Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1.

Published byJack Ryan Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1 (2012) 357.1 (2013)

2 2 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 by Subgroup 2013 MAP 2013 Status: Approaching Number of Reportable Students in Each Sub-Group State Overall = 532,005 District Overall = 10,632 Building Overall = 184 Black (not-Hispanic) = 125 White (not-Hispanic) = 51 Free & Reduced Lunch = 102 Individualized Education Program = 24 Limited English Proficiency = 9 388.2 – White (not Hispanic) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 360.7 – State Overall Total 262.5 – Individualized Education Program 342.2 – Free & Reduced Lunch 344.8 – Black (not Hispanic) 300.0 – Limited English Proficiency 339.3 – District Overall Total 357.1 – Building Overall Total

3 3 Cold Water Elementary Mathematics Standard 1 2013 Status: On Track 345.9 (2012) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 335.2 (2011) 369.6 (2013) 323.5 (2010)

4 4 Cold Water Elementary Mathematics Standard 1 by Subgroup 2013 MAP 2013 Status: On Track Number of Reportable Students in Each Sub-Group State Overall = 512,624 District Overall = 11,679 Building Overall = 184 Black (not-Hispanic) = 125 White (not-Hispanic) = 51 Free & Reduced Lunch = 102 Individualized Education Program = 24 Limited English Proficiency = 9 MAP Performance Index Status Targets 403.9 – White (not Hispanic) 351.9 – State Overall Total 318.3 – District Overall Total 279.2 – Individualized Education Program 356.9 – Free & Reduced Lunch 355.2 – Black (not Hispanic) 377.8 – Limited English Proficiency 369.6 – Building Overall Total

5 5 328.8 (2012) 320.3 (2010) Cold Water Elementary Science Standard 1 2013 Status: 2020 Target 344.6 (2011) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 375.4 (2013)

6 6 Cold Water Elementary Science Standard 1 by Subgroup 2013 MAP 2013 Status: 2020 Target Number of Reportable Students in Each Sub-Group State Overall = 200,084 District Overall = 3,771 Building Overall = 65 Black (not-Hispanic) = 40 White (not-Hispanic) = 20 Free & Reduced Lunch = 35 Individualized Education Program = 11 Limited English Proficiency = 4 445.0 – White (not Hispanic) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 360.4 – State Overall Total 351.4 – Free & Reduced Lunch 340.0 – Black (not Hispanic) 300.0 – Individualized Education Program 350.0 – Limited English Proficiency 375.4 – Building Overall Total 335.5 – District Overall Total

Download ppt "1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1."

Similar presentations

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card 2008-9 Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)

Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)
FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.

FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.

Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.

2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.

Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.

WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.

November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
9/6/2015 Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond.

9/6/2015 Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”

OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.

HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google