Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJonathan Lloyd Modified over 9 years ago
1
Embedded System Lab Kim Jong Hwi Chonbuk National University Introduction to Intelligent Robots
2
Chonbuk National University Chapter Objectives Define what the reactive paradigm List the characteristics of a reactive robotic system Describe the two dominant methods for combining behaviors in a reactive architecture: subsumption and potential field summation Be able to program a behavior using a potential field methodology Be able to construct a new potential field form primitive potential fields, and sum potential fields to generate an emergent behavior
3
Chonbuk National University
4
The Reactive Paradigm emerged in the late 1980’s grew out of dissatisfaction with the hierarchical paradigm -summarized by Roney Brooks
5
Chonbuk National University The Reactive Paradigm layered in a vertical decomposition access to sensors and actuators independently
6
Chonbuk National University Attributes of Reactive Paradigm all actions are accomplished through behaviors motor schema : algorithm for generating the pattern of action in physical actuator perceptual schema : algorithm for extracting the percept and its strength
7
Chonbuk National University S-A organization
8
Chonbuk National University Behavior-specific sensing organization in the Reactive Paradigm
9
Chonbuk National University Connotations of reactive behaviors executes rapidly have no memory
10
Chonbuk National University 5 Characteristics of reactive behaviors Robots are situated agents operating in an ecological niche Behaviors serve as the basic building blocks for robotic actions, and the overall behavior of the robot is emergent Only local, behavior-specific sensing is permitted These systems inherently follow good software design principle Animal models of behavior are often cited as a basis for these systems or a particular behavior
11
Chonbuk National University Representative architectures Subsumption – how behaviors are combined Potential Field Methodologies – require behaviors to be implemented as potential fields and the behaviors are combined by summation of the fields Rule encoding, fuzzy methods, winner-take-all voting …
12
Chonbuk National University Subsumption architecture Rodney Brooks’s architecture the most influential of the purely Reactive Paradigm systems
13
Chonbuk National University Subsumption architecture Modules are grouped into layers of competence (low layer ~ high layer) Modules in a higher layer can override, or subsume, the output from behaviors in the next lower layer The use of internal state is avoided A task is accomplished by activating the appropriate layer
14
Chonbuk National University Example
15
Chonbuk National University Level 0 recast as primitive behaviors
16
Chonbuk National University Level 1 : wander
17
Chonbuk National University Level 1 recast as primitive behaviors
18
Chonbuk National University Level 2 : follow corridors
19
Chonbuk National University Potential Field force field on the surrounding space exerted from perceivable objects Vector – Magnitude; real number between 0.0 and 1 – Direction
20
Chonbuk National University Potential Field
21
Chonbuk National University Potential Field
22
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
23
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
24
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
25
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
26
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
27
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
28
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
29
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
30
Chonbuk National University Programming a single potential Field
31
Chonbuk National University Advantages and disadvantages Advantages – easy to visualize over a large region of space – easier for the designer to visualize the robot’s overall behavior – easy to combine fields, and languages such as C++ – well works behaviors developed for 2D in 3D inviroment Disadvantages –Local minima (vector with 0 magnitude) » producing vectors with a small magnitude from random noise »NaTs (navigation templates)
32
Chonbuk National University Summary subsumption and potential fields appear to be largely equivalent in practice The ease of portability to other domains is relative to the complexity of the changes in the task and enviroment Neither style of architecture explicitly addresses robustness
33
Chonbuk National University33 Thank you for listening!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.