1. Solid Waste Systems Planning Develop Scenarios for future Solid Waste Management Create a review process for the TAC Organize the Subgroup proposals to allow for the comparison of information Avoid repetitive work efforts by Subgroups

2. MJSWTG Guiding Principles Maintain Local Control Develop Regional Services Increase Waste Diversion Be Economically Efficient Develop a Reliable System Provide for Flexibility

3. Other Influences Required by Regulation or Statue Market Readiness Ability to Permit Local Acceptability Time Frame

4. MJSWTG Outcomes Propose the future Integrated Solid Waste Management System for Santa Barbara County Report back to respective Jurisdictions Update State Planning Documents Implement plan

5. TAC Evaluation Process Develop Template for sub group proposals Identify Screening and Evaluation Criteria Organize proposals into Solid Waste Management Scenarios TAC to review for gaps and overlaps in the System Process is likely to be iterative Forward top scenarios to MJSWTG for consideration

6. Executive Summary Template MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL SOLID WASTE TASK GROUP ₪ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TEMPLATE CATEGORY: TITLE: MAJOR FEATURES & CHARACTERISTICS: TARGETED MATERIAL: APPLICATION TO GUIDING PRINCIPLES: LOCAL CONTROL REGIONAL SERVICES WASTE DIVERSION ECONOMIC EFFICIENCIES RELIABILITY FLEXIBILITY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (Evaluating Positive and Negative Features

7. Executive Summary Template Category Program, Policy or Mandate Diversion/ Conversion Facility Landfill Options Project Title Project Features and Characteristics Targeted Material Application to Guiding Principles

8. Guiding Principles Local Control Owned and Operated by Local Government Publicly Owned, Independently Operated Publicly Operated, Independently Owned By Contract By License Other Not Provided

9. Guiding Principles Regional Services is provide to the entire county is provide to a single waste shed and could include other waste sheds is provided to a single waste shed other

10. Guiding Principles Waste Diversion How many new tons of diversion can be anticipated with this proposal How will this proposal extend the capacity of landfills

11. Guiding Principles Economic Efficiencies State the capital cost of your proposal in current dollars Identify annual operating costs What is the cost per ton of material handled What is the cost per new ton of diverted material

12. Guiding Principles Reliability (It there when you need it) To what extent is the proposal commonly used or is a proven approach in the U.S. What is the long term outlook for the material in the market place

13. Guiding Principles Flexibility How would the proposal be expand to included additional material How would the proposal be contracted based upon reduced material How flexible is the proposal to evolving regulation

14. Screening and Evaluation Criteria The Sonoma County Case Study Eliminate Proposals that are not desired  The TAC may have already eliminated these type of proposals or have been eliminated by the work of the subgroups Preliminary Screening of Proposals  Sonoma County used the County’s Solid Waste Siting Element Review Remaining Proposals in Detail  Based upon TAC comments Subgroups would refine information or add details Proposals Arranged into Scenarios  Nine Scenarios identified Scenarios voted upon and forwarded on  Three possible Scenarios considered

15. Next Steps Approve the Executive Summary Template Provide Direction for the Screening and Evaluation Process Provide Direction for Scenario Development