Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarnaby Haynes Modified over 9 years ago
1
Introduction to Machine Learning BMI/IBGP 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics The Ohio State University
2
Machine Learning Statistical learning Artificial intelligence Pattern recognition Data mining
3
Machine Learning Supervised Unsupervised Semi-supervised Regression
4
Clustering and Classification Preprocessing Distance measures Popular algorithms (not necessarily the best ones) More sophisticated ones Evaluation Data mining
5
- Clustering or classification? - Is training data available? - What domain specific knowledge can be applied? - What preprocessing of data is needed? - Log / data scale and numerical stability - Filtering / denoising - Nonlinear kernel - Feature selection (do I need to use all the data?) - Is the dimensionality of the data too high?
6
-Accuracy vs. generality -Overfitting -Model selection Model complexity Prediction error Training sample Testing sample (reproduced from Hastie et.al.)
7
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? - Feature selection – genes, transformations of expression levels. - Genes discovered in the class comparison (t-test). Risk: missing genes. - Iterative approach : select genes under different p- value cutoff, then select the one with good performance using cross-validation. - Principal components (pro and con). - Discriminant analysis (e.g., LDA).
8
- Dimensionality Reduction - Principal component analysis (PCA) - Singular value decomposition (SVD) - Karhunen-Loeve transform (KLT) Basis for P SVD
9
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) - Other things to consider - Numerical balance/data normalization - Noisy direction - Continuous vs. discrete data - Principal components are orthogonal to each other, however, biological data are not - Principal components are linear combinations of original data - Prior knowledge is important - PCA is not clustering!
10
Visualization of Microarray Data Multidimensional scaling (MDS) High-dimensional coordinates unknown Distances between the points are known The distance may not be Euclidean, but the embedding maintains the distance in a Euclidean space Try different dimensions (from one to ???) At each dimension, perform optimal embedding to minimize embedding error Plot embedding error (residue) vs. dimension Pick the knee point
11
Visualization of Microarray Data Multidimensional scaling (MDS)
12
Distance Measure (Metric?) -What do you mean by “similar”? -Euclidean -Uncentered correlation -Pearson correlation
13
Distance Metric -Euclidean 102123_atLip11596.0002040.9001277.0004090.5001357.6001039.2001387.300 3189.0001321.3002164.400868.600185.300266.4002527.800 160552_atAp1s14144.4003986.9003083.1006105.9003245.8004468.4007295.000 5410.9003162.1004100.9004603.2006066.2005505.8005702.700 d E (Lip1, Ap1s1) = 12883
14
Distance Metric -Pearson Correlation 102123_atLip11596.0002040.9001277.0004090.5001357.6001039.2001387.300 3189.0001321.3002164.400868.600185.300266.4002527.800 160552_atAp1s14144.4003986.9003083.1006105.9003245.8004468.4007295.000 5410.9003162.1004100.9004603.2006066.2005505.8005702.700 d P (Lip1, Ap1s1) = 0.904
15
Distance Metric -Pearson Correlation r = 1r = -1 Ranges from 1 to -1.
16
Distance Metric -Uncentered Correlation 102123_atLip11596.0002040.9001277.0004090.5001357.6001039.2001387.300 3189.0001321.3002164.400868.600185.300266.4002527.800 160552_atAp1s14144.4003986.9003083.1006105.9003245.8004468.4007295.000 5410.9003162.1004100.9004603.2006066.2005505.8005702.700 d u (Lip1, Ap1s1) = 0.835 About 33.4 o
17
Distance Metric -Difference between Pearson correlation and uncentered correlation 102123_atLip11596.0002040.9001277.0004090.5001357.6001039.2001387.300 3189.0001321.3002164.400868.600185.300266.4002527.800 160552_atAp1s14144.4003986.9003083.1006105.9003245.8004468.4007295.000 5410.9003162.1004100.9004603.2006066.2005505.8005702.700 Pearson correlation Baseline expression possible Uncentered correlation All are considered signals
18
Distance Metric -Difference between Euclidean and correlation
19
Distance Metric -PCC means similarity, how can we transform it to distance? -1-PCC -Negative correlation may also mean “close” in signal pathway (1-|PCC|, 1-PCC^2)
20
Supervised Learning Perceptron – neural networks
21
Supervised Learning Perceptron – neural networks
22
-Supervised Learning -Support vector machines (SVM) and Kernels -Only (binary) classifier, no data model
23
-Supervised Learning - Naïve Bayesian classifier -Bayes rule -Maximum a posterior (MAP) Prior prob. Conditional prob.
