1. Application of Project Management Methods for Implementation of KhNPP Social Policy Yuliya Taratorkina, Lead Engineer, PR-Department, Khmelnitsky NPP (Ukraine)

2. Deliberative referemdum* Deliberative referemdum* Law about Construction Bill Endorsement Deliberative Referendum Environmental Impact Assessment Feasibility Study *according to the Law of Ukraine «About Decision-Making about Location, Designing, Construction of State Significant Nuclear Installations and Facilities Intended for Radioactive Wastes Treatment» Configuration of KhNPP Control Area 7 districts: Khmelnitky Region: Slavuta, Iziaslav, Bilohiria, Shepetivka Rivne Region: Ostroh, Hoscha, Zdolbuniv

3. Scope Statement: Project of organization and support of deliberative referendum on new power units construction comprise activities, which result in support of Khmelnitsky-3 and Khmelnitsky-4 construction by the majority of population in control area. Project Goal: Ensure positive decision in deliberative referendum on Kh- 3 and Kh-4 construction in control area in the fourth quarter of 2009. Develop and work through mechanisms of organization and support of deliberative referendum on construction of a nuclear facility. Products: Report for KhNPP top management. Model of a project on organization and support of a deliberative referendum on a nuclear facility construction.

4. Project Stakeholders SE NNEGC Energoatom top management SE KhNPP top management Project Manager Project Management Team Energoatom Consultants KhNPP experts Experts (other organizations) Contractors Khmelnitsky Regional State Administration Rivne Regional State Administration

5. Communication audit Direction of articles Subject pattern

6. Target Group Analysis Target group: –residents of control area districts, adults, citizens, entitled to vote. Results of public opinion poll: –40,8% support construction; –26,7% consider construction unnecessary; –32,5% are uncertain. Reasons of Kh-3/Kh-4 construction denial: –negative influence on environment; –negative influence on health; –lack of necessity in construction; –life danger (9.5% - ‘post-chernobyl syndome’).

7. Project Strategy Scope: Project documentation should be developed in 2 nd quarter. All preparatory activities should be fulfilled before public consultations in 3 rd quarter; Public hearings and deliberative referendum should be held; report and model of the project should be prepared in 4 th quarter. 4 aspects: –Scope; –Quality; –Resources; –Time.

8. Work Breakdown Structure

9. Organizational Breakdown Structure

10. Project Schedule Project’s life – 187 work days.

11. Conclusion PM methods provides the following: –Results are predictable; –Activities are controllable; –Team is efficient; –Experience is accumulated. Traditional approach leads to: –Weak relations between departments; –Slow communication; –Attention to specialization.