2. Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups (OCEA, OSEA, School Board, and Admin) Sub-committees – Classroom educators and classified from various grade levels Our Staff – Certified, Classified, and administrators ODE coaches ODE Collaboration grant NEA NEA Foundation Grant

3. Evaluation Prior to 2011 Educator creates an Individual Professional Growth Plan (PGP) – completed annually Traditional Evaluation (3X) Scheduled pre-observation meeting and planning Formal observation Post observation conference Summative (three levels – meets, area for improvement, does not meet) Non-Traditional Evaluation (contracted educator) Mutually agreed upon goals that are monitored Scheduled conferences to monitor progress (evidence) Summative (three levels – meets, area for improvement, does not meet)

4. Evaluation Pilot (SY11-12 & 12-13) Evaluation Process – Educators do a self-assessment on the domains (Charolette Danielson) Educators complete an Individual Growth and Evaluation form (SMART format) to set goals (2) SLO were added in 12-13 to a pilot group w/ mid-year check Educator has a Professional Growth and Evaluation conference to go over goals with administrator/supervisor

5. Evaluation Pilot (SY11-12 & 12-13) Continued Educator completes a Professional Growth and Evaluation reflection on the domains and teaching Summative meeting with administrator/supervisor to review progress. 2 nd. Year of pilot (12-13) will determine educator placement on the continuum Beginning in 12-13 we will use a matrix model for our summative (professional practice and student growth)

6. Evaluation Pilot - Observations Kim Marshall Observation style 5 mini-observations (unannounced) per year during the pilot (minimum) 2 formal feedback (verbal and written) 3 informal feedback (verbal, but can be written) Formal observation is available if requested (educator/admin) Observation feedback is included in the summative evaluation. A summative score.

7. Observations Differentiated Beginning 2013- 2014

8. Professional Development Additional Professional Development TeachScape on-line PD of domains 2 and 3 Including training in each bldg. on how to use Implementation of TalentEd to house all evaluation and observation documents SLO workshop for Educators (pilot) Additional use of PLC time by staff to understand the domains of the evaluation system and to improve teaching All administrators have received and continue to receive inter-rater reliability training on the domains

9. Aligned Professional Development Increased discussion and dialogue on student learning outcomes and student engagement Creation of Teacher Educator Leaders and Mentor/Mentee opportunities CLASS 101 for Educators to understand the new evaluation system and mini-observations CLASS 201 for Administrators to understand their role in the new evaluation system and for them to learn about their new evaluation system

10. Professional Development Next Steps Continued PD on the domains Training for all staff on Student Learning Outcomes Analyzing the summative data for additional supports as needed Creating a menu of PD opportunities for staff to use on-line Continued Mentor/mentee opportunities

11. Communication CLASS Design Team wiki https://wiki.orecity.k12.or.us/groups/chalkboardclassprojectwiki/ All documents and information related to what we are doing CLASS Newsletters and monthly updates within district

12. Questions Oregon City Contact Info: Brent Leong CLASS Phoenix Coordinator brent.leong@orecity.k12.or.us Teresa Figgins CLASS Sub-committee member teresa.figgins@orecity.k12.or.us Cindy Williams OCEA President cindy.williams@orecity.k12.or.us