Download presentation
1
Hotel Industry Research – an STR Perspective
The SHARE Center Supporting Hotel-related Academic Research and Education
2
Table of Contents Brief intro to STR How do we work with others?
SHARE Center, Products and Services What data does STR track? How do we look at hotel data? Types, metrics, and perspectives How do we work with others? Past research, future possibilities
3
Who is Smith Travel Research?
The recognized leader in hotel benchmarking STR samples (obtains performance data from) over 70% of total U.S. room supply (99% of chain hotels and most significant independent hotels) and nearly 50% of total global (non-US) room supply STR provides monthly, weekly, and daily STAR reports to over 42,000 hotels Impartial, timely, confidential, and accurate
4
Who does STR serve? Hotel Companies and Hotels (most GM’s bonuses)
Convention & Visitor Bureaus, Tourism and travel organizations, Hotel associations (endorsed by AHLA) Developers, Consultants, Appraisers (most bank loans) Wall Street/Accounting firms, Financial institutions Media (Wall St Journal, USA Today, …) National & international hotel conferences (keynotes) Hotel vendors (HBO, Sealy, Starbucks, …) Educators Government (GSA, FEMA, BLS, DOE/HS, NPS, Commerce, …) Main customers are hotel companies, enabling us to serve many third parties including universities
5
A Little History of STR 1985 – founded, started collecting hotel attribute info 1987 – started collecting monthly sales data 1992 – started collecting data outside US, NA then WW 1999 – started collecting daily data 2008 – launched STR Global (offices in London, Singapore, Tokyo, Beijing, Dubai, Australia, Italy, Brazil, …) 2008 – launched Hotel News Now (offices in Cleveland) 2009 – RRC and STR Analytics (offices in Boulder) 2009 – launched Hotel Data Conference 2011 – launched the SHARE Center
6
The SHARE Center The Mission: A Global Partnership:
Provide thorough and timely data for academic research Provide comprehensive and relevant training materials for the classroom A Global Partnership: STR, ICHRIE, and others (AHLEI, industry) Launched in 2011, over 80 schools now involved around the world
7
Resources from the SHARE Center
Ability to order ad-hoc reports: Trends, HOST (P&L), Pipeline, Census data, Forecasts, others Ability to generate Destination reports Training programs, Train the Trainer sessions Comprehensive set of sample reports Publications, access to articles and presentations STR Census database, hotel company database Help with research, hotel industry reference info Campus visits, webinars, updates, forums Student certification in Hotel Industry Analytics
8
Free electronic news service. Click “Join” and you’ll get an every morning with headlines. Click to read Focus on data/performance, latest issues, conferences; global topics User-friendly search cap- ability, 3 years of past articles Great for current events, staying connected to Industry
9
What data does STR track?
Hotel census data – attribute information Name, address, phone, number of rooms Geographic & non-geographic categorization, lat/longs Amenities, physical info, affiliations, & history (changes) US & WW hotels Pipeline data Hotels under construction Projects in planning stage Rooms sales data – performance information Rooms available, rooms sold, & room revenue Monthly & daily
10
Other types of data: Segmented sales data Additional Revenue data
Group, Transient, & Contract Rooms sold & Room revenue Additional Revenue data Food & Beverage Revenue Other Revenue Total Revenue Profit & Loss data - HOST=Hotel Operating STatistics Multiple revenue & expense accounts Also payroll, fees, taxes, profit Collected annually Channel data – rooms & revenue by booking source
11
Data Participation & History
Type of Data US WW (non-US) # Hotels Back Data Census/Attribute 52K 1985* 95K 1992* STAR - monthly 29K 1987 13K varies STAR - daily 28.5K 1998 2000 Group/Transient 4K** 2002 1K 2007+ Additional Revenue 3K HOST (annual P&L) 6K 1991 2K 1997 Pipeline 4K*** 2008 * Started tracking data/changes in this year, hotels open back to 1750, ** 95% of Luxury and Upper Upscale hotels, *** # of current projects
