Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

William Edson SUNY at Albany.  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: 0.664442±0.0418289  Chi2: 29.953  Meas. Used: 31  σ : 170.884±10.7578  New.

Published byAbraham Kelley Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "William Edson SUNY at Albany.  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: 0.664442±0.0418289  Chi2: 29.953  Meas. Used: 31  σ : 170.884±10.7578  New."— Presentation transcript:

1 William Edson SUNY at Albany

2  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: 0.664442±0.0418289  Chi2: 29.953  Meas. Used: 31  σ : 170.884±10.7578  New Corrected Results:  Signal Fraction: 0.685204± 0.0418289  σ : 176.223 ± 10.7578  Correction Systematic: ±3.87838

3 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- JER 0.6656390.686278642177.08052140.8571270640.48638665 JRE 0.6652570.685935659176.99952420.7761298380.440423839 JES up 0.6357690.659459578157.13638619.0870084-10.83114332 JES down 0.6963540.713856396200.4752163-24.25182213.76197641 JVF up 0.6632830.684163285175.06086761.162526811-0.659689263 JVF down 0.665220.685902439177.2338911-1.010496740.573418043 BSF up 0.6607320.681872845171.67054124.552853193-2.583569117 BSF down 0.6680050.688402977181.0230963-4.799701942.723646289 MET up 0.6553910.677077378171.34731954.876074841-2.766984973 MET down 0.6805860.699698948182.4723177-6.248923313.546023692 Tau trig up 0.6876230.706017185180.283724-4.060329622.304080928 Tau trig down 0.633630.657539057170.97907845.244315964-2.97594765 TES up 0.6727660.692677686179.40659313.1831987171.806342869 TES down 0.6604880.681653767181.44032675.2169323522.960408504 Tau Eveto SF up 0.6647390.685470568176.2631482-0.039753860.022558786 Tau Eveto SF down 0.664140.68493275176.18226740.041127005-0.023337994

4 Nominaltes_uptes_down No cut 14980835 GRL 11582501 Trigger 2148161 ntrack > 4 2146272 Electron/muon overlap 2146215 Event cleaning 212946121295672129462 Lepton veto 936511936557936511 ntaus > 0 263227380669258603 njets ≥ 4 156093.09241761.07909153199.70067 MET > 60 GeV 121403.40186241.12378119256.12293 MT < 80 GeV 64807.29106553.5228464096.69956 nbjets > 1 54693.3689938.7025154106.97931 Trigger match 21465.81021510.53060820785.628509 Truth match 18115.24718085.58114217573.842642 Cutflows

5 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- Wnorm Up 0.6499420.672184941165.553030710.670363626.055021045 Wnorm Down 0.6779270.697311539186.9328833-10.7094889-6.077223147 QCD Bin/Range 0.6984550.715742799184.07750587.854111394.4569062 HiISR 0.6632610.684143532130.6296872 LowISR 0.6653790.686045198111.22879089.7004482195.504631354

6 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- 167.5 0.6887650.707042541183.20081246.9774180553.959416444 170.0 0.6948730.712526666170.8047351-5.41865928-3.074880778 175.0 0.6884750.706782161152.8903987-23.3329957-13.24057783 177.5 0.6642390.685021638141.9999232-34.2234711-19.42050387 167.5 0.6814230.700450456182.36627056.1428760883.485845969 170.0 0.6914780.709478433170.5162042-5.70719014-3.238610945 175.0 0.6921640.710094365153.283518-22.9398764-13.01749774 177.5 0.6712840.691347059142.6328525-33.5905419-19.06134086 167.5 0.6745670.703001275182.68732346.4639289913.668031146 170.0 0.6948730.711924203170.747795-5.47559937-3.107192089 175.0 0.6884750.71296123153.625443-22.5979514-12.82346847 177.5 0.6642390.694294731142.9328366-33.2905577-18.8911114 Original kfac/ σ (FE) from TopMC11 twiki Correction using Ref σ ’s Using kfac/ σ (FE) from 105200

