Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAM UPDATE Jody Campiche Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAM UPDATE Jody Campiche Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University."— Presentation transcript:

1 2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAM UPDATE Jody Campiche Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University

2 Disclaimer  This information is based on my reading of the 2014 farm bill and discussions with Congressional Agriculture Committee staff  I know there will likely be differences in my interpretation and the final rules and regulations  This information is intended to be for educational purposes only  Additional information will be available before most decisions need to be made

3 Covered Commodity Programs

4 Covered Commodities  Covered commodities include wheat, oats, barley, corn, grain sorghum, long grain rice, medium grain rice, pulse crops, soybeans, other oilseeds and peanuts  Upland cotton is no longer a covered commodity

5 Eliminated Programs

6 New Programs CROP INSURANCE COMMODITY PROGRAMS

7  Distinction between programs tied to base acres and programs tied to planted acres  This part gets a bit confusing  Payment limits exist for commodity programs but not for crop insurance programs  As the program is currently specified, cotton producers would no longer be subject to payment limits since both STAX and SCO would have no payment limits  Combined payment limit for ARC/PLC/MLG/LDP – could have different implications for different regions  SCO and STAX cost money! Important Points

8  The decision to enroll in ARC/PLC varies by crop, region, farm size, etc…  SCO may not be an attractive option for some crops/regions/farms

9 Farm Program Choices

10 Plant a different crop than base crop

11  Interaction between programs  Choices will all take place at different times  This may be particularly confusing for ARC/PLC and SCO No SCO for 2014 crop year SCO sign-up for the 2015 crop year will occur before ARC/PLC sign-up for the 2014 crop year (for fall planted wheat) For other crops, producers may enroll in 2014 ARC/PLC prior to 2015 SCO enrollment Farm Program Choices

12 2014 crop year: 1. Retain or update base acres – fall 2014 2. Retain or update payment yields – fall 2014 3. Enroll in PLC, ARC county, or ARC individual – late 2014/early 2015 2015 crop year: 1. Option to enroll in SCO (producer) – fall 2014 for winter wheat or spring 2015  Not an option for crops/farms enrolled in ARC 2. Choose individual insurance policy (RP, YP, other) coverage – fall 2014 or spring 2015 Important note: SCO enrollment for 2015 fall planted wheat will occur in Sept. 2014

13 Important Program Details

14 Payment Acres ARC/PLC paid on base acres Do NOT have to plant to receive ARC/PLC on base acres (not including cotton base acres) ARC/PLC payments are not automatic like direct payments Two types of base acres: Total base acres (non-cotton acres) Generic base acres (old cotton acres)

15 Reallocation of Base Acres Option to retain or reallocate total base acres to crops planted in 2009-2012 – cannot update cotton base acres Generic cotton acres cannot be reallocated Can receive ARC/PLC on generic cotton acres if another crop is planted on those acres

16 Reallocation of Base Acres Reallocation is in proportion to the ratio of the 4-year avg of planted acres for each covered commodity Ex: Producer has 80 acres of wheat base In the past 4 years, planted 160 acres - 40 acres of wheat (25%) and 120 acres of corn (75%) Can retain 80 wheat base acres or reallocate 25% to wheat and 75% to corn (so 20 wheat base acres and 60 corn base acres)

17 Yield Update Option to update payment yields Only applies to PLC in the 2014 farm bill but the update is separate from the ARC/PLC decision ARC not tied to payment yields Updated payment yield will be 90% of the average of the yield per planted acre for the 2008-2012 crop years If the yield for any of the 2008-2012 crop years is < 75% of the average of the 2008-2012 county yields, a yield plug of 75% of the avg 2008-2012 county yield will be used

18 PLC vs. ARC Commodity-by-commodity and farm-by-farm decision (except farm-level ARC – must select farm-level ARC for all commodities on a farm #) One time decision in late 2014 or early 2015 (for remainder of 2014 farm bill)

19 PLC PLC – price protection Payment if actual price < reference price Similar to CCP in 2008 farm bill Key difference: Higher reference prices

20 PLC Crop2008 FB CCP Target Price PLC Reference Price Barley2.244.95 Corn2.633.70 Cotton0.7125NA Grain Sorghum2.573.95 Peanuts495535 Oats1.442.40 Rice10.5014.00 Soybeans5.808.40 Wheat3.925.50

21 ARC ARC – revenue protection Option to choose farm or county level coverage Farm paid on 65% of base (includes whole farm revenue) County paid on 85% of base Similar to ACRE in 2008 farm bill Key differences: County level trigger (ACRE had a STATE/farm trigger) Payment limited to 10% of the benchmark revenue (ACRE payment limited to 25% of benchmark) Huge difference for OK wheat ($45-$60 ACRE payment compared to $16-$20 ARC payment)