24
- Dimensionality reduction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA) B. 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0............. A w. (From S. Wu’s website)
25
Linear Discriminant Analysis B. 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0............. A w. (From S. Wu’s website)
26
-Supervised Learning - Support vector machines (SVM) and Kernels -Kernel – nonlinear mapping
27
How do we use microarray? Profiling Clustering Cluster to detect patient subgroups Cluster to detect gene clusters and regulatory networks
29
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? - Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering
30
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? -Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering Single linkage: The linking distance is the minimum distance between two clusters.
31
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? -Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering Complete linkage: The linking distance is the maximum distance between two clusters.
32
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? -Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering Average linkage/UPGMA: The linking distance is the average of all pair-wise distances between members of the two clusters. Since all genes and samples carry equal weight, the linkage is an Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Means (UPGMA).
33
How do we process microarray data (clustering)? -Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering Single linkage – Prone to chaining and sensitive to noise Complete linkage – Tends to produce compact clusters Average linkage – Sensitive to distance metric
34
-Unsupervised Learning – Hierarchical Clustering
35
Dendrograms Distance – the height each horizontal line represents the distance between the two groups it merges. Order – Opensource R uses the convention that the tighter clusters are on the left. Others proposed to use expression values, loci on chromosomes, and other ranking criteria.
36
-Unsupervised Learning - K-means -Vector quantization -K-D trees -Need to try different K, sensitive to initialization
37
-Unsupervised Learning - K-means [cidx, ctrs] = kmeans(yeastvalueshighexp, 4, 'dist', 'corr', 'rep',20); K Metric
38
-Unsupervised Learning - K-means -Number of class K needs to be specified -Does not always converge -Sensitive to initialization
39
-Unsupervised Learning - K-means
40
-Unsupervised Learning -Self-organized maps (SOM) -Neural network based method -Originally used as a visualization method for visualize (embedding) high-dimensional data -Also related vector quantization -The idea is to map close data points to the same discrete level
41
-Issues -Lack of consistency or representative features (5.3 TP53 + 0.8 PTEN doesn’t make sense) -Data structure is missing -Not robust to outliers and noise D’Haeseleer 2005 Nat. Biotechnol 23(12):1499-501
42
-Model-based clustering methods (Han) http://www.cs.umd.edu/~bhhan/research2.html Pan et al. Genome Biology 2002 3:research0009.1 doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-2-research0009
43
-Structure-based clustering methods
44
– Data Mining is searching for knowledge in data –Knowledge mining from databases –Knowledge extraction –Data/pattern analysis –Data dredging –Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD)
45
−The process of discovery Interactive + Iterative Scalable approaches
46
Popular Data Mining Techniques – Clustering: Most dominant technique in use for gene expression analysis in particular and bioinformatics in general. –Partition data into groups of similarity – Classification: –Supervised version of clustering technique to model class membership can subsequently classify unseen data. – Frequent Pattern Analysis – A method for identifying frequently re-curring patterns (structural and transactional). – Temporal/Sequence Analysis –Model temporal data wavelets, FFT etc. – Statistical Methods –Regression, Discriminant analysis
47
Summary −A good clustering method will produce high quality clusters with −high intra-class similarity −low inter-class similarity −The quality of a clustering result depends on both the similarity measure used by the method and its implementation. −Other metrics include: density, information entropy, statistical variance, radius/diameter −The quality of a clustering method is also measured by its ability to discover some or all of the hidden patterns.
48
Recommended Literature 1. Bioinformatics – The Machine Learning Approach by P. Baldi & S. Brunak, 2 nd edition, The MIT Press, 2001 2. Data Mining – Concepts and Techniques by J. Han & M. Kamber, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001 3. Pattern Classification by R. Duda, P. Hart and D. Stork, 2 nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2001 4. The Elements of Statistical Learning by T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, Springer-Verlag, 2001
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.