7 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- AlpHerwig (baseline)0.6939620.71170871694.5778786767.1672763138.11484653 MC@NLO (105200)0.6884170.706730085173.173738811.428583846.485281865 SYST_AtF_1058600.7190170.734204586153.02228723.355499411.904116886 SYST_AtF_1170500.6652790.685955412149.6667878- - SYST_Full_1170500.6954740.71306628161.745155 -- 1.1) fullsim mc11c POWHEG+fPythia sample 117050 (SYST_Full_117050) and MC@NLO+fHerwig sample 105200 (MC@NLO(105200)) 1.2) fullsim mc11c POWHEG+fPythia sample 117050 (SYST_Full_117050) and the fullsim mc11c ALPGEN+HERWIG samples (AlpHerwig(baseline)) 1.3) AtlFast2 mc11b POWHEG+fPythia sample 117050 (SYST_AtF_117050) POWHEG+fHerwig sample 105860 (SYST_AtF_105860)

8 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- > 0.58 0.6744450.694185193178.533237 < 0.58 0.6598890.68111595175.17203843.3611991.907351

9

10 MET Dijet Mass

11 MET Dijet Mass

12

13 for (unsigned int tfj = (tau_matched.size() - 1); tfj > 0; tfj--) { try { int REFN1 = tau_matched.at(tfj).entry(); int REFN2 = tau_matched.at(tfj-1).entry(); if( (physics->tau_BDTJetScore->at(REFN1)) > (physics- >tau_BDTJetScore->at(REFN2))) { save = tau_matched.at(tfj); tau_matched.at(tfj) = tau_matched.at(tfj-1); tau_matched.at(tfj-1) = save; } catch (const std::out_of_range& C12_2){ std::cerr << endl << "C12.2: OUT OF RANGE ERROR: " << C12_2.what() << endl; EMERXIT = 12; continue; }

14 SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute) Unc (%) Nominal 0.6644420.685203904176.2233944 -- Range+1 0.677020.696497181179.127843-2.90444868-1.648162943 Range+2 0.6662510.686828132176.6411196-0.41772521-0.237042993 Range+3 0.666330.686899063176.6593619-0.43596749-0.247394787 Range-1 0.6823550.701287261180.3597745-4.13638013-2.347236667 Range-2 0.6669770.687479978176.8087639-0.58536949-0.332174675 Range-3 0.6770230.696499874179.1285358-2.90514143-1.648556049 Bins+1 0.6984550.715742799184.0775058-7.85411139-4.4569062 Bins+2 0.6485990.670979116172.56500833.6583861092.075993441 Bins-1 0.6463160.668929303172.03782934.185565022.375147202 Bins-2 0.6687090.68903507177.2087086-0.98531424-0.559127944 Range increases/decreases in steps of 20GeV Bin amount increases/decreases in steps of 5

15  Y(0): -0.186462 ± 0.0013857  Slope: 1.23971 ± 0.00246245  Chi2: 32.7364NDF: 8998

16 Slope: 1.23772 ± 0.0351884y-intercept: -0.184483 ± 0.0198016 Chi2: 0.00520053NDF: 7

17 Input Fraction Previous Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc.Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc. 0.1-0.08994620.00362867-0.09982910.00487524 0.20.05385210.002070060.05014270.00241776 0.30.1743260.001837660.2041450.00187353 0.40.2980440.001584340.3352510.00170598 0.50.4192000.001436060.4606220.00147548 0.60.5362260.001350770.5806400.00134429 0.70.6512460.001244410.6894190.00114811 0.80.7627690.001240640.7943410.00116489 0.90.8753380.001378050.8946160.00111430 0.6260890.5660950.00132265 0.6644420.6510990.00120115

18 RangeFit to MeansFit to All ValuesCorrected σ Y(0)SlopeY(0)Slope 0.1 – 0.9 -0.1844831.23770-0.18646921.23971176.524 0.2 – 0.9 -0.1565491.19581-0.1558151.19374176.719 0.3 – 0.9 -0.1240791.14942-0.123311.1473176.586 0.4 – 0.9 -0.09972651.11622-0.09871071.11376176.223