22 ARC  Farm-level ARC is a whole-farm revenue program  Farm-level ARC might trigger payments more frequently than county-level ARC but producers would receive a payment on 20% less base acreage  With county-level coverage, a producer could have a loss on his own farm, but would not receive a payment if the county does not suffer a loss as well  Producers with yields that do not follow closely with the county average may want to consider farm-level ARC

23 PLC vs. County ARC PLCARC County Guarantee Reference PriceCounty Revenue Benchmark YieldFSA program yields5 yr Olympic Average county yield Benchmark PriceReference Price5 yr Oly Avg max (MYA Price, Reference Price) Benchmark Guarantee Reference Price86% * Benchmark Price * Benchmark Yield Actual YieldNACounty yield Actual RevenueNACounty yield * MYA Price Payment Acres85% * base acres85% * base acres (30% of PP) Maximum Payment None (except for $125K combined payment limit) 10% * Benchmark Revenue (and $125K combined payment limit)

24 SCO  Shallow loss insurance program that covers county- wide losses and complements a producer’s individual insurance policy  Requires that producers purchase an underlying insurance policy  Covers the difference between 86% and the level of coverage of the producer’s individual insurance policy  65% subsidy

25 SCO  County-level policy endorsement that is in addition to an underlying crop insurance policy  Covers a portion of losses not covered by the same crop’s underlying policy  Producers who elect to participate in ARC are not eligible for SCO for the crop and farm participating in ARC

26 SCO – Winter Wheat  Producers applying for SCO for the 2015 winter wheat crop may withdraw coverage on any farm where intend to elect ARC for winter wheat by the earlier of their acreage reporting date or Dec. 15, without penalty (and will not be charged a crop insurance premium)  Allows producers additional time to make an informed decision about ARC or PLC for winter wheat

27 SCO Covered Commodities: 2015 crop year  Corn  Cotton  Grain sorghum  Rice  Soybeans  Spring barley  Spring wheat  Winter wheat

28 SCO – OK Counties (Winter Wheat) AlfalfaGarvinNoble BeaverGradyOklahoma BeckhamGrantOttawa BlaineGreerPayne CaddoHarmonRoger Mills CanadianHarperTexas CimarronJacksonTillman ComancheKayWagoner CottonKingfisherWashita CusterKiowaWoods DeweyLoganWoodward EllisMajor GarfieldMcClain

29 SCO Expected Area Yields Alfalfa 35.3 Jackson 27.2 Beaver 27.3 Kay 30.6 Beckham 21.7 Kingfisher 30.2 Blaine 27.5 Kiowa 26.7 Caddo 30.5 Logan 31.3 Canadian 30.9 Major 30.3 Cimarron 20.7 McClain 31.7 Comanche 23.7 Noble 25.4 Cotton 24.0 Oklahoma 33.2 Custer 28.5 Ottawa 33.1 Dewey 26.5 Payne 26.5 Ellis 21.5 Roger Mills 24.5 Garfield 33.2 Texas 33.5 Garvin 31.9 Tillman 26.2 Grady 28.1 Wagoner 31.7 Grant 32.5 Washita 27.6 Greer 24.2 Woods 31.8 Harmon 26.6 Woodward 26.5 Harper 25.4

30 SCO: Slightly Confusing PLC/ARC Details  Example 1  Producer has 100 acres wheat base and enrolls the wheat in ARC – plants 100 acres of wheat – CANNOT enroll wheat in SCO  Example 2  Producer has 100 acres of wheat base, enrolls the wheat in ARC - plants 100 acres of corn – CAN enroll the corn in SCO

31 SCO/RP/YP/ARC/PLC Decisions  Is SCO offered for your crop/county for 2015?  Is ARC a better option for your crop/farm?  Is your base acreage different than your current planted acreage?  Will you reallocate base acreage?  What is your current RP/YP coverage level?  What is the cost of higher RP/YP coverage?  Do you have enterprise units?

32 Upland Cotton

33 Cotton Safety Net  Reduced direct payment, called a transition payment, in 2014 (and possibly 2015) Since cotton is not eligible for ARC/PLC and STAX isn’t available until 2015 Payment on 60% of base acres in 2014 Payment on 36.5% of base acres in 2015 (if STAX isn’t available in the county)  Marketing loan support  STAX - area-wide revenue insurance program  SCO

34 STAX  STAX coverage can range from 90% of the county revenue guarantee to 70% or the coverage level of the underlying policy (if there is one) whichever is higher  An individual policy is not required with STAX  80% subsidy

35 SCO vs. STAX  Upland cotton producers have the option to elect SCO instead of STAX for planted cotton acreage  Key differences  With SCO, the producer’s APH yield is used to calculate the liability  Higher subsidy with STAX  Different yields used in calculation?

36 OSU/KSU Decision Tool

37

38

39 Results

40 Questions? Jody Campiche jody.campiche@okstate.edu 405-744-9811


Download ppt "2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAM UPDATE Jody Campiche Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google