12
Overview of Products and Services
Contract Reports: Hotels: STAR Property Report Hotel Companies: Corporate Reports & Data CVBs/Tourism Orgs: Destination Reports Ad-hoc Reports Publications Industry presentations Additional Services
13
STAR Property Reports ed to hotel on monthly, weekly, and daily basis Compare subject hotel to comp set(s) and industry segments Displays performance metrics for different time periods New: Spa STAR, Casino STAR
14
Monthly STAR Report - Competitive Set Tab
15
Weekly STAR Report - Perspective Pages
16
Bandwidth Analysis Report
17
Corporate Reports & Data Files
Various reports and raw data files for corporate and regional staff Used by headquarters of hotel companies, correlate with internal data Lots of different types of data, comparison options, methodologies
18
Destination Reports Monthly and weekly reports generated for nearly 600 CVBs, DMOs, and Local Tourism Organizations Variety of templates/ pages and different industry segments or user-defined groups Provide additional help for for CVBs
19
Ad-Hoc Reports Trends Pipeline
Select industry segment or user-defined set of hotels Displays monthly data for 5, 10, or 20 years, also daily, group/transient, running 12 Pipeline Display hotels under con- struction, projects in planning, existing hotels, and conversion activity
20
Ad-Hoc Reports HOST Reports Census Database
Select industry segment or user-defined set of hotels Displays revenue and expense detail, including profitability Census Database Nearly 100 fields of hotel information, attributes, affiliations, history, …
21
Publications US Hotel Reviews Forecasts Monthly & Weekly
Provide overview of industry performance (US, Scales, Locations, Regions, Top 25 Markets) Forecasts Project future performance Available for 25 US and 44 WW markets
22
WW Publications Global Hotel Reviews WW Country Reports
Versions for Americas, Europe, Asia/Pacific, and Mideast/Africa Overview of industry performance WW Country Reports Available for 13 countries and country groups including Canada, UK, Germany, China, India, … Detailed performance within a country
23
Occupancy back to 2008 level, ADR ½ way, RevPAR ⅔ way
Industry Presentations Total US - Key Performance Indicators Annual 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 Occupancy back to 2008 level, ADR ½ way, RevPAR ⅔ way
24
STR Special Projects Projects such as Distribution Channel Study
Assisting the GSA for Per Diem Rates User-defined analyses based on STR data, i.e.: Gulf Oil Spill Impact, Katrina Special research for hotel companies, i.e: ramp-up analysis Surveys such as Travel Intention Survey and AHLA Hotel Survey Work with third parties
25
How do we look at hotel data?
26
Running 12-Month Performance Data
Actual Values and/or Percent Changes Running 12-month data removes seasonal variation Historic data allows you to compare performance in different economic cycles Look at “peaks” and “troughs”, rates of decline and rebound Compare multiple metrics to see relationships
27
Total US - Supply and Demand Percent Change
Twelve Month Moving Average, Jan 1989 to Dec 2011 Supply: 3.0% (Sep 09) 0.6% (Dec 11) -0.9% Demand: 7.0% (Aug 09) 7.8% (Feb 11) 5.0% (Dec 11) - 4.6% 2010 saw strongest Demand increase in history and sharp Supply decrease
28
Occupancy leveling, ADR returning, very different recovery than 2002!
Total US – Occupancy and ADR Percent Change Twelve Month Moving Average, Jan 1989 to Dec 2011 ADR: -8.9% (Jan 10) 3.7% (Dec 11) -4.5% 0.0% Occupancy: -9.7% (Sep 09) 6.3% (Apr 11) 4.5% (Dec 11) -3.4% -6.7% Occupancy leveling, ADR returning, very different recovery than 2002!
29
Major challenge for the industry – making up the lost ADR!
Total US - Occupancy & ADR Actual Values Twelve Month Moving Average – Jan 1997 to Dec 2011 Major challenge for the industry – making up the lost ADR!
