate finance Reasons for exclusion: –Diversion of funds from existing development priorities –Remedying harm (entitlement not aid) –Global public good Reasons for inclusion: –Adaptation and development closely linked –Safe climate a precondition for development 9
10
Climate finance: the problem of diversion 10 Source: Tomasi (2014).
11
5. Recommendations In-donor costs: cut down on problematic cases Include climate finance but safeguard against diversion through: –Eligibility caps –Innovative financing sources 11
12
DAC scenarios for redefining ODA 12 Concessionality Dev’t intention Current ODA (Net disbursement) $127 bn Source: OECD 2014 (using 2012 ODA data). ‘Focused’ ODA (Budgetary expenditure) $114 bn ‘New’ ODA (Budgetary effort) $129 bn ‘Updated’ ODA (Gross disbursement) $138 bn Narrow Broad
13
Total Official Support for Development Interactions between ODA and total support: a scenario 13 Concessionality Dev’t intention Current ODA Revised ODA Broad Narrow
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.