1. Fundamentals of Organization Structure
Chapter Three
Fundamentals of
Organization Structure

2. Three key components in the definition of Organization Structure
Organization structure designates formal reporting relationships, including the number of levels in the hierarchy and the span of control of managers and supervisors.
Organization structure identifies the grouping together of individuals into departments and of departments into the total organization.
Organization structure includes the design of systems to ensure effective communication, coordination, and integration of effort across departments.

3. A Sample Organization Chart

4. The Relationship of Organization Design to Efficiency vs
The Relationship of Organization Design to Efficiency vs. Learning Outcomes
Horizontal Organization
Designed for Learning
Horizontal structure is dominant
Shared tasks, empowerment
Relaxed hierarchy, few rules
Horizontal, face-to-face communication
Many teams and task forces
Decentralized decision making
ex. Dow Chem. , P & G
Dominant
Structural
Approach
Vertical structure is dominant
Specialized tasks
Strict hierarchy, many rules
Vertical communication and reporting systems
Few teams, task forces or integrators
Centralized decision making
Vertical Organization
Designed for Efficiency

5. Vertical Information Linkages
Vertical linkages are used to coordinate activities between the top and bottom of an organization and are designed primarily for control of the organization.
Structural devices to achieve vertical linkage:
-- Hierarchical Referral
-- Rules and Plans
-- Vertical Information Systems

6. Ladder of Mechanisms for Horizontal Linkage and Coordination
H IGH
Teams
Full-time Integrators
Task Forces
Coordination Required
Amount of Horizontal
Direct Contact
LOW
Information Systems
LOW
HIGH
Cost of Coordination in
Time and Human Resources

7. Project Manager Location in the Structure
President
Finance
Department
Financial
Accountant
Budget
Analyst
Management
Engineering
Product
Designer
Draftsperson
Electrical
Marketing
Market
Researcher
Advertising
Specialist
Planner
Purchasing
Buyer
Project Manager
New
Product B
Product A
Product C

8. Teams Used for Horizontal Coordination at Wizard Software Company
President
Marketing Vice Pres.
Programming Vice Pres
Research Vice Pres
Videogames Basic Research
Supervisor
Videogames
Sales Manager
Videogames
Chief Engineer
Videogames Product Team
Applications and Testing
Supervisor
Memory Products
Sales Manager
Memory Products
Chief Programmer
Memory Products
Research Supervisor
Memory Products Team
Memory Products
International Manager
Customer Service
Manager
Procurement
Supervisor
Advertising Manager

9. Organization Design Alternatives
Required Work Activities
Reporting Relationships
Departmental Groupings

10. Organization Design Alternatives
Required Work Activities
--Departments are created to perform tasks considered strategically important to the company. e.g. Dept. of HR
--As organizations grow larger and more complex, more and more functions need to be performed.
--Organizations typically define new departments or divisions as a way to accomplish tasks deemed valuable by the organization.
--Today, many companies are finding it important to establish departments. such as IT or e-business to take advantage of new technology and new business opportunities.

11. Organization Design Alternatives
Reporting Relationships
--Reporting relationships, often called the chain of command, are represented by vertical lines on an organization chart.
--The definition of departments and the drawing of reporting relationships defines how employees are to be grouped into departments.

12. Organization Design Alternatives
Departmental Grouping Options
--Options for department grouping, including functional grouping, divisional grouping, multifocused grouping (Matrix or Hybrid), horizontal grouping, and modular grouping. (Fig. 3.6)
--Departmental grouping affects employees because they share a common supervisor and common resources, are jointly responsible for performance, and tend to identify and collaborate with one another.

13. Structural Design Options for Grouping Employees into Departments
Functional
Grouping
CEO
Engineering
Marketing
Manufacturing
Divisional
Grouping
Source: Adapted from David Nadler and Michael Tushman,
Strategic Organization Design (Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1988), 68.

14. Strengths and Weaknesses of Functional Organization Structure
Allows economies of scale within functional departments
Enables in-depth knowledge and skill development
Enables organization to accomplish functional goals
Is best with only one or a few products
WEAKNESSES:
Slow response time to environmental changes
May cause decisions to pile on top, hierarchy overload
Leads to poor horizontal coordination among departments
Results in less innovation
Involves restricted view of organizational goals
Source: Adapted from Robert Duncan, “What Is the Right
Organization Structure? Decision Tree Analysis Provides the Answer,”
Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1979): 429.

15. Strengths and Weaknesses of Divisional Organization Structure
Suited to fast change in unstable environment
Leads to client satisfaction because product responsibility and contact points are clear
Involves high coordination across functions
Allows units to adapt to differences in products, regions, clients
Best in large organizations with several products
Decentralizes decision-making
WEAKNESSES:
Eliminates economies of scale in functional departments
Leads to poor coordination across product lines
Eliminates in-depth competence and technical specialization
Makes integration and standardization across product lines difficult
Source: Adapted from Robert Duncan, “What Is the
Right Organization Structure? Decision Tree Analysis
Provides the Answer,” Organizational Dynamics
(Winter 1979): 431.

16. Reorganization from Functional Structure to Divisional Structure at Info-Tech
R&D
Manufacturing
Accounting
Marketing
Info-Tech
President
Divisional
Structure

17. Structural Design Options for Grouping Employees (Continued)
Multifocused
Grouping
CEO
Manufacturing
Marketing
Product
Division 2
Division 1
Source: Adapted from David Nadler and Michael
Tushman, Strategic Organization Design (Glenview, Ill.:
Scott Foresman, 1988), 68.