30
ADR Discounting at Twice the Speed of ADR Recovery Total US Actual ADR, 12 Month Moving Average, Sept ‘08 $108 Dec ‘11 $102 -10% +4.6% 19 Months 19 Months Apr ‘10 $97
31
Seasonally Adjusted Data
Seasonally adjusted data shows more volatility (quicker response) than Running 12-month data. Seasonally adjusted data is calculated using a few simple steps to remove reoccurring seasonal patterns from a time series to better show the underlying trend line. A twelve month moving average is computed and then centered to the middle of the yearly cycle. These averages are then used to calculate “seasonal factors” for each month, which are then applied to the original time series.
32
Total US Occupancy – Seasonally Adjusted and 12-month
Moving Average, January 1989 to August 2011
33
Demand at record high level for most of 2011!
Total US - Actual Monthly Room Demand Millions of Room Nights, Seasonally Adjusted, Jan 1998 to Dec 2011 Demand at record high level for most of 2011!
34
Raw Monthly Data Actual Values and/or Percent Changes
Shows monthly detail Valuable to look at percent changes over time Shows seasonal affects of metrics like Occupancy, ADR, or RevPAR Interesting perspective to show January to December and graph separate years
35
Close up of monthly Supply percent changes for last couple of years
Total US - Monthly Supply Percent Change January 2005 to December 2011 Stuck around 3% for almost a year Close up of monthly Supply percent changes for last couple of years
36
Total US - Historic ADRs for last three years Monthly Numbers, January 2007 – September 2009
2008 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
37
Daily Data Types of daily data: Running 28-day data
Weekday/Weekend data Day of Week data Weekly data Shows performance as of last week Shows closer affects of holidays and special events Can correlate to business vs. leisure travel
38
Total US – Daily Demand & ADR Percent Change Running 28 Day Daily Data - January 1 to October 31, 2009 Labor Day Start of Summer
39
Total US – Occupancy by Day of Week Annual 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011
2011 Occ above 2008 level on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday
40
Total US - ADR by Day of Week Annual 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011
Day of Week 2011 vs ADR diffs: weekdays - $6-7, weekends - $4
41
Segmentation Data Compare Group versus Transient actual metrics and percent changes You can look at monthly, daily, or weekday/weekend data Shows relationships between the different segments Group Demand can be affected more during downturns than Transient Demand Group ADR decreases and recovers more slowly than Transient ADR
42
Transient Occupancy breaks records … Total US Monthly Transient Occupancy – January 2007 to December 2011 Group/Transient data for upper end hotels (Lux, Upper Up, top ⅓ indeps)
43
Above 2009 & 2010 levels, but not above 2007 & 2008
But Transient ADR is not Total US Monthly Transient ADR – January 2007 to December 2011 Above 2009 & 2010 levels, but not above 2007 & 2008
44
Above 2009 & 2010 levels, closing in on 2007 & 2008 levels
Group Occupancy above 2010, but below 2007 levels Total US Monthly Group Occupancy – January 2007 to December 2011 Above 2009 & 2010 levels, closing in on 2007 & 2008 levels
45
Above 2009 & 2010 levels, still below 2007 & 2008
Group ADR improving, but below 2007 & 2008 levels Total US Monthly Group ADR – January 2007 to December 2011 Above 2009 & 2010 levels, still below 2007 & 2008
46
Total US - Group & Transient Demand % Change Running 28 Day – January 31, 2008 to March 28, 2010
10% July 2009 Oct 2008 -20%
47
