Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006.

Published byAda Smith Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006."— Presentation transcript:

1 Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006

2 Definitions Data Set – The data consist of the total credit course enrollments for grades (i.e. minus audits and classes dropped or deleted prior to census) in Fall, 2005. N=10,223 This is a duplicate count. That is, if a single student enrolled in 4 courses in fall semester, they would equate to 4 data points in the overall data set.

3 Definitions Success Rate – the percentage of students who complete a credit course with a grade of “A,” “B,” “C,” “P,” “IP,” or “PR.” Non-Success Rate – the percentage of students who complete a credit course with a grade of “D,” “F,” or “I.” Withdrawal Rate – the percentage of students who drop a credit course after the census date

4 Definitions Full-Time – Students enrolled for 12 credits or more in Fall 2005 Part-Time – Students enrolled for less than 12 credits in Fall 2005 Degree-Seeking – Students who have declared a major as of Fall 2005 Non-Degree-Seeking – Students who have not declared a major as of Fall 2005

5 Interpreting the Data What should be an overall benchmark goal? Common sense versus statistical models How much difference makes a difference?

6 Why course completion? Basic student retention data must account for at least 2 important variables –Student intent to persist –Environmental variables Course completion data accounts for student intent Course completion leads to retention which leads to graduation

7 How the data were analyzed Student Success Rate Student Non-Success Rate Student Withdrawal Rate Comparing these Rates by: Full-Time/Part-Time Status Student Demographics (Age/Gender/Ethnicity) Developmental English and Math Gateway English and Math Online

8 College Credit Course Success By Student Type Full-TimePart-Time Number% % Success 3,46976.2% 4,27375.8% Nonsucces s 4058.9% 3656.5% Withdraw 68014.9% 1,00017.7% Total 4,554100.0% 5,638100.0%

9 College Credit Course Success By Student Ethnicity White-Non- HispanicHispanic Number% % Success 3,39679.7% 3,18271.9% Nonsuccess 2295.4% 4079.2% Withdraw 63314.9% 83418.9% Total 4,258100.0% 4,423100.0%

10 College Credit Course Success Degree-Seeking Students by Ethnicity and Status Full TimePart Time White-Non- HispanicHispanic White-Non- HispanicHispanic Number% % % % Success 1,15882.0% 1,61773.5% 1,22577.0% 1,02468.1% Nonsuccess 654.6% 22710.3% 1056.6% 1218.1% Withdraw 19013.4% 35516.1% 26016.4% 35823.8% Total 1,413100.0% 2,19999.9% 1,590100.0% 1,503100.0%

11 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental Math (100-109) All StudentsFull TimePart Time Number% % % Success 35662.7% 19764.0% 15961.2% Nonsuccess 8214.4% 5417.5% 2810.8% Withdraw 13022.9% 5718.5% 7328.1% Total 568100.0% 308100.0% 260100.0%

12 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental Math (100- 109) All StudentsMaleFemale Number% % % Success 35662.7% 10455.6%24766.0% Nonsuccess 8214.4% 3217.1%4913.1% Withdraw 13022.9% 5127.3%7820.9% Total 568100.0% 187100.0%374100.0%

13 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental Math (100- 109) All StudentsUnder 25Over 25 Number% % % Success 35662.7% 21558.7% 13969.8% Nonsuccess 8214.4% 6517.8% 178.5% Withdraw 13022.9% 8623.5% 4321.6% Total 568100.0% 366100.0% 199100.0%

14 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental Math (100- 109) All Students White Non- HispanicHispanic Number% % % Success 35662.7% 11071.9%20459.6% Nonsuccess 8214.4% 149.2%5516.1% Withdraw 13022.9% 2919.0%8324.3% Total 568100.0% 153100.0%342100.0%

15 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental English (107-110L) All StudentsFull TimePart Time Number% % % Success 28262.9% 15768.3% 12443.8% Nonsuccess 419.2% 2310.0% 196.7% Withdraw 12527.9% 5021.7% 7526.5% Total 448100.0% 230100.0% 21877.0%

16 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental English (107-110L) All StudentsMaleFemale Number% % % Success 28262.9% 8553.5%19167.5% Nonsuccess 419.2% 2213.8%196.7% Withdraw 12527.9% 5232.7%7325.8% Total 448100.0% 159100.0%283100.0%

17 College Credit Course Success Students in Developmental English (107-110L) All Students White Non- HispanicHispanic Number% % % Success 28262.9% 6765.7%18563.6% Nonsuccess 419.2% 76.9%268.9% Withdraw 12527.9% 2827.5%8027.5% Total 448100.0% 102100.0%291100.0%

18 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway English (111-112) All StudentsFull TimePart Time Number% % % Success 28071.1% 15269.7% 12872.7% Nonsuccess 266.6% 198.7% 74.0% Withdraw 8822.3% 4721.6% 4123.3% Total 394100.0% 218100.0% 176100.0%