18. Structural Design Options for Grouping Employees (Continued)
Horizontal
Grouping
CEO
Human Resources
Finance
Core
Process 1
Core
Process 2
Source: Adapted from David Nadler and Michael Tushman,
Strategic Organization Design (Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman,
1988), 68.

19. Geographical Structure for Apple Computer
CEO
Steve Jobs
Apple
Europe
Pacific
France
Products
Asia
Japan
Australia
Americas
Canada
Latin
America/
Caribbean
Sales
Service and
Marketing
to Regions
Source:

20. Dual-Authority Structure in a Matrix Organization
President
Director
Design
Mfg
Marketing
Procure-
ment
of Product
Vice
President
Vice
President
Vice
President
Controller
Operations
Manager
Product
Manager A
Product
Manager B
Product
Manager C
Product
Manager D

21. Strengths and Weaknesses of Matrix Organization Structure
Achieves coordination necessary to meet dual demands from customers
Flexible sharing of human resources across products
Suited to complex decisions and frequent changes in unstable environment
Provides opportunity for both functional and product skill development
Best in medium-sized organizations with multiple products
WEAKNESSES:
Causes participants to experience dual authority, which can be frustrating and confusing
Means participants need good interpersonal skills and extensive training
Is time consuming; involves frequent meetings and conflict resolution sessions
Will not work unless participants understand it and adopt collegial rather than vertical-type relationships
Requires great effort to maintain power balance
Source: Adapted from Robert Duncan, “What Is the Right
Organization Structure? Decision Tree Analysis Provides the
Answer,”Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1979): 429.

22. Matrix Structure for Worldwide Steel Company
President
Industrial
Relations
Vice
Mfg.
Services
Finance
Marketing
Metallurgy
Field Sales
Open Die
Business Mgr.
Ring Products
Wheels & Axles
Steelmaking
Vertical Functions
Horizontal Product Lines

23. A Horizontal Structure
Team 3 2 1
Top
Management
Customer
Process
Owner
Testing
Product
Planning
Research
Market
Analysis
New Product Development Process
Distrib.
Material
Flow
Purchasing
Procurement and Logistics Process
Sources: Based on Frank Ostroff,
The Horizontal Organization, (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1999); John A. Byrne,
“The Horizontal Corporation,” Business Week,
December 20, 1993, 76-81; and Thomas A. Stewart,
“The Search for the Organization of Tomorrow,”
Fortune, May 19, 1992,

24. Strengths and Weaknesses of Horizontal Structure
Flexibility and rapid response to changes in customer needs
Directs the attention of everyone toward the production and delivery of value to the customer
Each employee has a broader view of organizational goals
Promotes a focus on teamwork and collaboration—common commitment to meeting objectives
Improves quality of life for employees by offering them the opportunity to share responsibility, make decisions, and be accountable for outcomes
WEAKNESSES:
Determining core processes to organize around is difficult and time-consuming
Requires changes in culture, job design, management philosophy, and information and reward systems
Traditional managers may balk when they have to give up power and authority
Requires significant training of employees to work effectively in a horizontal team environment
Can limit in-depth skill development
Sources: Based on Frank Ostroff, The Horizontal Organization: What the
Organization of the Future Looks Like and How It Delivers Value to
Customers, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999);
and Richard L. Daft, Organization Theory and Design, 6th ed.,
(Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing, 1998) 253.

25. Hybrid Structure Part 1. Sun Petrochemical Products
President
Functional
Structure
Chief
Counsel
Human
Resources
Director
Technology
Vice
President
Financial
Services
Vice Pres.
Product
Structure
Fuels
Vice
President
Lubricants
Vice
President
Chemicals
Vice
President
Sources: Based on Linda S. Ackerman, “Transition Management:
An In-Depth Look at Managing Complex Change,”
Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1982): ;
and Frank Ostroff, The Horizontal Organization,
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), Fig. 2.1, 34.

26. Hybrid Structure Part 2. Ford Customer Service Division
Vice President and
General Manager
Functional
Structure
Finance
Strategy and
Communication
Human
Resources
Director and
Process Owner
Teams
Teams
Parts Supply / Logistics Group
Director and
Process Owner
Horizontal Structure
Teams
Teams
Vehicle Service Group
Director and
Process Owner
Teams
Technical Support Group
Sources: Based on Linda S. Ackerman, “Transition Management:
An In-Depth Look at Managing Complex Change,” Organizational Dynamics
(Summer 1982): ; and Frank Ostroff, The Horizontal Organization,
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), Fig. 2.1, 34.

27. Organization Contextual Variables that Influence Structure
(learning vs.
efficiency)
Environment
Chapters 4, 6
Culture
Chapter 10
Size
Chapter 9
Strategy,
Goals
Chapter 2
Technology
Chapters 7,8
Sources: Adapted from Jay R. Galbraith,
Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations, 2nd ed.
(Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1994), Ch.1;
Jay R. Galbraith, Organization Design (Reading, Mass.:
Addison-Wesley, 1977), Ch. 1.

28. The Relationship of Structure to Organization’s Need for Efficiency vs
The Relationship of Structure to Organization’s Need for Efficiency vs. Learning
Matrix
Structure
Horizontal
Structure
Functional
Structure
Functional with
cross-functional
teams, integrators
Divisional
Structure
Modular Structure
Horizontal:
Coordination
Learning
Innovation
Flexibility
Dominant
Structural
Approach
Vertical:
Control
Efficiency
Stability
Reliability

29. Symptoms of Structural Deficiency
Decision making is delayed or lacking in quality
The organization does not respond innovatively to a changing environment
Too much conflict is evident