Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for."— Presentation transcript:

1 D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for Sustainability Keele University

2 PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Bland Tomkinson: Manchester University Sophie Bessant: Keele University

3 G ETTING S TARTED Potential Issues with Problem-Based Group Working?

4 G ETTING S TARTED Potential Issues with Problem-Based Group Working Students not taking group work as seriously Group members failing to turn up Lack of preparation Dominating students “Passenger” students Conflicts within the group Tutors carry on teaching Tutors fail to manage group problems Tutors fail to make learning objectives clear Groups having difficulty getting started Disciplinary and Cultural differences Pre-conceptions of the PBL process PBL Training for facilitators and students Coverage: knowledge v skills Expert v non-expert facilitators Some students find group work daunting

5 G ETTING THEM INTO GROUPS Size of groups: Is there an “Ideal” group size? Is group size different for online? Does the group size depend on the number of facilitators? Choosing group membership: Does the tutor or do students lead the choice of groups? Do you constrain the groups to balance cultures/disciplines? Do you look for a balance of males and females in the group? Is it simpler just to use a random or systematic approach? Do you expect to change the groups or stay with same ones all the way through?

6 S UPPORTING THE PROCESS Do you provide exercises to help the group dynamics? eg: Ground rules Team roles Resolving conflict/negotiation Decision making Problem solving Do you put all this (and other things) in a Handbook?

7 C OPING WITH DIVERSITY What are the differences within the group? Diverse cultures Diverse disciplines Differences in learning style Differences in language skill Differences in expectations of groupwork What are the differences in approach with PBL? Differences in approach to learning Differences in assessment Dealing with expectations of ‘being taught’

8 A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

9 A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

10 A SSESSMENT How do you assess students now? What is different with PBL? What is different online? The need for Constructive Alignment What are the intended learning outcomes? The need for Authentic Assessment How do we make the assessment reflect the ‘real’ world? How do we balance individual and group marks?

11 A SSESSMENT Group Individual Assessment Oral presentation Video clip Reflective report/log/portfolio Student newspaper article Peer assessment Workbook Intervention action plan Formal/technical report Information leaflet Poster

12 A SSESSMENT Modified Essay Questions Facilitator observation Groupwork Reflective essays/logs Peer assessment

13 P EER ASSESSMENT What to assess? How to assess it?

14 P EER ASSESSMENT What to assess? Authentic assessment Constructive alignment How does the assessment relate to the learning outcomes? How to assess it? Does a different mode of learning need a different mode of assessment?

15 P EER ASSESSMENT Attended regularly and on time Contributed actively to the group discussions Gathered appropriate ideas and information Helped to shape ideas and analyse information to develop an appropriate solution Helped the group to reach decisions by summarising ideas and information Contributed to the structure and design of the report Contributed to the writing of the report Helped to keep the group focussed on the task Made sure the views of everyone were included Helped to identify and resolve potential conflicts in the group.

16 P EER ASSESSMENT - LEARNING OUTCOMES Transferable skills and personal qualities D1 Apply reflective practice to enable continuing self- improvement in a professional context. D2 Work collaboratively as a member of a multidisciplinary team, contributing to the development of effective team processes and effective team dynamics. D3 Develop strategies to work more effectively with those from different disciplinary, national or cultural backgrounds. D4 Demonstrate the ability to practise self-directed learning including: defining a problem, formulating questions to be explored, identifying relevant sources of information, critically appraising information, applying new knowledge and understanding, referencing accurately, justifying approaches and decisions, reflecting on their application and analysing what has been learned through the experience. D5 Develop, debate, structure and communicate ideas and proposals in writing, verbally in meetings and in presentation format.

17 R EFLECTIVE PRACTICE All 3 universities require some form of reflective diary or reflective report. How often is this to be assessed? Weekly/twice a semester/end of semester? How much ‘scaffolding’ do we give? None/weekly prompts/detailed questions? What do we assess? Group skills/subject knowledge/capacity to cope with change/capacity to continue to learn?

18 R EFLECTIVE PRACTICE What do we assess? Group skills/subject knowledge/capacity to cope with change/capacity to continue to learn? In Manchester, The five reflective report assessment criteria are: Completeness and presentation of report and quality of reflective practice Demonstrating comprehension of underlying learning points Demonstrating development of self-directed learning skills (analysing problems, researching literature, evaluating sources, critical appraisal of information, accurate referencing) Awareness of and contribution to development of the team dynamics Awareness and development of effective team processes

19 PBL: G ETTING TO G RIPS Thank You Are there any questions?


Download ppt "D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google