Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented to The 2004 American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting Washington, D.C. November 14–18, 2004 Uranium-Based Catalyst M. J. Haire Nuclear Science.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Presented to The 2004 American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting Washington, D.C. November 14–18, 2004 Uranium-Based Catalyst M. J. Haire Nuclear Science."— Presentation transcript:

1 Presented to The 2004 American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting Washington, D.C. November 14–18, 2004 Uranium-Based Catalyst M. J. Haire Nuclear Science and Technology Division S. H. Overbury, C. K. Riahi-Nezhad, and S. Dai Chemical Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory

2 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 2 Depleted Uranium (DU) as Catalysts  DU has proven active for many catalytic reactions  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and chlorinated VOC oxidation  Selective oxidation and ammoxidation (patented mixed U-Sb oxide)  Partial oxidation—methane to methanol (patented mixed U-Mo oxide)  Oxidative coupling (C chain lengthening)  Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO  Many other catalytic applications are possible (but unproven)  These reactions are important for many environmental applications and chemical production

3 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 3 New Synthetic Approaches  New techniques to improve catalyst performance and handling  nanoporous supports by templating techniques  co-assembly of U into nanoporous supports  complexing U onto Si cubes  Techniques lead to high surface areas  higher catalytic activity  more efficient use of uranium  dilutes specific radioactivity (dpm per gm material)  Convenient solid form  sol-gel approach leads to monoliths  easier handling before and after application  reduced risk of loss of powder blow-out  stabilize catalyst

4 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 4 Synthesis of Nanoporous Materials  Micelles of variable sizes used as template molecules  TEOS produces Si gel around template molecules. Dope with uranium nitrate  alignment (crystallization) of micelles leads to ordered arrays  surfactant “burned out” or removed by solvent extraction  approach can be used to make mesoporous SiO 2 or TiO 2, or other oxides Surfactant extraction or calcination Silica condensation Rodlike micelle Silicate encapsulated micelles TEOS(C 16 H 33 )N(CH 3 ) 3 Br + NaOH / H 2 O

5 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 5 Nonpowder Forms of DU Catalysts  High Surface Area  250 m 2 /g  monolithic catalysts simplifies handling  uranium oxide is not co- precipitated; it is on/in the pore walls  transparency, possible photochemical processes  Reactive Membranes Optical Absorption Spectrum Monolithic U-SiO 2

6 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 6 Reactor Set-up for Catalytic Testing 7721 vent GC/MS Reactor (Temp. Controlled) w/ quartz tube & sample To Mass Spec/ G.C bypass bubbler bypass RR 21.0 Thermocouple Bubbler and Ice Bath Heating Zone 42 He O 2 He He gas for bubbler Flow Regulator From O2 Tank From He Tank 21 ml/min (He) H 2 O Syringe Flow Meter He O2O2 ( 77 ml/min He + 42 ml/min O 2 ) Mixing Point 140 ml/min Pressure Gauge Adjusting Valve Bypass Flow Line to Bypass the BubblerLine to Bypass the Reactor

7 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 7 Photograph of Reactor Used in DU Project

8 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 8 Light-Off Curves to Compare Activity: U 3 O 8 measure light-off curve to compare activity for toluene oxidation  Reactor conditions  25 mg catalyst  He flow 150 cm 3 /min  O 2 flow 40 cm 3 /min  toluene 500 ppm  GHSV = 72000 hr -1  Mesoporous silica (MCM-41) without DU is inactive  U 3 O 8 obtained by calcination of UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2  Pure U 3 O 8 is active but low surface area (<0.1 m 2 /g )

9 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 9 U impregnated in Mesoporous Support  U-MAS-5  UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 impregnated into solid mesoporous silica  silica contains 5% Al  U:Si = 1:10  improved light-off compared to pure U 3 O 8

10 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 10 Catalysts Synthesized by Co-Synthesis Techniques  U-SiP123 catalysts  Uranium nitrate put into synthesis mixture  Pluronic P123 (EO-PO-EO triblock co-polymer)  Acid conditions  Vary U:Si ratio  50% conversion above 450  C  Activity higher than U 3 O 8 although lower U concentration  Gave poorly ordered mesopores  Broad BJH pore distribution  BET SA 225–300 m 2 /g

