Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLenard Lane Modified over 9 years ago
1
Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi
2
Agenda TransAct Usage Data & Renewal Title III Consortium Model Title III Program Checklist
4
TransACT Background Parent Notification of ESEA Title I, Section 1118(f) and Title III, Part C, Section 3302 2010 WVDE Subscription - TransACT GenEd Parent Notifications - TransACT NCLB Parent Notifications - TransACT State Masters Special Programs Legally Reviewed
14
Audience Participation How are you currently using TransACT to support the work of Federal Programs? How might your county utilize TransAct in the future? What might be some effective ways to increase statewide usage?
15
Consortia SEC. 3114. Within-State Allocation (b) LIMITATION. – A State educational agency shall not award a subgrant from an allocation made under subsection (a) if the amount of such subgrant would be less than $10,000.
16
Consortia – Current Structure The current consortia model utilizes a RESA approach to allocating subgrants. Essentially the RESA is a fiscal agency to transfer funds to LEA’s. – No accountability is established at the RESA level for monitoring or strategic planning. The alignment of LEA’s in the current consortia model does not correspond directly with the established WV geographical grouping of district in RESA’s. – Currently RESA 4 and RESA 6 are functioning as a fiscal agency
17
Consortia Model Virginia – http://www.doe.virginia.gov/federal_pr ograms/esea/applications/title3/title3_ part-a_consortium_agreemt.xls http://www.doe.virginia.gov/federal_pr ograms/esea/applications/title3/title3_ part-a_consortium_agreemt.xls California – http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/lepcon sortia.asp http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/lepcon sortia.asp
18
Boone 4 $ 305.00 $ 1,220.004 Braxton 0 $ 305.00 $ -4 Fayette 6 $ 305.00 $ 1,830.004 Greenbrier 32 $ 305.00 $ 9,760.004 Lincoln 2 $ 305.00 $ 610.004 Logan 6 $ 305.00 $ 1,830.004 Mason 12 $ 305.00 $ 3,660.004 Mercer 17 $ 305.00 $ 5,185.004 Mingo 2 $ 305.00 $ 610.004 Nicholas 7 $ 305.00 $ 2,135.004 Pocahontas 0 $ 305.00 $ -4 Wayne 24 $ 305.00 $ 7,320.004 Webster 1 $ 305.00 4 Wyoming 1 $ 305.00 4
19
Proposal for Restructure Subgrant allocation is allotted to a regional educational center that services multiple LEA’s (RESA). – Fiscal agent for the grant and issues subgrants to the individual LEA’s that do not meet the $10,000 minimum. – RESA retains a portion of federal allocation from each LEA Meaningful professional development Additional technical assistance
20
Audience Participation What do you see as the positives of the restructured model? What challenges might exist? What suggestions do you have regarding the proposal?
21
Risk Factor Technical Assistance Tool Self-monitoring Other States – Illinois – Oregon – North Carolina
22
Risk Factor Sheet County Does your county hire (contract) ESL certified teacher for your ESL students? Does your county send any teachers to ESL MU Cohort? Did you submit Monitoring Response by due date? Barbour Berkeley Boone Braxton Brooke
23
Audience Participation What do you see as the benefit of this self-assessment checklist and how might it be used? What challenges might this document create? What additional questions or factors should be considered or addressed in this document or the process?
24
Any Questions? Robert Crawford rcrawford@access.k12.wv.us Mami Itamochi mitamochi@access.k12.wv.us Phone 304-558-0200
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.