1. 1 Does a Dense Atmosphere Exist Around Io? John Menke X X June 2014 X

2. 2

3. 3 Origin of Study Degenhardt papers SAS2010, 2013, etc Observed Io(F)/Europa(R) occultations (video) Observed dimming before/after occultation (wings) Interpreted as dimming from thick atmosphere (Jovian Extinction Events..JEE) My investigation was for a decision whether to take data in 2014 (I decided not to)

4. 4 Degenhardt observations (two observations of many) X Wings X X

5. 5 X F&R in line R in shadows Eclipse R F Occultation R F Earth,F&R in perfect line R likely not in shadows Images converge Images do NOT converge

6. 6 Critical Problems Pro-Astronomers see no thick atmosphere Eclipses show no wings Duplicate observations show null results

7. 7 Pro-Astronomers see no thick atmosphere Telescopic searches w/big scopes and HST have never imaged atmosphere s Satellite probes near Jupiter see none Satellites within 200km of Io saw/felt none, would literally have slowed down or burned up See Mallama paper for details #1. The Galileo Orbiter flew within a few hundred km of Io and Europa, yet spacecraft navigation experts found no atmospheric drag in the radio tracking data. #2. Images of Io and Europa taken by the Hubble Space Telescope reveal no atmospheres surrounding these satellites. #3.An examination of 50 Hubble images taken in ultraviolet, visible and infrared light when Io or Europa were transiting Jupiter show that there is no extinction due to an extended atmosphere. #4. An examination of 19 high quality PHEMU light curves, where Io or Europa occulted another satellite and in which data was taken well outside of the occultation itself, show no evidence for atmospheric extinction. #5. Decades of research conducted by world-class planetary scientists using all the available Earth- based and spacecraft data have conclusively shown that Io and Europa only possess extremely rarified exospheres whose particle densities are billions of times less than the Earth’s troposphere. Advanced spectroscopic searches w/big scopes show only very faint (10^-9) atmospheres Note: JEE references out of context) 1 Extended JEE atmosphere not gravitationally feasible (Menke)

8. 8 Eclipses show no wings, but they should Io atmosphere should cast shadow during eclipse, but not seen No explanation 2

9. 9 Duplicate observations show null results [No physics basis for PDE or threshold presented] Others also see no wings, eg Gerhard Dengl (one of many) s Redding (in JEE group) had null observations explained adhoc -PDE, threshold (no physics, no predictive value) s 20090901 occult 1000 sec 3

10. 10 Any ONE of the foregoing problems is a fatal flaw for JEE JEE does not exist if even ONE of these is true

11. 11 Photometric methods not used (eg, ref, linearity) Inadequate documentation Why video, why not CCD observations, no confirmations from am or pro Lesser Problems Overly defensive criticism of objections, many words, but non-rebuttal on physics

12. 12 But if not real, what was it? Instrumental-potential for video non-linearity Some other Jovian effect-hard to think of one Analytical (eg., software)-Lots of data, but only LiMovie used X X Obtained video data from Degenhardt of six events

13. 13 Typical video frame... Ganymede Jupiter Io/Europa Callisto Event 20090901

14. 14 Technique:Convert video to JPGs Use VirtualDub to select ~100 frames Export/ImageSequence/..JPG Paste into Maxim or other photometry prog, examine pixels, take averages, etc.

15. 15 Test:Did I reproduce wings? VideoData LiMovie VideoData JPGs MaximDL YES Wings NOT an artifact of processing Test validates JPG/photometry methods YES Analytical problem? Only thing left is a sensor/system problem..

16. 16 Video non-linearity concerns Gamma used in video Saturation and Roll-Off issues.. Video cams not tightly specified Output=input ^ gamma Gamma=1 linear Gamma applied in camera and/or LiMovie Hidden algorithms, large/small scale features

17. 17 Actual saturation – 8bit=255 limit Linearity/roll-off not measured X Saturation and Roll-Off issues, cont Unknown behavior approaching saturation (Roll-Off)

18. 18 Test: Linearity (when no sat).. Convert to JPGs, measure ratio intensities Yes, sensor appears roughly linear Dimming (wing) Linear Video PredictionActual (I+E)/ Gany Gany /Cal (I+E)/ Gany Gany /Cal 0120UT1.202.751.192.66 0200UT1.202.751.07*2.43... Can we tell whether system is generally linear? If generally linear, then how about saturation or Roll-Off?

19. 19 What is happening in images? During occultation, images merge (During eclipse, do not merge) X Saturation MUST cause light loss and, ANY saturation shows out of control X X

20. 20 Can saturation cause wings? Qualitative, features only X Saturation is plausible cause of wings Software, slide one PSF over another, measure intensity Can adjust saturation, gamma, spacing, noise, etc Simulate saturation…

21. 21 Is saturation present in JEE video? Convert to JPGs, inspect all objects, different times, Jupiter-heavily saturated Ganymede-seldom saturated Io/Europa-increasing saturated pixels as merger/ occultation proceeds (Io+E>G) Callisto (faintest) – never saturated Yes, extensive Io/E saturation present in all JEE events (but not in Null observations) Note:LiMovie poor tool for evaluating video, so used photometric methods

22. 22 Typical frame near occultation X X X X X Io Saturation

23. 23 Is the saturation sufficient? Note-Io+Europa = 1.2xGanymede..use G. as surrogate Multiply Ganymede pixels by 1.2, measure intensity: gives UNsaturated equiv. of Io+Europa Apply saturation limits (tool in Maxim) Remeasure intensity.. gives SATurated equiv of Io+Europa Result—Saturation dims intensity 10-14% ~same as wings Hard to measure or calculate – lost information. Use surrogate:

24. 24 One last item.. Remember - some JEE group occultation videos show NO wings (PDE, etc given as cause) But examining video data shows they were taken with longer fl scope-larger images, lower pixel values, no sat. plus, other video observers do not see wings when properly using video

25. 25 Conclusions 3 critical problems w/JEE: astronomic data, eclipses, other observers null results, plus Saturation in video is shown sufficient to cause apparent dimming (JEE wings) Root problem-insufficient attention to sensor, and failure to use photometric methods Interpretation of data incorrect: there is no thick Io atmosphere X

26. 26 Comments on “the debate”… Given the extraordinary claim, one must resolve, not bypass, all the major problems before taking JEE seriously One can ALWAYS make arguments and find some data to support any view, but critical thinking (and Occam) is key in evaluating Most of our debates are political debates about values: This is a scientific debate about evidence and physics. JEE is true or it is not Continued debate or investigation after a problem is solved may be a sign of bad science.