Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoella Briggs Modified over 9 years ago
1
A Search For Fragmentation in Starless Cores with ALMA Scott Schnee (NRAO) Hector Arce, Tyler Bourke, Xuepeng Chen, James Di Francesco, Michael Dunham, Doug Johnstone, Stella Offner, Jaime Pineda, Daniel Price, Sarah Sadavoy 28-July-2014
2
Turbulence Scales With Size (Larson 1981) Log size of cloud (pc) Log line width (km/s)
3
Line Width is Constant on Small Scales (Pineda et al. 2011) Core properties d ≈ 0.1 pc n ≈ 10 4-6 cm -3 T ≈ 10 K M ≈ 1-10 M c s ≈ 0.2 km/s σ ≈ 0.1-0.2 km/s Does fragmentation continue down to smaller scales?
4
Project Idea Choose a promising sample of starless cores Look for evidence for fragmentation – Yes: support for turbulent fragmentation – No: support for disk fragmentation? Observe cores with mm interferometers – Provides high spatial resolution – Dust continuum provides unambiguous mass tracer
5
CARMA – Big Pine, California Antenna numbers, sizes 6 x 10.4m, 9 x 6.1m, 8 x 3.5m
6
Sample 1 3mm continuum survey of 11 starless cores Chosen from Enoch et al. (2006; 2008) Bolocam 1.1mm survey of Perseus Starless status based on Spitzer NIR-MIR data Peak fluxes >200 mJy beam -1 in Bolocam data Median mass of 1.47 M ⊙ Median density of 3.2×10 5 cm −3
7
Observed with CARMA 3mm continuum – 5” resolution – 40” largest angular scale Follow-up observations with – CARMA (3mm spectral lines) – SMA (1.3mm continuum, CO J=2-1) – Spitzer (70 μm continuum) Sample 1
8
CARMA & SZA 3mm Continuum (Schnee et al. 2010) 0.01 pc
9
Perbo58 and Perbo 45 as Protostars Greyscale and Green contours: 1.3mm continuum emission Red and blue contours: Red and blue-shifted CO (2-1) emission (0.3-7.3 & 7.3-14.3 km/s) (Dunham, Chen, Arce, Bourke, Schnee, & Enoch 2011) (also: Schnee, Di Francesco, Enoch, Friesen, Johnstone, & Sadavoy 2012)
10
SMA – Mauna Kea, Hawaii Antenna numbers, sizes 8 x 6m
11
Sample 2 1.3mm continuum and CO (2-1) survey of 5 starless cores Chosen from Sadavoy et al. (2010) SCUBA 850 μm survey of nearby molecular clouds Starless status based on Spitzer NIR-MIR data Observed with SMA in compact configuration – 1.3mm continuum – 12 CO (2-1), 13 CO (2-1), C 18 O (2-1), N 2 D + (3-2) – 3” resolution – 8” largest angular scale
12
Per 8 as a Protostar Black: 1.3mm continuum (0.1 – 0.5 Jy/beam) Red: 12 CO (2-1) T int 9 km/s ≤ v ≤ 18 km/s Blue: 12 CO (2-1) T int -2 km/s ≤ v ≤ 5 km/s Color contours at 3, 6, …, 21 K km/s Black: C 18 O T int in intervals of 2 K km/s Color: C 18 O VLSR (Schnee, Sadavoy, Di Francesco, Johnstone & Wei 2012) 12 CO and continuumC 18 O and continuum
13
ALMA – Atacama Desert, Chile Antenna numbers, sizes 32 x 12m, 9 x 7m (Cycle 1) 54 x 12m, 12 x 7m (Full Science)
14
Sample 3 3mm continuum and CO (1-0) survey of 72 starless and protostellar cores Chosen from Belloche et al. (2011) LABOCA 1mm survey of Chamaeleon I Starless / protostellar status based on NIR data Observed with ALMA in Cycle 1 – 3” resolution – 25” largest angular scale
15
CARMA, SMA, and ALMA Projects ArrayResolutionFrequency (GHz) rms (mJy) rms (M ) # sourcesTime per source CARMA5”10010.21110 hours SMA3”23010.0253 hours ALMA3”1150.10.01721.2 minutes
16
ALMA 3mm Continuum 0.01 pc Every Starless Core (Schnee et al. in prep.)
17
ALMA 3mm Continuum 0.01 pc Double source Single source (Schnee et al. in prep.)
18
ALMA Results Starless Cores – No continuum detection FHSC candidate Chamaeleon-MMS1 – Extended 3mm continuum detected Protostars – 19 cores with 3mm continuum (point-like) – 25 total protostellar candidates detected – new YSO candidates 7 not found in Dunham et al. (2013) 2 not found in Winston et al. (2012) (Schnee et al. in prep.)
19
Simulations of Turbulent Fragmentation in Starless Cores (Offner, Capodilupo, Schnee, & Goodman 2011) Simulated ALMA Full Science + ACA observations
20
Summary Observational evidence for fragmentation in starless cores? – Not yet. – Low levels of turbulence in starless cores leads to low levels of fragmentation – Multiplicity set at protostellar stage? Disk fragmentation? – More sensitive observations needed? Interferometric observations in the millimeter or submillimeter can find hidden protostars – Up to 20% of “starless” cores are actually protostars
21
L1451-mm: Another Hidden Protostar (Pineda, Arce, Schnee et al. 2011)
22
L1451-mm: Another Hidden Protostar Black Contours: SMA 1.3mm continuum Blue Contours: Blue-shifted CO (2-1) 1.9-3.7 km/s Red Contours: Red-shifted CO (2-1) 5.3 – 6.9 km/s (Pineda, Arce, Schnee et al. 2011)
23
Starless Cores Are Not Detected by CARMA 1.Offset from (0,0) position given in Enoch et al. (2006) 2.Derived from Gaussian fit to flux distribution 3.Deconvolved using the synthesized beam 4.For non-detections, 3σ upper limits to a point source are given 5.Does not include SZA data, so some 3mm emission is resolved out (Schnee et al. 2010)
24
Sample 2 3.2 M ⊙ ≤ M ≤ 8.1 M ⊙ 2.1 ≤ M/M J ≤ 4.9
25
Starless Cores Are Not Detected by SMA 3σ upper limits for non-detections < 0.02 M ⊙ (Schnee, Sadavoy, Di Francesco, Johnstone & Wei 2012)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.