Total US - Group & Transient Absolute ADR Running 28 Day - January 31, 2008 – August 15, 2009
Group ADR surpasses Transient ADR
48
Total US - Transient Occupancy & ADR % Change Weekday / Weekend (without Sundays) – September 26, YTD ADR almost the same? Transient occupancy much less impacted on weekends 2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
49
Total US - Group Occupancy & ADR % Change Weekday / Weekend (without Sundays) – September 26, YTD
ADR almost the same? Group occupancy less impacted on weekend 2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
50
Pipeline Data Types of data: Hotel openings and closings
Hotels under construction and in planning over time; or by scale, brand, or market Attrition, abandonment, deferrals, and duration Changes to existing supply, conversion activity chain to indep, scale to scale, or brand to brand Provides critical perspective on the future and better understanding of the past
51
Total US - Closed Hotels Annual 2004 through 2011
65,242 rooms in 2005 to 14,265 rooms in 2010 Huge decrease in closed hotels leading up to 2010, small resurge in 2011
52
Total US - Opened Hotels Annual 2004 through 2011
153,623 rooms in ,667 rooms in 2010 Continued decrease in new development in 2011 Significant drop in number of new opens in 2010 and 2011
53
“Accelerated Deceleration” On All Counts
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
54
Top 10 Markets – Rooms Under Construction February 2009 – in Thousands
55
Top 10 Brands – Rooms Under Construction February 2009 – in Thousands
56
STR Pipeline Attrition Rate Long Term Average (2002 – 2009)
57
Total United States - Abandoned Rooms by Month
Total United States - Abandoned Rooms by Month February 2008 – February 2009
58
Total US - Hotel Conversions: Chain → Independent 1990 through 2008
2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
59
HOST (Profit & Loss) Data
Types of P&L data: Additional revenue accounts, total revenue, F&B Expense accounts, i.e. payroll, marketing, A&G, … Profitability measures: GOPPAR, TRevPAR Metrics: Total Dollars Ratio to Sales Amount per Occupied or Available Room Compare over years or different types of hotels
60
Total US - Estimated Total Revenue and Profitability Annual Numbers from 2001 to 2010
Total Revenue and Profit in Billions
61
Additional Data & Perspectives
Hotel Census statistics - property and room counts by various attributes Mapping data - location of hotels or performance Distributions – numbers of properties in ranges “Winners & Losers” – based upon multiple metrics Peaks, valleys, and change – high, low & difference Sellout nights – number of props at occupancy levels Compare hotel performance to economic data Booking channel data
62
Maryland Hotel Census Statistics by Brand, July 2009 YTD
Chain Census Props Census Rooms Sample Props Sample Rooms Marriott 10 3823 Holiday Inn 15 3038 Comfort Inn 27 2925 Courtyard 18 2649 17 2558 Hampton Inn 22 2555 Hilton 8 2464 Sheraton Hotel 2376 Days Inn 2270 Best Western 2059 13 1600 Gaylord Entertainment 1 2000 Residence Inn 1861 Holiday Inn Express Hotel 1675 Hilton Garden Inn 11 1519 Quality Inn 12 1515 Red Roof Inn 1312 Hyatt 3 1278
63
Destination Resorts - Properties: 321 & Rooms: 158,429
64
Lesser participation in Africa and parts of S. America and Mideast
WW STAR Participation Lesser participation in Africa and parts of S. America and Mideast
65
Total United States ADR Percent Change Number of Properties - June 2009 YTD
Industry average: - 8.7
66
Total United States – Occupancy/ADR Winners & Losers Year End 2007 – Quarterly 2008
2008 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
67
Recent ADR Compression by Scale : Threat or Opportunity?
