Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPercival Fox Modified over 9 years ago
1
Reducing the Amount of Waste Activated Sludge Sara Schmidt CE 479 December 6, 2006
2
Overview of Presentation: Background information Concerns regarding waste activated sludge What is MicroSludge®? Design comparisons of two digester systems
3
Background Information Primary sludge – produced from the primary settling of untreated wastewater Waste activated sludge (WAS) – excess sludge produced from activated sludge process CMAD – Conventional Mesophilic Anaerobic Digester Mesophilic – operating temperature of 25 - 40°C
4
Background Information Thermophilic – operating temperature of 50-60°C MicroSludge – Sludge pre-treatment that greatly enhances the performance of digesters
5
Concerns Regarding WAS: Risks to public health from sludge residuals High capital and operating costs Contribute to the public’s growing concerns regarding odors Negative environmental impacts
6
How much waste do people really produce? A typical secondary wastewater treatment plant that serves 1 million people generates 25 football fields (about three feet deep) of biosolids each year.
7
What is MicroSludge®? MicroSludge works by destroying microbial cell membranes and enabling anaerobic digesters to achieve significantly greater conversion of WAS to biogas. www.microsludge.com
8
MicroSludge and Microbes The image to the left shows intact microbes (magnified 20,000 times) The image to the right shows the same microbes after the MicroSludge process
9
Benefits of MicroSludge Major reduction in WAS residual biosolids (VSr) Lowers retention time => additional digester capacity Increased amount of biogas production Reduces operating, disposal, & mixing costs
10
MicroSludge Location in a Wastewater Treatment Plant
11
Design Parameters (Design 1) Q = 2Mgal/d = 7440 m 3 /d Dry volatile solids = 0.16 kg/m 3 Biodegradable COD removed = 0.17 kg/m 3 HRT (hydraulic retention time) = 15 days Efficiency of waste utilization, E = overall VSr = Mass fraction PS x VSr PS + Mass fraction TWAS x VSr TWAS = (0.65 x 0.68) + (0.35 x 0.45) = 0.60 = E
12
Design Parameters Y = 0.08kg VSS/kg bCOD utilized K d = 0.03d -1 Digester gas is 65% methane Sludge contains 94% moisture, 6% solids = 0.06 = P s Sludge has a specific gravity, S sl = 1.02
13
Calculations Sludge volume = [M s ] ÷ [(S sl) (ρ w )(P s )] = [(0.16 kg/m 3 )(7440 m 3 /d)] ÷ [1.02(10 3 kg/m 3 )(0.06)] = 19.45 m 3 /d
14
Calculations bCOD loading = (0.17 kg/m 3 )(7440 m 3 /d) = 1265 kg/d HRT = V/Q => V = Q * HRT = (19.45 m 3 /d)(15 d) V 1 = 292 m 3
15
Calculations bCOD in inffluent, S o S o = 1265 kg/d bCOD in effluent, S S = 1265(1 - E) = 1265(1 – 0.60) = 506 kg/d
16
Calculations Quantity of volatile solids produced per day, P x P x = [Y(S o – S)] ÷ [1 + (k d )(HRT)] = [0.08kg VSS/kg bCOD(759)] ÷ [1 + (0.03d -1 )(15 d)] P x(1) = 41.88 kg/d
17
Calculations Volume of methane produced per day @ 35°C, V CH 4 V CH 4 = (0.40)[(S o – S) – 1.42P x ] = (0.40m 3 /kg)[759 kg/d – 1.42*(41.88 kg/d)] V CH 4 = 280 m 3 /d Estimate total gas production = 280/0.65 = 430 m 3 /d
18
Design Parameters (Design 2) Q = 2Mgal/d = 7440 m 3 /d Dry volatile solids = 0.16 kg/m 3 Biodegradable COD removed = 0.17 kg/m 3 HRT (hydraulic retention time) = 15 days Efficiency of waste utilization, E = overall VSr = Mass fraction PS x VSr PS + Mass fraction TWAS x VSr TWAS = (0.65 x 0.68) + (0.35 x 0.97) = 0.78 = E
19
Design Parameters Y = 0.08kg VSS/kg bCOD utilized K d = 0.03d -1 Digester gas is 65% methane Sludge contains 94% moisture, 6% solids = 0.06 = P s Sludge has a specific gravity, S sl = 1.02
20
Calculations Sludge volume = [M s ] ÷ [(S sl) (ρ w )(P s )] = [(0.16 kg/m 3 )(7440 m 3 /d)] ÷ [1.02(10 3 kg/m 3 )(0.06)] = 19.45 m 3 /d
21
Calculations bCOD loading = (0.17 kg/m 3 )(7440 m 3 /d) = 1265 kg/d HRT = V/Q => V = Q * HRT = (19.45 m 3 /d)(13 d) V 2 = 253 m 3
22
Calculations bCOD in inffluent, S o S o = 1265 kg/d bCOD in effluent, S S = 1265(1 - E) = 1265(1 – 0.78) = 278 kg/d
23
Calculations Quantity of volatile solids produced per day, P x P x = [Y(S o – S)] ÷ [1 + (k d )(HRT)] = [0.08kg VSS/kg bCOD(987)] ÷ [1 + (0.03d -1 )(13 d)] P x(2) = 56.79 kg/d
24
Calculations Volume of methane produced per day @ 35°C, V CH 4 V CH 4 = (0.40)[(S o – S) – 1.42P x ] = (0.40m 3 /kg)[987 kg/d – 1.42*(56.79 kg/d)] V CH 4 = 362 m 3 /d Estimate total gas production = 362/0.65 = 557 m 3 /d
25
Comparison of two designs Without using MicroSludge (Design 1): – V (1) = 292 m 3 – P x(1) = 41.88 kg/d – V CH 4 = 280 m 3 /d With using MicroSludge (Design 2): – V (2) = 253 m 3 – P x(2) = 56.79 kg/d – V CH 4 = 362 m 3 /d
26
Cost Comparison The major difference between these two designs are the volume needed for the digesters, volatile solids production, and methane gas production. These differences are a major cost reductions for a wastewater treatment plant.
27
Questions???
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.