Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMelvin Reeves Modified over 9 years ago
1
A & S March 9, 2010
2
Secondary Isolated to one district Elementary All schools received both calibration and non-calibration tests forms Non-calibration forms required rulers Therefore, calibration schools needed rulers FDOE solution: Provide calibration schools with rulers
3
Toward a Balanced Assessment System March 9, 2010
4
Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT
5
Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT
6
Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT
9
CURRICULUM/ ACADEMIC GOALS STAFF SELECTION/ CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMS/PRACTICES/ ARRANGEMENTS MONITORING RECOGNITION/ INTERVENTION © National Center for Educational Accountability Jean Rutherford, Ed. D. Director of Educational Initiatives, NCEA June 24, 2004 The Practices of High-Performing School Districts
10
State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Poor Practice
11
State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Poor Practice > Achievement < Gaps
13
* The average gain in percentile points of the average student in the experimental group compared to the average student in the control group. Marzano, R., 2000; Borman, G.D.; Hewes, G.M. et al., 2000 Research-Based Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum: Opportunity to Learn Percentile Gain* Opportunity to Learn affects student achievement more than double any other school factors.
14
Articulates a rigorous curriculum (clear target) State Standards; FCAT Item Specs Scope and Sequence Monitors extent teachers cover the curriculum Learning Team Meetings Collaborative Planning Has assessments based on the curriculum Diagnostic Tests Benchmark Assessments What to teach? Is it being taught? Are students learning?
16
In classrooms where teachers used formative assessment Rate of learning is double that found in other classrooms Impact larger than most other educational interventions. Particularly effective for students who have not done well in school (OECD, 2005) Black and Wiliam (2004 & 2008)
18
FCAT Tests Diagnostics Common Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts FY09
19
Over 70% of the schools voluntary used the common assessments
20
Students with the highest usage of the Assessment Center Elementary schools: gains in reading and math statistically higher than SDPBC mean. High schools: gains in reading statistically higher than SDPBC mean. SDPBC,DREA, 2009
21
School X
30
FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL School administers screening, diagnostics, and provides remediation, acceleration, and enrichment.
31
FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL District ensures real-time access to student achievement. District prescribes formative (Benchmark mini- assessments) and summative (Benchmark baseline and mid-year) assessments in reading, mathematics, and science for Level 1- 3 students.
32
FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL Data chats are conducted between district administration and school administration; school administration and teachers; and teachers and students following baseline, mini-, and mid-year assessments.
34
4.2 Develops and implements a comprehensive assessment system for assessing progress toward meeting the expectations for student learning 4.3 Uses student assessment data for making decisions for continuous improvement of teaching and learning processes
35
Formative assessment is a national research- based best practice Local research supports the national research External agencies require formative assessments
37
Responses received Vendor selected Negotiations not yet begun
38
Marc Baron – Chief of Performance Accountability Bill Thompson – Director, Assessment Liz Perlman – Elementary District Director, Curriculum Development & School Improvement Hernando Celada – Director, Infrastructure and System Support Debbie Battles – Principal, North Grade Elementary School Sandy Jinks – Principal Palm Springs Middle School Carla Kendall – Manager, Online Assessment Mark Howard – Manager, Educational Technology Heidi Galloway -- Analyst, Diversity and Business Practices
39
Currently negotiating
41
Diagnostic Test Too little time between administrations Some items too difficult Some misalignment of items and benchmarks Tests/items repeated each year Disagreement about correctness of answers Fall Science more difficult than Winter Science
42
Embedded Assessments Print (PDF) format not consistent with online Science text too complex (Lexile) Printing scanner sheets burdensome Problems with teacher logins Rosters don’t match classes Assessments not aligned to instruction Window too early, late, short
43
Embedded Assessments Too many tests Not enough time to prepare for test administration Occasional errors in scoring Unclear about relationship to grading Online technical difficulties Test creation issues Scanner operation issues
45
Fix technology Provide new tests /multiple forms Offer a variety of tests (benchmark and multiple benchmark) Plan tests for entire year Align tests with the Scope and Sequence Provide Diagnostic Assessments for all schools and students
46
Provide schools more flexibility in scheduling tests Align schedule with school and student needs
47
Research-based best practices Research Differentiated Accountability SACS/CASI Accreditation Local Feedback
49
2009-102010-112011-122012-132013-14 Mathematics Reading Science Writing Algebra I Geometry Biology US History Key: FT = Field Test SS = Standard Setting B = Baseline
50
FCAT Tests Diagnostics & EOCs Mini Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts FY11
51
FCAT Tests Diagnostics & EOCs Mini Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Provide Diagnostics & EOCs Provide Mini Assts Provide item bank for teachers ITN
52
Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items
53
Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items
54
Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access
55
Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Data transfers Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items
56
Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests Data transfers Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items
57
Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Provide program management for service, support and PD Data transfers Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items
59
Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests
60
SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school Minis $9.28/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees
61
SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees
62
4.Provide Assessment Center test delivery, collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access
63
Central Data Server Test Item data bank Test Item Authoring Tool Test Assembly Tool INTERNET Test Administration 130k students take tests created by teachers or administrators via computer, scanners, clickers Test Development Test Delivery Access to Results Test Scoring and Reporting Immediate access to student reports by teachers, administrators, and parents Instruction Implications Links to resources for students, teachers, administrators, and parents Data transfers and security protocols Instructional Decision Making
64
SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student Assessment platform $12.22/student (2 yr. build) $9.51/student (per year) * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees
65
SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student Assessment platform $12.22/student (2 yr. build) $9.51/student (per year) $5.30/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees
66
Formative assessment is a national research- based best practice Local research supports the national research External agencies require formative assessments CORE K12 won ITN
67
Planning and alignment Multiple tests School schedule based on needs of school/student Enable district and differentiated accountability schools to meet differentiated accountability assessment requirements Provide non-differentiated accountability schools access to the CORE K12 Diagnostics for all schools and students
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.