US Chain Scales, Actual ADRs, Peak (2008) vs. Valley ( ) Compression especially at top end, differences narrowed, trade-up easier
68
Average Number of Days Sold Out Total US, Annual Numbers by Day of Week, 2000-2005
2008 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
69
Inflation Adjusted ADRs Currently Well Out Of Reach
$117 2007 ADR Grown By CPI $107 $101 2000 ADR Grown By CPI $85 $85 $104 $107 $109 Total US Actual ADRs and Inflation Adjusted ADR, 2000 – 2013F 2000–2010 CPI from bls.gov, 2011–2013 CPI from Blue Chip Econ Inds
70
Demand Share by Channel for Total US Annual 2009 & 2010 (Percent of Total Room Nights)
Small YOY increases in OTA, Brand.com, GDS Small YOY decreases in CRS/Voice, Prop Direct/Other
71
Comparative Analyses Compare various geographic segments:
Continents - Sub-continents - Countries Regions - States - Markets Tracts - Counties - Zips Compare various non-geographic segments for a specific area: Scale - Class - Location Compare performance for various points in time, i.e.: downturns and recoveries
72
Americas – Occupancy Percent Change
Twelve Month Moving Average – Jan 1999 to Feb 2010 2010 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
73
Selected European Cities
Occupancy & ADR % Change Year End 2009 OCC % Copenhagen Berlin Helsinki Paris Brussels Rome Budapest Zurich Amsterdam Stockholm London ADR % Madrid Prague Athens Moscow
74
US Regions – Occupancy, ADR, & RevPAR % Chg Annual 2009
TOTAL US Occupancy: ▼ -8.7% ADR: ▼ -8.8% RevPAR: ▼ % 2008 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
75
Comparative Gatlinburg Tracts - RevPAR %Chg December 2009 YTD
the best! 2008 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
76
Total United States by Scale Year To Date April 2009
Properties Room Supply Room Revenue 2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.
77
Total US Upper vs Lower End Demand % Change
78
Locations – Demand Percent Change Annual 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011
Urban, Suburban, and Airport big winners in 2010
79
Top 25 Markets - ADR Percent Change, Annual 2011
Wide disparity between top 25 markets
80
Top 25 Markets vs. Rest of US - Quarterly RevPar % Change 1st Quarter 2007 – 2nd Quarter 2009
Top 25 rise faster but also fall farther
81
Three very different economic cycles
Total US – Post-Recession Demand Percent Change 12 Month Moving Average - From Start of Recession, by Month Three very different economic cycles
82
How do others use STR data?
83
STR provides a great deal of data for academic research A partial list follows …
84
Examples Relationship Between Product Quality and RevPAR (1999)
Acquisitions, Openings, and Promotions (1999) Developing the Fill Picture on Hotel Industry Averages (2001) The Influence of Gasoline-price Fluctuations on US Lodging Demand (2002) A Case Study of Virginia Beach Hotels (2002) Impact of NFL Games on Lodging Industry Revenue (2003) Hotel Pricing in a Networked World (2003) A Comparison of Forecasting Methods for Hotel Revenue Management (2003)
85
More examples The Role of Brand Affiliation in Hotel Market Value (2006) Revenue Management with Limited Demand Information (2008) Relationship of Sales and Marketing Expense to Hotel Performance (2008) Competitive Hotel Pricing in Uncertain Times (2009) Falling Industry Profits (2009) Lodging Demand for Urban Hotels in Major Metropolitan Markets Why Discounting Doesn’t Work An Examination of Revenue Management in Relation to Hotels’ Pricing Strategies
86
Even more examples The Agglomeration Conundrum: How Co-location Helps Some Hotels and Hurts Others Why Discounting Still Doesn’t Work: A Hotel Pricing Update Revenue Management in US Hotels: Pricing for Revenue Enhancement in Asian and Pacific Region Hotels: A Study of Relative Pricing Strategies Product Tiers and ADR Clusters: Integrating Two Methods for Determining Hotel Competitive Sets Hotel Rebranding and Rescaling Strategic Hotel Development and Positioning: the Effects of Revenue Drivers on Profitability
87
Performance of Groups of Hotels Over Time
Could be some sort of impact analysis, such as weather related or a special event (hurricane, oil spill, Red Tide, Occupy movement) Could be one or more sets of hotels, also possibly a “control” group Possible to define groups by standard industry fields (single or combinations) or based upon specific hotels. You may need a file to define the groups. STR can produce monthly or daily data for each group
88
Correlating STR data with 3rd parties
There are many situations where people want to correlate the STR performance or P&L data to the data from another organizations Here are a few examples of the 3rd party data: Sustainability/green certification Customer satisfaction or review data Researchers would like to compare the third party data to a metric such as RevPAR or profitability Talk to us more about the options and steps
89
We look forward to working together!
Steve Hood , ext. 3315
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.