Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMiles Long Modified over 9 years ago
1
Non-metastatic Osteosarcoma: Response based augmentatation of therapy P9754 A Children’s Oncology Group Study Schwartz CL, Wexler LH, Devidas M, Teot LA, Goorin A, Grier H, Gebhard M, Steinherz L, Sato J, Healey J, Lipshultz S, Miser J, Womer R, Meyers P, Bernstein M
2
P9754 BACKGROUND Percent necrosis (% NEC) is predictive of EFS Dose Intensity is associated with outcome Acute & long term cardiac toxicity significant Understanding biology will allow prognosis
3
P9754: OBJECTIVES Although chemotherapy has improved outcome for OS, patients continue to experience recurrence and death. P9754 was designed to: 1.Evaluate the safety of augmenting chemotherapy with doxorubicin (600mg/m2 cumulative dose) or ifosfamide (14 g/m2/cycle). 2.Determine if dexrzoxane (DXR) cardioprotection during pre- operative induction chemotherapy affects histologic response. 3.Assess feasiblity of collecting tumor tissue for biologic investigation.
4
P9754: Sequential Pilot Studies to Augment Therapy #1: Doxo intensification to 600mg/m 2 with dexrazoxane #2: Doxo intensification to 600mg/m 2 with dexrazoxane and ifosfamide #3: Ifosfamide/Etoposide intensification
5
Therapy: P9754 Pilot 1 MTX, CDDP, Doxo Pilot 2 MTX, CDDP, Doxo Ifos (9g/m 2 ) Continue 3 drugs For 22 weeks 3 drugs with Doxo to 600 mg/m2 cum. Continue 4 drugs for 22 weeks Induction 10 weeks Pilot 3 MTX, CDDP, Doxo, Ifos Surgery GR SR 4 drugs with VP16/Ifos (14g/m 2 /cycle ) SR 4 drugs with Doxo to 600 mg/m2 cm. Post-op Chemotx GR Doxo Intensification Ifos/Etoposide Intensification CDDP: 120 mg/m2/cycle X4 MTX = 12 g/m2 X 12, Doxo 75 mg/m 2 x 6
6
Results: Sequential Pilots Original projection: 60 patients/pilot, 90 SR 253 enrolled, 242 eligible, 221 evaluate response Surgical delay not evaluable Additional accrual to pilot 1 (DOXO @600 mg/m 2 ) Pilot 1: 112 Pilot 2: 54 Pilot 3: 55 Pilot 1 9/1999 – 6/2000 Pilot 2 11/00 - 5/01 Pilot 1 5/01 – 10/01 Pilot 3 6/00- 1/00
7
Results: Toxicity GradePilot 1 N=123 Pilot 2 N=58 Pilot 3 N=59 LV dysfunction - Acute 1/2221 Creatinine3/4511 Hypophosphatemia2/315 1411 Ototoxicity2/31 54 Typhlitis3/4/5401 SMN (ANLL)02 (one after relapse) 0 At 30 months: mean FS 33.8 vs. 34.6 for 450 vs. 600 doxo treatment arms (based on very limited numbers entered on LE RDE form)
8
Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy: Percent Necrosis PilotNGood Response* 1112 30.4 % 2/3109 35.8 % Total221 33.0 % Historic Control (POG8651): 30% had > 98% Necrosis No adverse effect on % Necrosis with dexrazoxane * Of those evaluable for response
9
Event Free Survival for Good & Standard Response EFS at 4 yrs GR: 79.1 + 6.2% SR: 55.2 + 5.3% Pilot 1: EFS @ 4 yrs GR: 73.8 + 10.9% SR: 51.8 + 8.2% Pilot 2: EFS @ 4 yrs GR: 76.2 + 9.3% SR: 57.1 + 9.1% Pilot 3: EFS @ 4 yrs GR: 88.9 + 8.2% SR: 60.7 + 8.5%
10
EFS by Pilot EFS at 4 yr Pilot 1: 55.0 + 6.5% 2: 65.9 +8.6% 3: 70.0 + 6.5%
11
P9754 Overall Survival by pilot OS at 4 yr Pilot 1: 69.7 + 5.9% 2: 78.9 + 7.0% 3: 76.3 + 6.0%
12
Biologic Specimens POG 9851: Biology Trial Specimens submitted on 213 of 253 enrolled on P9754
13
Conclusions Dose intensification Feasible with high cumulative dose doxorubicin OR etoposide/high dose ifosfamide EFS Difference of SR vs. GR. remains statistically significant EFS/OS is similar to prior studies (eg. INT 0133) No statistically significant difference between pilots at this time. Randomized studies needed to determine benefit of IE augmentation Cardioprotection by Dexrazoxane ~ 2% acute cardiotoxicity WITH DEXRAZOXANE: including patients receiving DOXO up to 600 mg/m2 % NEC not reduced by Dexrazoxane vs. historical controls. Further studies should address the role of DXR in reducing long term anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity Biology Tumor banking was feasible: 84% submission rate
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.