Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 2011 Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 2011 Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 2011 Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin Bennett, Joan O’Brien, Lila Wondercheck, Ciera Afrank, Kendra Nelson, Liz Backhaus, Darienne Pokorny, Jason Kaufman, Demi Edgell, Jacob Haase, John O’Brien, Brock Donelson, Billy O’Brien, Megan Nelson, Brooke Pieke, Alex Wiese

2 2 (with Township-Range Labels) Shell Creek and Loseke-Taylor Creek Watersheds Lower Platte North Natural Resources District 6 South Branch North Branch

3 3 6 Above Newman Grove Below Newman Grove

4 4 6 Below Lindsay West Platte Center

5 5 W.Q.I. The Water Quality Index was developed by the National Sanitation Foundation as a standard system to compare different bodies of water. To determine the WQI, a series of nine tests were performed. These tests were: dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, pH, Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), temperature, total phosphate, nitrates, turbidity, and total solids. We also did a water discharge test which we use to measure the flow of the creek in cubic feet per second.

6 6 After the tests are completed, the WQI for each section of the creek can be computed. To formulate the WQI, we first computed Q- values. We multiply this number by a weighting factor, which provides a measure of the relative importance of each test to overall water quality. The water quality index ranges from zero to 100. - 0 - 25 is very bad - 25 - 50 is bad - 50 - 70 is medium - 70 - 90 is good - 90 - 100 is excellent The bio-indicator tests are not part of the W.Q.I., but do give us a water quality rating.

7 7 Sample W.Q.I. Curve Chart

8 8 Sample W.Q.I. Form Overall Water Quality Index ___

9 9

10 10

11 11 The higher the change, the worse the water quality.

12 12 The higher the concentration, the worse the water quality.

13 13 Fecal Coliform

14 14

15 15

16 16 *Flow was not measured for May Sites 3,4,5,6

17 17

18 18

19 19 The higher the change, the worse the water quality.

20 20

21 21

22 22

23 23 Medium Bad Good

24 24 Good Bad Medium

25 25

26 26

27 27 *2006 Fecal Coliform Average 8,058 col/100 mL

28 Chemical Test Conclusions Upstream sites have a decreasing WQI, while lower stream sites have an increasing WQI. Flow and Nitrate are continuing to follow each other. May phosphate levels are high. Nitrates over all are stabilizing. 28

29 29 Macro Invertebrates TolerantSomewhat SensitiveSensitive

30 30 Beaver-Shell Creek Comparison 2011

31 31 Beaver-Shell Creek Comparison 2011

32 32 Beaver-Shell Creek WQI Comparison Good Medium Bad

33 33 2010 Flood Study

34 34 DateSitepH Temp. Chan. Total Solids mg/L Fecal Coliform Flow CFS Turbidity JTU's Dissolved Oxygen % Saturation Dissolved Oxygen ppm 5 day BODNitratesPhosphates WQI numberWQI Rating 6/22 Site 180.24107505.4171.7736%3.8040.921.4444.71Bad Site 27.5139028002.93399.0212%0.209.680.235.05Bad Site 37.30.26703508.96379.210%1012.50.1952.53Medium Site 47.91.167075028.4441018%1.70.74.621.2348.94Bad Site 67.90160020043.8940614%0.102.832.848.97Bad Site 57.80.3166040081.2107611%1.402.821.5651.03Medium 6/23 Site 18.10.15405505.7866.764%6.7026.220.8463.11Medium Site 27.71.95905502.34114.247%4.5010.560.6957.66Medium Site 37.8-0.273030017.3139.8148%4.6032.650.5656.66Medium Site 47.80.363040011.1617765%6.20.711.66156.3Medium Site 67.7260030030.4224553%5.209.61.2753.9Medium Site 57.80.2670800101.8935862%6.2011.041.1954.31Medium

35 35 DateSitepH Temp. Chang. Total Solids mg/L Fecal Coliform Flow CFS Turbidity JTU's Dissolved Oxygen % Saturation Dissolved Oxygen ppm 5 Day BODNitratesPhosphates WQI numberWQI Rating 7/20 Site 17.91.5620501.9789.550%4.30.738.020.8153.86Medium Site 27.82.165002.3286.439%3.3033.790.6560.87Medium Site 38.205801506.8952.1755%4.60.329.040.7654.77Medium Site 47.70.266010016.09976750%4.10.121.470.8759.07Medium Site 68.30.264020050.416163%5.42.822.7041.0952.37Medium Site 580.340015011.2835263%5.4320.51.1254.21Medium 7/21 Site 17.9N/A430400N/A70.9123%3.50.726.5761.1942.87Bad Site 27.9N/A44050N/A120.0916%2.5012.320.5546.93Bad Site 37.9N/A54050N/A217.2714%2.30.312.0120.4747.16Bad Site 47.6N/A2510400N/A235.40%0002.2542.64Bad Site 68.2N/A1320200N/A760.840%035.022.2541.03Bad Site 57.5N/A4170150N/A271.560%02.813.160.9638.38Bad

36 36 Student Scientists in Action


Download ppt "1 2011 Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google