Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TAC Subaru UM 2008 K. Shimasaku (chair) - TAC Members - Statistics - Review Process - 08B Schedule - Notice.

Published byMagdalen Gibson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "TAC Subaru UM 2008 K. Shimasaku (chair) - TAC Members - Statistics - Review Process - 08B Schedule - Notice."— Presentation transcript:

1 TAC Report @ Subaru UM 2008 K. Shimasaku (chair) - TAC Members - Statistics - Review Process - 08B Schedule - Notice

2 Current Members (5 th generation) K. Shimasaku (Tokyo, chair) T. Onaka (Tokyo) M. Doi (Tokyo) H. Kawakita (Kyoto Sangyo) T. Kodama (NAOJ)* T. Shigeyama (Tokyo)* T. Totani (Kyoto) T. Nagata (Kyoto)* T. Murayama (Tohoku) * reappointed ( 再任 ) ( 綱吉 )

3 Statistics Number of approved proposals Competition decreasing, but still high (~3) number ratio submitted approved ratio 0 2 4 6 8 10

4 Statistics Number of allocated nights Competition rate ~ 4 requested allocated ratio ratio 0 2 4 6 8 10

5 Comments from referees to TAC Referee A: I have read through the proposals. They range from very good to excellent. It is quite impressive. Congratulations to NAOJ for having such a competitive groups of users. Referee B: I found most of the proposals to be quite competitive and wish all but a few could be given time.

6 Review Process 18 categories ⇒ 8 groups (each has ~20 proposals) A-1 : solar, extrasolar B-1 : star formation, ISM B-2 : normal stars B-3 : compact objects and SNe C-1 : galaxy clusters, GL, LSS, cosm.params C-2 : high-z C-3 : nearby galaxies, LG, MW, starburst, misc C-4 : AGN/QSO, QSO abs. 5 referees for each group (Japanese = 3) Selection - relative scores (from referees) + TAC review - consider min nights, continuation, … - challenging (thus low-score) proposals can survive Service Proposals Each proposal is reviewed by 3 TAC members - deviated scores - science impacts - requested nights - comments from SS

7 08B Call for Proposals (plan) Feb 8 announcement (tennet, web) Mar 7 normal/intensive submission deadline Apr 11 service submission deadline early June results sent to PIs

8 Notice Change in category High-z Galaxies ⇒ High-z Galaxy Properties, Galaxy Formation MOIRCS mask number Describe # of masks in “11. Instrument Requirements” One proposal one chance Do not submit the same proposal to “Normal” and “Time Exchange” Common targets in normal and service proposals When submitting a normal and a service proposals and some targets are common, describe them in both proposals If you have any questions about instruments etc Please do not hesitate to contact the SS

Download ppt "TAC Subaru UM 2008 K. Shimasaku (chair) - TAC Members - Statistics - Review Process - 08B Schedule - Notice."

Similar presentations

Global IS/IT 2009-1-17 TCL Communication Technology Ltd. e-PAS Training.

Global IS/IT TCL Communication Technology Ltd. e-PAS Training.
Two Issues Concerning Research Conferences Dave Patterson October 2004.

Two Issues Concerning Research Conferences Dave Patterson October 2004.
CMEF Requirements for the Monitoring tables as part of the Annual Report RD committee 24/10/2007.

CMEF Requirements for the Monitoring tables as part of the Annual Report RD committee 24/10/2007.
OPC matters Simon Morris. Topics for possible Discussion Simon Morris is OPC Chair for period 80 and 81 Rapid turnover planned for Panel membership Large.

OPC matters Simon Morris. Topics for possible Discussion Simon Morris is OPC Chair for period 80 and 81 Rapid turnover planned for Panel membership Large.
1 AAO AusGO : 29 June 2009 Demystifying the Queue at Gemini Observatory AAO Epping - 29 June 2009 Henry Lee Gemini South, Chile.

1 AAO AusGO : 29 June 2009 Demystifying the Queue at Gemini Observatory AAO Epping - 29 June 2009 Henry Lee Gemini South, Chile.
December 21-22, 2005Subaru Users Meeting, Mitaka Status of Remote Observation / Service Observation Junichi Noumaru Subaru Telescope National Astronomical.

December 21-22, 2005Subaru Users Meeting, Mitaka Status of Remote Observation / Service Observation Junichi Noumaru Subaru Telescope National Astronomical.
High School Business Heroes 2014 Opening Ceremonies February 25, 2014.

High School Business Heroes 2014 Opening Ceremonies February 25, 2014.
1 www.milestonegroup.ca. 2 Our Web Site How does the Web Site enhance our Service? Provides a more efficient and responsive means of requesting and tracking.

1 2 Our Web Site How does the Web Site enhance our Service? Provides a more efficient and responsive means of requesting and tracking.
TAC report Subaru UM 2011 TAC Members (10A~11B) M. Doi (Univ. of Tokyo) Y. Ito (Kobe Univ.) N. Kashikawa (NAOJ) H. Kawakita (Kyoto Sangyo Univ.) T. Murayama.

TAC report Subaru UM 2011 TAC Members (10A~11B) M. Doi (Univ. of Tokyo) Y. Ito (Kobe Univ.) N. Kashikawa (NAOJ) H. Kawakita (Kyoto Sangyo Univ.) T. Murayama.
Weak Lensing Study of DM sub halos in Coma Cluster T. Futamase Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan 29 th Apr. Collaborators:

Weak Lensing Study of DM sub halos in Coma Cluster T. Futamase Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan 29 th Apr. Collaborators:
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: 21-23 June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.

19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 25-26 Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 29-30 Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec 15 2009  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.

Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  21-25 June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 

Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, 19-20 Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.

Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec 15 2008  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.

Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
Subaru Observations of Galaxy Clusters at z

Subaru Observations of Galaxy Clusters at z
General introduction: HSC collaboration meeting at Princeton Yasushi Suto Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo (Global Scholar, Dept. of Astrophys.

General introduction: HSC collaboration meeting at Princeton Yasushi Suto Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo (Global Scholar, Dept. of Astrophys.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 15-16 Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google