19 MC Tau Count MC Tau Children pdgIDMC Tau Children Count Leptonic pdgID values: e → 11, μ → 13, τ → 15

20 Samples Normalized to Own Integrals Samples Normalized to Sum of Integrals

21

22  C0: GRL  C1: Trigger  C2: Primary vertex with ntracks > 4  C3: Electron/muon overlap  C4: Jet cleaning  C5: Lepton Veto  C6: tau n ≥ 1  C7: n jets >= 4 with eta 0.75  C8: MET > 60GeV  C9: M T < 80GeV  C10: >= 1 b jet  C11: Trigger matched tau n ≥ 1 and p T >= 40GeV  C12: MC tau object match

23  Equation:  N(x): total number of events of type x for distribution  n(x) i : number of events in bin of type x  frac(Sig): fraction of N(Remain) expected to be Signal  binfrac(x) i : fraction of events in bin of type x expected from MC or template  σ i : uncertainty in bin i

24  σ i determined using factors for:  bin error:  data  signal, MC  QCD template  other backgrounds, MC  statistical error:  data: signal region  other backgrounds, MC  signal, MC  QCD template (uncertainty of background region data and all MC background region carried through via default SumW2

25  Results for plot:  chi-square: 9.818  p-value: 0.7753  ndf: 14  chi/ndf: 0.7012

26  Results for plot:  chi-square: 13.66  p-value: 0.5517  ndf: 15  chi/ndf: 0.9107

27  Results for plot:  chi-square: 15.47  p-value: 0.6297  ndf: 18  chi/ndf: 0.8594

28  Results for plot:  chi-square: 15.87  p-value: 0.1971  ndf: 12  chi/ndf: 1.323

29  Results for plot:  chi-square: 14.39  p-value: 0.2123  ndf: 11  chi/ndf: 1.308

30 CutSig EvtsFakesSig Eff.Fake Ratio Rej Fact. Sig/ sqrt(Bkgd) Sig/ Sqrt(Sig+ Bkgd) C5 Lep Veto 58631451086---4.8674.857 C6 ntaus > 0 586313827610.095290.0424015.7715.44 C7 njets 3191110250.54430.079730.531830.3926.76 C8 MET 258375980.80950.68920.4199829.6325.60 C9 MT 189239680.73250.52220.651030.0424.72 C10 bjet 165012300.87210.309981.53847.0530.75 C12 Trig match 9413350.57030.27244.92551.4126.34

Download ppt "William Edson SUNY at Albany.  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: 0.664442±0.0418289  Chi2: 29.953  Meas. Used: 31  σ : 170.884±10.7578  New."

Similar presentations

William Edson SUNY at Albany Anirvan Sircar Louisiana Tech University.

William Edson SUNY at Albany Anirvan Sircar Louisiana Tech University.
1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > 114.4 GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.

Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows.

WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows.
Jet Veto Scale Factor for ZZ Analysis Haijun Yang, Lailin Xu, Bing Zhou ATLAS SM ZZ  Meeting February 2, 2012.

Jet Veto Scale Factor for ZZ Analysis Haijun Yang, Lailin Xu, Bing Zhou ATLAS SM ZZ  Meeting February 2, 2012.
1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.

1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.

The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, 2005. Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University

Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.

Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.

Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.

Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.

4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.
Yu Bai (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the SUSY Weak Production team ACCM 23, Mar 3, 2013 Search of SUSY Weak Production with hadronic taus Search of SUSY.

Yu Bai (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the SUSY Weak Production team ACCM 23, Mar 3, 2013 Search of SUSY Weak Production with hadronic taus Search of SUSY.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,

Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
The Physics of Generations (Update) 11-Dec-03 Don Lincoln f.

The Physics of Generations (Update) 11-Dec-03 Don Lincoln f.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
William P. Edson, Teeba Rashid, Dr. Sajjad Alam 1 Dr. Dick Greenwood, Anirvan Sircar 2 Dr. Patrick Skubic, Dr. Muhammad Saleem, Dr. Brad Abbot, Dr. Phil.

William P. Edson, Teeba Rashid, Dr. Sajjad Alam 1 Dr. Dick Greenwood, Anirvan Sircar 2 Dr. Patrick Skubic, Dr. Muhammad Saleem, Dr. Brad Abbot, Dr. Phil.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google