Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Principles of Microeconomics
Chapter 1 The Scope and Method of Economics
2
1.3 The Scope of Economics Microeconomics:
the study of how households and firms make choices, how they interact in markets, and how the government attempts to influence their choice. Macroeconomics: the study of the economy as a whole, including topics such as inflation, unemployment, and economic growth.
3
1.4 The Method of Economics
1)Positive economics: is concerned with what is. It attempts to understand behavior and the operation of systems without making judgments. It describes what exists and how it works. 2)Normative economics: is concerned with what ought to be. It evaluates outcomes of economic behavior as good or bad. It involves judgments and prescriptions.
4
1.4 The Method of Economics
Some Examples If two office-supply firms emerge, will the price of office supplies increase? --Positive economics Should a nation reduce the size of its government? --Normative economics What would happen if we abolished the corporate income tax? Should we abolish the corporate income tax?
5
1.4 The Method of Economics
3)Descriptive economics: a version of positive economics that uses data & statistics to support all claims e.g. ATUS --Positive economics ATUS – American Time Use Survey
6
1.4The Method of Economics
4)Ceteris Paribus ( all else equal) : all other things being equal. It is used to try and single out the effect attributed to a change in a single variable Example1- what would my grade have been if I studied one more hour, ceteris paribus? i.e. If I slept the same amount, ate the same cereal, parked in the same spot…
7
1.4 The Method of Economics
Example 2: The relationship between the price of apples and the quantity of apples purchased The quantity of apples purchases depends on many other variables, including the consumer’s income So, assumer that the consumer’s income and anything else that influences apple purchases doesn’t change – Ceteris Paribus
8
1.5 Common Fallacies The Post Hoc Fallacy: a common error made in thinking about causation: if event A happens before event B, it is not necessarily true that A caused B. The form: 1. A occurs before B 2. Therefore A is the cause of B
9
1.4 Common Fallacies The Post Hoc Fallacy
EX 1: John is scratched by a cat while visiting her friend. Two days later she comes down with a fever. John concludes that the cat's scratch must be the cause of her illness. EX 2: Peter purchases a new Mac and it works fine for months. He then buys and installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes. Peter concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze.
10
1.4 Common Fallacies The fallacy of Composition: to conclude that what is true for a part is necessarily true for the whole. Example: A tiger eats more food than a human being. Therefore, tigers, as a group, eat more food than do all the humans on the earth
11
1.5 Economic Policy Efficiency will be a major theme for the course that will be developed in many contexts such as Consumer/producer problems Perfect competition Market and government intervention For now, consider efficiency as something that provides the greatest benefit (utility, profit, welfare) while incurring the smallest cost (harm, expenditure, loss)
12
1.5 Economic Policy Equity means fairness. It has implications with normative economics. Impossible to define universally An allocation that seems fair to one person will be viewed by another as highly skewed And may lead to inefficiency
13
1.5 Economic Policy EX: a new grading system Students with A’s, B+’s, and B’s at the end of the course will have points taken away from them and redistributed to those with C’s, D’S, and F’S. In the end, everyone receives a C+ Q: Do you agree with this? => Income redistribution
14
A song: “ you can’t always get what you want”
Sung by The Rolling Stones in 1969 Written by Mick Jagger
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.