Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRoger Mitchell Modified over 9 years ago
2
Experiment design Research Methods Fall 2010 Tamás Bőhm
3
Elements of experiment design Question Method Stimulus Control Interpretation
4
Question Functional specialization of the cortex Development of functions (ontogenesis & phylogenesis) Operation of specific functions
5
Question Functional specialization of the cortex
6
Question Development of functions
7
Question Operation of specific functions What determines the brightness of a surface?
8
Method Behavioral/psychophysics Electrophysiology Imaging Genetics …
9
Stimulus Ishihara plates: tests wavelength sensitivity (the tuning of retinal red and green cones)
10
Stimulus Brightness of the spots need to be controlled 1.Constant brightness (isoluminance): hard to achieve 2.Randomizing light intensity
11
Stimulus
12
Stereopsis (binocular depth perception): based on retinal disparity Can break camouflage Stimulus
13
Julesz Béla’s random dot stereograms (RDS)
14
Stimulus
15
http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/%7Eikovacs/SandP/rds/rds.html
16
Stimulus At which level of visual processing does stereopsis happen? –1950s: at very high level (after figure-ground separation and form recognition) Monocular form cues & contours are essential Could not find neural substrates –Julesz: it must be early in processing! No monocular cues on RDSs Could find the corresponding binocular depth cells Question: functional specialization Method: psychophysics, electrophysiology
17
Stimulus Hubel and Wiesel 1962 Barlow, Blakemore and Pettigrew 1967 Bishop 1969 Gian Poggio 1984: disparity selective neurons in V1, V2, V3, V3a response of a binocular depth cell
18
Stimulus Take home message: use ‘clean’ stimuli
19
Stimuli Huggins pitch: heard only binaurally http://www.parmly.luc.edu/parmly/
20
Stimuli Interaural time difference (ITD) is measured by a neural crosscorrelator Jeffress 1948; Licklider 1951
21
Stimuli Interaural time difference (ITD) calculated for each cochlear frequency channel: cue for both source segregation & pitch detection Jeffress 1948; Licklider 1951
22
Stimulus Binocular rivalry
23
Stimulus At which level of visual processing does this happen? –1980s: at low level Competition between the two eyes Reciprocal inhibition of monocular neurons Question: functional specialization Method: psychophysics
24
Stimuli Conventional rivalry inducing pair: eye-of-origin and stimulus coherence
25
Stimuli Patchwork rivalry stimulus (Kovács et al PNAS 1996): stimulus coherence only
26
Stimuli
27
Stimulus At which level of visual processing does this happen? –1980s: at low level Competition between the two eyes Reciprocal inhibition of monocular neurons –Kovács et al.: later in processing Competition also between two coherent pictures After the input layer of V1 Question: functional specialization Method: psychophysics
28
Stimulus Logothetis
29
Stimulus Take home message: get rid of extraneous factors in the stimuli
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.