11 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 11 TEM Characterization of DU Catalysts  Catalyst particle of U- MAS-5  Al 3+ doped silica mesoporous support impregnated with uranyl nitrate  Calcined 900ºC  High resolution TEM using HD-2000 at ORNL  Uranium oxide particles located within pores

12 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 12 STEM Micrograph of DU Catalyst  Catalyst U-SiF127  UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 mixed in with TEOS  Pluronic F127 (EO-PO-EO triblock co-polymer)  Acid conditions  U part of the Si walls  U:Si = 1:20  Mesoporous structure shows as parallel walls  Pore spacing 10.3 nm  Uranium oxide particles are uniformly sized  <10–15 nm

13 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 13 X-ray Diffraction of DU Catalysts  XRD permits identification of phases present in catalyst before or after reaction  U-meso-8  U:Si = 1:10  Poor activity  UO 2 and U 3 O 8 present  U-meso-6  U:Si = 1:20  Good activity  Only U 3 O 8 present  XRD shows that U 3 O 8 is the most active phase  Cause of UO 2 growth in U-meso-8 not clear

14 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 14 Promotion of Uranium Catalysts: Effects of Potassium Addition Potassium is frequently used as promoter in many catalysts Idea: Promote Cl-C bond cleavage by K addition  Method 1: co-assembly including K salts  Br, Nitrate or oxalate salts  U:Si=1:20  U:K = 1:1  Surface area and pore structure collapses  Surface area drops from 190 m 2 /g to 1-5 m 2 /g loss of activity  Method 2: sequential impregnation of MCM-41 with uranyl nitrate and K salts  Surface area drops from 760 to 26 m 2 /g loss of activity

15 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 15 Promotion of Uranium Catalysts: Effects of K, Ca Fe Oxide Additions  Try other components for urania catalysts  Co-assembly with FeNO 3 and Mg acetate (Ca nitrate)  Surface area remains high  Pore structure good  But, no enhancement of activity

16 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 16 Effect of Uranium Loading in TiO 2 Based Mesoporous Catalysts  Get optimal activity at 5 mole% U (U:Ti=1:20)  Surface area (and activity) affected by calcination temperatures Toluene oxidation

17 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 17 Activity for Oxidation of Other VOCs  Chlorinated VOCs are common pollutants at industrial and DOE sites  Uranium loaded TiO 2 catalysts were active for destruction of chlorinated VOCs such as chlorobenzene and trichloroethylene (TCE)  TCE and Cl-benzene are more difficult to destroy  By-products are CO 2 and water mostly – but small amounts of benzaldehyde from Cl-benzene  Cl products are both HCl and Cl 2 results of VOC combustion in absence of added water

18 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 18 Comparison with Commercial Pt Catalysts Uranium oxide in mesoporous support outperforms a Pt catalyst (0.1 wt % Pt on alumina) for comparable reaction conditions  T 50 for TCE is more than 50°C lower for U-mTiO 2 catalyst than for Pt catalyst

19 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 19 Effect of Water Addition In most applications water is present (e.g. soil vapor extraction wells for groundwater clean-up)  Water does not interfere— even enhances activity for TCE oxidation  Water permits higher HCl:Cl 2 ratios of byproducts (good for most applications)  HCl by-product can be trapped

20 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 20 Conclusions  Many DU based catalysts have been prepared and tested  A catalyst formulation based upon a titania-uranium (Ti-U) oxide (Ti:U = 1:20) was found to be competitive with noble metal catalysts for the oxidation of VOCs and chlorinated VOCs, e.g., toluene, Cl-benzene, TCE  The catalyst is stable to deactivation by Cl  The catalyst operates effectively in the presence of large amounts of water  Catalyst is suitable for destruction of VOCs emitted from soil vapor extraction wells, etc.


Download ppt "Presented to The 2004 American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting Washington, D.C. November 14–18, 2004 Uranium-Based Catalyst M. J. Haire Nuclear Science."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google