19 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway English (111-112) All StudentsMaleFemale Number% % % Success 28071.1% 9366.9%18673.5% Nonsuccess 266.6% 117.9%155.9% Withdraw 8822.3% 3525.2%5220.6% Total 394100.0% 139100.0%253100.0%

20 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway English (111-112) All StudentsUnder 25Over 25 Number% % % Success 28071.1% 16767.1% 11377.9% Nonsuccess 266.6% 218.4% 53.4% Withdraw 8822.3% 6124.5% 2718.6% Total 394100.0% 249100.0% 145100.0%

21 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway English (111-112) All StudentsWhite Non-HispanicHispanic Number% % % Success 28071.1% 10980.1%13564.6% Nonsuccess 266.6% 64.4%178.1% Withdraw 8822.3% 2115.4%5727.3% Total 394100.0% 136100.0%209100.0%

22 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway Math (121) All StudentsFull TimePart Time Number% % % Success 6579.3% 3876.0% 2784.4% Nonsuccess 67.3% 48.0% 26.3% Withdraw 1113.4% 816.0% 39.4% Total 82100.0% 50100.0% 32100.0%

23 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway Math (121) All StudentsMaleFemale Number% % % Success 6579.3% 1168.8%2779.4% Nonsuccess 67.3% 212.5%25.9% Withdraw 1113.4% 318.8%514.7% Total 82100.0% 16100.0%34100.0%

24 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway Math (121) All StudentsUnder 25Over 25 Number% % % Success 6579.3% 2873.7% 1090.9% Nonsuccess 67.3% 37.9% 19.1% Withdraw 1113.4% 718.4% -0.0% Total 82100.0% 38100.0% 11100.0%

25 College Credit Course Success Students in Gateway Math (121) All Students White Non- HispanicHispanic Number% % % Success 6579.3% 2278.6%3378.6% Nonsuccess 67.3% 13.6%37.1% Withdraw 1113.4% 517.9%614.3% Total 82100.0% 28100.0%42100.0%

26 College Credit Course Success Total and On-Line Courses TotalOn-Line Courses Number% % Success 7,74276.0% 60169.5% Nonsuccess 7707.6% 10311.9% Withdraw 1,68016.5% 16118.6% Total 10,192100.0% 865100.0%

Download ppt "Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006."

Similar presentations

Background and Data Student Success Committee. MECC Definition of Student Success Retained Complete 2/3 of credits With 2.0 GPA or higher.

Background and Data Student Success Committee. MECC Definition of Student Success Retained Complete 2/3 of credits With 2.0 GPA or higher.
Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No. 30-07.

Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.

Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Office of Institutional Effectiveness September 18, 2013 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood

Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Office of Institutional Effectiveness September 18, 2013 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood
Retention and Graduation of Degree Partnership Students Preliminary Results Master’s Thesis Barbara Cormack May 19, 2006.

Retention and Graduation of Degree Partnership Students Preliminary Results Master’s Thesis Barbara Cormack May 19, 2006.
INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,

INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.

Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.
Institutional Effectiveness and the National Community College Benchmark Project Dr. Glynis Daniels Dr. Ceil Connelly-Weida Lehigh Carbon Community College.

Institutional Effectiveness and the National Community College Benchmark Project Dr. Glynis Daniels Dr. Ceil Connelly-Weida Lehigh Carbon Community College.
Student Success Pilot Project Overview Student Success Pilot Project ITS Workgroup March 8, 2010.

Student Success Pilot Project Overview Student Success Pilot Project ITS Workgroup March 8, 2010.
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance: An Achieving the Dream Cross-State Data Initiative 2009 SHEEO/NCES Network.

Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance: An Achieving the Dream Cross-State Data Initiative 2009 SHEEO/NCES Network.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team January 11, 2008.

Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team January 11, 2008.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.

The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.

Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.

Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.

1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
ARCC 2009 2007/08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.

ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
ASA 1/26/2006 A CHIEVING THE D REAM SM Student Success February 1, 2006 Integrating the Project into the Core College Operations.

ASA 1/26/2006 A CHIEVING THE D REAM SM Student Success February 1, 2006 Integrating the Project into the Core College Operations.
De Anza Research, May 19, 20031 LinC Research Site visit with Marybeth Mason and Sally Murphy  Feedback on Retention and Success Assessment  Discussion.

De Anza Research, May 19, LinC Research Site visit with Marybeth Mason and Sally Murphy  Feedback on Retention and Success Assessment  Discussion.
Equity Scorecard Update A presentation to the Madison College Board of Trustees February 09, 2011.

Equity Scorecard Update A presentation to the Madison College Board of Trustees February 09, 2011.
Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Fall 2013 Highlights Office of Institutional Effectiveness February 12, 2014 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood.

Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Fall 2013 Highlights Office of Institutional Effectiveness February 12, 2014 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google