1. Bioe 109 Evolution Summer 2009 Lecture 2-Part I The Darwinian Revolution

2. Little bit history……. Various “theories” about how the world and all living beings were created exist in all major cultures and religions of the world! Explaining the workings of natural world was the realm of philosophers. e.g. Greek philosopher Anaximander (610-546 BC) wrote about the sudden appearance of humans from fish-like creatures.

3. This is “spontaneous generation”, not evolution!

4. Two characteristics of spontaneous generation were common to early Greek philosophers:

5. Two characteristics of spontaneous generation were common to early Greek philosophers: 1. Resulted from the generative powers of nature (i.e., not actions of a God).

6. Two characteristics of spontaneous generation were common to early Greek philosophers: 1. Resulted from the generative powers of nature (i.e., not actions of a God). 2. Were nonteleological (i.e., without an underlying design or goal).

7. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC)

8. - a great naturalist - first to study life-histories - concept of “adaptive significance” - initiated science of systematics

9. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1. All species are fixed and eternal

10. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1. All species are fixed and eternal evolution not possible!

11. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1. All species are fixed and eternal evolution not possible! 2. The philosophy of essentialism

12. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1. All species are fixed and eternal evolution not possible! 2. The philosophy of essentialism each species represented by its “eidos”

13. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1. All species are fixed and eternal evolution not possible! 2. The philosophy of essentialism each species represented by its “eidos” variation among individuals of a species is not “real”, nor important.

14. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 3. The scala naturae or “great chain of being”

15. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 3. The scala naturae or “great chain of being” refers to a linear progression of organisms from most simple to most complex.

16. The influence of Aristotle (384-322 BC) 3. The scala naturae or “great chain of being” refers to a linear progression of organisms from most simple to most complex. over time, believed to reflect the actions of a creator.

17. A 1579 drawing of the scala naturae

18. The chain of being, from Charles Bonnet Œuvres d'histoire naturelle et de philosophie, 1779-83) © 2006 UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

19. Some more “theories”….. 1.Continuous Creation perpetual intervention of creator

20. Some more “theories”….. 1.Continuous Creation perpetual intervention of creator 2. Deistic Theory belief in teleological, evolutionary laws laws lead to ever greater perfection and adaptation

21. How did evolutionary thinking develop?

22. 1. The scientific revolution

23. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 1. The scientific revolution Astronomy  earth not the center of the universe!

24. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 1. The scientific revolution Astronomy  earth not the center of the universe! Geology  evidence for great age of earth, study of fossils

25. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 1. The scientific revolution Astronomy  earth not the center of the universe! Geology  evidence for great age of earth, study of fossils 2. The discovery of new faunas

26. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 1. The scientific revolution Astronomy  earth not the center of the universe! Geology  evidence for great age of earth, study of fossils 2. The discovery of new faunas 3. Extinction

27. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 4. The microscope

28. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 4. The microscope provided support for “spontaneous generation”.

29. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 4. The microscope provided support for “spontaneous generation”. 5. Development of the science of systematics

30. How did evolutionary thinking develop? 4. The microscope provided support for “spontaneous generation”. 5. Development of the science of systematics undermined the scala naturae.

31. Evolution according to Lamarck (1744-1829)

32. Evolution according to Lamarck (1744-1829) Recognized two causes of evolutionary change:

33. Evolution according to Lamarck (1744-1829) Recognized two causes of evolutionary change: 1. Life has an innate potential to acquire greater and greater complexity.

34. Evolution according to Lamarck (1744-1829) Recognized two causes of evolutionary change: 1. Life has an innate potential to acquire greater and greater complexity. - now called “orthogenesis”.

35. Recognized two causes of evolutionary change: 1. Life has an innate potential to acquire greater and greater complexity. now called “orthogenesis”. 2. Organisms “reacted” to their environments and changed form.

36. Recognized two causes of evolutionary change: 1. Life has an innate potential to acquire greater and greater complexity. now called “orthogenesis”. 2. Organisms “reacted” to their environments and changed form. changes were then transmitted to subsequent generations.

37. Recognized two causes of evolutionary change: 1. Life has an innate potential to acquire greater and greater complexity. now called “orthogenesis”. 2. Organisms “reacted” to their environments and changed form. changes were then transmitted to subsequent generations. now referred to as the “inheritance of acquired characteristics” or “soft inheritance”.

38. Lamarck’s theory of organic progression

39. Evolution according to Charles Darwin (1809-1882) - publication of “On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life” or simply “The origin” occurred in 1859.

40. Darwin had two main objectives in writing this book

41. Darwin’s objectives: 1. To make the case that evolution had occurred.

42. Darwin’s objectives: 1. To make the case that evolution had occurred. 2. To provide a mechanism for how evolutionary change occurs.

43. Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913) Co-discoverer of theory of natural selection Father of biogeography Wallace line Warning coloration in animals Wallace effect: natural selection could contribute to speciation by encouraging development of barriers against hybridization

44. Magnificent bird-of-paradise Tree Kangaroo Rhinoceros hornbill Sumatran tiger The Wallace Line

45. Additional suggested reading National Geographic Dec 2008 issue: The Other Darwin Natural selection and beyond: the intellectual legacy of Alfred Russel Wallace/ edited by Charles H. Smith and George Beccaloni Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2008. Where Worlds Collide: the Wallace Line/ Penny Van Oosterzee Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press, 1997