1. Ecosystem Services and The Natural Capital Project Emily McKenzie 2 April, InVEST Introductory Seminar, Bangkok

3. Republic of the Marshall Islands

4. Despite their importance, ecosystem services are often not considered in decisions. This is because we lack practical, credible information about their value. The Challenge

5. Outline 1.Ecosystem services – What is the concept? – How is it being applied? 2.Natural Capital Project – Strategy – Content and philosophy of our work

6. Ecosystem Services Links nature & human welfare Integrate environmental values & trade-offs in decisions

7. Nature supports us in countless ways: – stores carbon to slow climate change, – purifies and regulates water supplies, and – provides foods and medicines – provides opportunities for spiritual and cultural experiences The Basics

8. Impact of nature on human well- being known since antiquity History of natural resource management for survival History Bust of Plato From 1960s on, “environmental services” coined, ecological economics developed First global studies and analyses

9. First global assessment of ecosystem services 2001-2005, 1360 scientists Over the last 50 years, out of 24 services: – 15 have seriously declined – 4 have shown some improvement – 5 are generally stable but under threat in some parts of the world Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

10. ES = The benefits that people obtain from ecosystems Provisioning services - goods like food, water, timber, and fiber; Regulating services - stabilize climate, moderate risk of flooding and disease, protect water quality; Cultural services - recreational, aesthetic, educational, spiritual benefits; and Supporting services - underpin the others, e.g. photosynthesis, nutrient cycling, preservation of future options Definition and Categorization

11. Natural Capital  the goods and services from nature which are essential for human life Well-being - considering the impacts on people of having or losing these benefits NatCap Approach

12. Why assess ecosystem services? Important for human wellbeing and prosperity More comprehensive accounting of impacts Engage a wider array of stakeholders Generate financing for conservation Innovative policy mechanisms

13. New tools to help General assessments of ES – Reports – E.g. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, TEEB Assessments of dependence and impact on ES – Work books – E.g. WRI’s Corporate Ecosystem Services Review, Impact Assessment Review, Mapping of ES under alternative scenarios – Software tools – E.g. InVEST, ARIES

14. –Tools: Make it easy to quantify ecosystem services –Evidence: Test tools, improve decisions, share stories –Influence: Inspire policy change globally

15. Introducing the team Terrestrial & freshwater science Marine science

16. Standing on the shoulders of many…

17. …giants

18. Unlike the accounting tools we apply to measure the value of traditional economic goods and services… we have no ready set of existing accounting tools to measure the value of ecosystem services. Absent these, ecosystem services are invariably undervalued or not valued at all – by governments, businesses, and the public. Who and what will catalyze the next giant step forward? Part of the answer lies with improving science. Gretchen Daily, 2011 NatCap’s Vision

19. ? ?? ? Effects of management decisions $ $ $ $ lbs of fish # of tourists # of people mangroves protect Health of corals

20. 20 Success = inform decisions –How would a proposed dam or logging project affect ecosystem services and biodiversity? –What would be the best marine spatial plan for balancing different stakeholders’ goals? –How would upstream deforestation affect the quality & quantity of water downstream? –Where might REDD and payments for watershed services projects be feasible? ANSWERS: Accounting tools for quantifying ES

21. Filling the Gap Policy decisions: Region/landscape scale Short timeline Forward looking, comparative Assess tradeoffs Policy decisions: Region/landscape scale Short timeline Forward looking, comparative Assess tradeoffs GLOBAL, SYNTHETIC 60% of global ES in decline (MA, 2005) $33 Trillion/y (Costanza et al. 1997 Nature) LOCAL, SPECIFIC 2 forest patches: $60K/yr (Ricketts, 2004. PNAS) 22 others (just for pollination!)

22. Ecosystem service framework InVEST: Quantify, map & value ecosystem services under alternative scenarios Photo credit: Neil Burgess

23. China Tanzania California Hawai’i Amazon Basin Colombia Ecuador WCVI, B.C. Belize Chesapeake Bay Puget Sound Galveston Bay Terrestrial & Freshwater Coastal & Marine Borneo and Sumatra Albertine Rift New England Applications around the world

24. Many decision contexts Decision ContextGeography Spatial Planning Tanzania, Indonesia, British Columbia, Hawai’i, China, Belize Ecosystem-based management (terrestrial-marine links) USA (Puget Sound, Galveston & Chesapeake Bays) Climate adaptationUSA - Galveston & Monterey Bays Payments for ecosystem services Colombia (water funds), Indonesia (REDD), Borneo, Tanzania Impact assessment, permitting, licensingColombia (mining) Multilateral development bank investments World Bank in Malawi Corporate strategyLafarge in Michigan, USA

25. Support policy and practice globally Researchers – TEEB – Academic collaborators around the world Governments – GEOBON – IPBES Multilaterals and donors – World Bank & WAVES – UNEP, UNDP – Millennium Challenge Corporation Business – World Business Council for Sustainable Development – Business for Social Responsibility – Multilateral companies e.g. Dow, Coke And many more…

26. Any questions? www.naturalcapitalproject.org