1. INSTITUTIONAL AND DISCURSIVE OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES MARCO GIUGNI (Universidad de Ginebra) Con la colaboración y financiación de:

2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

3. POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE Individual rights Cultural group rights General political opportunity structure Specific political opportunity structure

4. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS Access to short-term permits Access to long-term permits Access to family reunion Access to nationality Labor market access Welfare state access Anti-discrimination rights Political rights

5. CULTURAL GROUP RIGHTS Cultural requirements to access the community Language programs Schooling Religion Media Labor market: group rights

6. GENERAL POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE Configuration of powers Participatory mechanisms

7. SPECIFIC POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE Degree of development of immigrants’ integration policy at the local level Political representation of immigrants Attitude of local powers towards minority/immigrants organizations Attitude of local powers towards organizations whose activity is specialized in/has an impact on immigration/integration issues Political audience of anti-immigrant and radical right parties

9. Some examples of the use of our indicators to ‘map’ the openness of POS in each city for different dimensions. Capacity to plot cities, but also distinguish between different migrant/ethnic groups within each city, whenever relevant. +1= most open, 0=neutral, -1=most closed

10. ACCESS TO SHORT-TERM PERMITS

11. ACCESS TO LONG-TERM PERMITS

12. FAMILY REUNION

13. ACCESS TO NATIONALITY

14. WELFARE STATE ACCESS (ALL MIGRANT STATUSES)

15. POLITICAL RIGHTS

16. CULTURAL REQUIREMENTS

17. RELIGION: ISLAM

18. CONFIGURATION OF POWER

19. PARTICIPATION MECHANISMS

20. IMMIGRANTS’ INTEGRATION POLICIES

21. POLITICAL REPRESENTATION OF IMMIGRANTS

22. DISCURSIVE POS Goal: to measure POS that is not just based on institutional policies and practices, but also at the level of discourses and public representations. Methods: analysis of claims-making through newspaper reports. Results: only preliminary, but interesting contrasts between institutional & discursive POS. Interpretation also +1/-1.

23. DISCURSIVE POS BY CITY (preliminary results, pending several cities)

24. DISCURSIVE POS BY ACTOR (all cities together)

25. NATIONAL/SUBNATIONAL (INSTITUTIONAL POS)

27. NATIONAL/SUBNATIONAL (DISCURSIVE POS)

30. SHARE OF MIGRANT ACTORS IN CLAIM-MAKING