Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 8: Stat.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 8: Stat."— Presentation transcript:

1 University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 8: Stat OD Processes 1

2 University of Colorado Boulder  Homework 1 Graded ◦ Comments included on D2L ◦ Any questions, talk with us this week  Homework 2 CAETE due Today ◦ Graded soon after  Homework 3 due Today  Homework 4 due next week 2

3 University of Colorado Boulder  A few questions on Problem 4’s Laplace Transform.  There’s one Transform missing from the table:  Note: This has been posted in the HW3 discussions on D2L for a few days now. Check there if you have a commonly-asked question! 3

4 University of Colorado Boulder 4

5 University of Colorado Boulder 5

6 University of Colorado Boulder 6

7 University of Colorado Boulder 7

8 University of Colorado Boulder 8

9 University of Colorado Boulder 9

10 University of Colorado Boulder 10

11 University of Colorado Boulder 11

12 University of Colorado Boulder 12

13 University of Colorado Boulder  Truth  Reference  Best Estimate  Observations are functions of state parameters, but usually NOT state parameters.  Mismodeled dynamics  Underdetermined system. 13

14 University of Colorado Boulder  We have noisy observations of certain aspects of the system.  We need some way to relate each observation to the trajectory that we’re estimating. 14 Observed Range Computed Range True Range = ??? X*X*

15 University of Colorado Boulder  We have noisy observations of certain aspects of the system.  We need some way to relate each observation to the trajectory that we’re estimating. 15 Observed Range Computed Range True Range = ??? ε = O-C = “Residual” X*X*

16 University of Colorado Boulder  Assumptions: ◦ The reference/nominal trajectory is near the truth trajectory.  Linear approximations are decent ◦ Force models are good approximations for the duration of the measurement arc. ◦ The filter that we’re using is unbiased:  The filter’s best estimate is consistent with the true trajectory. 16

17 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 17 Residuals = ε = O-C

18 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 18 Residuals = ε = O-C

19 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 19 Residuals = ε = O-C No

20 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 20 Residuals = ε = O-C No

21 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 21 Residuals = ε = O-C No Not bad

22 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data? 22 Residuals = ε = O-C No Not bad

23 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we best fit the data?  A good solution, and one easy to code up, is the least-squares solution 23

24 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map an observation to the trajectory? 24 Observed Range Computed Range ε = O-C = “Residual” X*X*

25 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map an observation to the trajectory? 25

26 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map an observation to the trajectory?  Very non-linear relationships!  Need to linearize to make a practical algorithm. 26

27 University of Colorado Boulder  Linearization  Introduce the state deviation vector  If the reference/nominal trajectory is close to the truth trajectory, then a linear approximation is reasonable. 27

28 University of Colorado Boulder  Goal of the Stat OD process:  Find a new state/trajectory that best fits the observations:  If the reference is near the truth, then we can assume: 28

29 University of Colorado Boulder  Goal of the Stat OD process:  The best fit trajectory is represented by 29 This is what we want

30 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map the state deviation vector from one time to another? 30 X*X*

31 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map the state deviation vector from one time to another?  The state transition matrix. 31

32 University of Colorado Boulder  How do we map the state deviation vector from one time to another?  The state transition matrix.  It permits: 32

33 University of Colorado Boulder  The state transition matrix maps a deviation in the state from one epoch to another.  It is constructed via numerical integration, in parallel with the trajectory itself. 33

34 University of Colorado Boulder  The “A” Matrix: 34

35 University of Colorado Boulder  Still need to know how to map measurements from one time to a state at another time! 35

36 University of Colorado Boulder  Still need to know how to map measurements from one time to a state at another time!  Would like this: 36

37 University of Colorado Boulder  Still need to know how to map measurements from one time to a state at another time! 37

38 University of Colorado Boulder  Still need to know how to map measurements from one time to a state at another time!  Define: 38

39 University of Colorado Boulder  The Mapping Matrix 39

40 University of Colorado Boulder  Now we can map an observation to the state at an epoch. 40 Observed Range Computed Range ε = O-C = “Residual” X*X*

41 University of Colorado Boulder  We have the method of least squares

42 University of Colorado Boulder  We have the method of least squares

43 University of Colorado Boulder  We have the method of least squares

44 University of Colorado Boulder  We have the method of least squares

45 University of Colorado Boulder 45

46 University of Colorado Boulder Or in component form: Expressed in first order form:

47 University of Colorado Boulder

48 University of Colorado Boulder

49 University of Colorado Boulder

50 University of Colorado Boulder  Homework 1 Graded ◦ Comments included on D2L ◦ Any questions, talk with us this week  Homework 2 CAETE due Today ◦ Graded soon after  Homework 3 due Today  Homework 4 due next week 50


Download ppt "University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 8: Stat."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google