Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Anant Konanahalli Kristine Werling John Toman Ellie Bensinger

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Anant Konanahalli Kristine Werling John Toman Ellie Bensinger"— Presentation transcript:

1 Anant Konanahalli Kristine Werling John Toman Ellie Bensinger
Listening For Signals Anant Konanahalli Kristine Werling John Toman Ellie Bensinger

2 Mission Def-D-6 “Define Drake’s 6th Variable” Fc = fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space.

3 Why listen for signals? The ability of an extraterrestrial civilization to send a signal would indicate their presence and intelligence. Def-D-6

4 What are we looking for? “Radio signals coming from outer space that have no causal factors” –SETI “Narrow-bandwidth radio signals: --SETI Not known to occur naturally Indicate artificial source = Extraterrestrial Life Def-D-6

5 Focus Projects 1) Allen Array Telescope 2) Big Ear 3) SETI@home
Def-D-6 Plan Proposal Focus Projects 1) Allen Array Telescope 2) Big Ear 3) Projects to Cut CETI Def-D-6

6 Allen Telescope Array: What is it?
‘One Hectare Telescope’ 2007 at Hat Creek Observatory, Cascade Mountains SETI Institute + Radio Astronomy Laboratory Def-D-6

7 Allen Telescope Array: What does it do?
Purpose Two-Fold Conventional radio astronomy projects SETI SETI Focus 1) Sky sweep survey 2) Targeted Searches Data collected 4.5 octaves of frequency Def-D-6

8 Def-D-6

9 Allen Telescope Array: How does it do it?
LNSD array = Large Number of Small Dishes 42 dishes Pseudo-random arrangement 1 km circle Def-D-6

10 Allen Telescope Array: How does it do it?
Basic Signal Collection Radio waves collected at antenna Radio waves focused Converted to electrical signals Amplified Processed Beam Width Limitation: Sinθ= 1.22λ/D Def-D-6

11 Allen Telescope Array: How does it do it?
Array Advantage Combined to form equivalent of single large dish Beam Width Limitation: Sinθ= 1.22λ/D Def-D-6

12 Allen Telescope Array: How does it do it?
Adjustments to ‘listen’ in different directions Alter cable lengths and electronic delays Bring waves from different direction in-phase Def-D-6

13 Allen Telescope Array: How does it do it?
Offset Optic or Gregarian Antenna System “Because sometimes, as in football, going to the side can reduce interference” Def-D-6

14 Allen Telescope Array: Why Invest?
Array vs Single Large Disk Lower cost Easier adjustments/repairs Easy to add on/improve Multipurposed Radio astronomy SETI Speed up SETI searches 24hr data collection Simultaneity Larger sky area Def-D-6

15 Allen Telescope Array: Modifications
Expand to the “Square Kilometer Array” Expand to 350 dishes Angular resolution of 700 meter diameter dish Comparable to Robert C. Byrd Telescope and Very Large Array Def-D-6

16 Ohio State University Radio Observatory (Big Ear)
John D. Kraus, built/design Small Ear Prototype NSF grant to start Big Ear Considerably less than req’d Had to scale down 2000 ft.360 ft. in length Main Components Flat Reflector Paraboloidal Reflector Feed Horns Def-D-6

17 Big Ear: Flat Reflector
340 ft. x 100 ft. Wire Mesh Ability to tilt Unfocused waves Ground Plane Wire Mesh was used so that radio waves would reflect, but light waves would pass right through The flat screen was tilted every 3 or 4 days The waves only bounce off the flat reflector, but need to be focused The point of the ground plane was to insulate the telescope so that radio waves could not get in or out (except from the reflected mesh) Def-D-6

18 Big Ear: Paraboloidal Reflector
360 ft. x 170 ft. Focused the sent waves Wavelengths ~21.1 cm (8.3 inches) MHz Def-D-6

19 Big Ear: Feed Horns Two Horns Funneled waves Signal Switch (79x)
Why Switch? See the same area twice in minutes Removed variation due to drift and sky variation Def-D-6

20 Big Ear: Recap

21 Big Ear: WOW! Signal Jerry R. Ehman 1977 Coded Intensity
Found at 1420 MHz Sagittarius Lasted 72 seconds, not replicated Even Very Large Array could not detect Earth-borne signal reflected off space debris One-time burst Intensity was scaled using an alphanumeric code, the 6EQUJ5 then shows an increasing intensity up to a peak of about 30 times normal deep space Def-D-6

22 Big Ear: Justifications for Use
Started from NSF grant of $48,000 $450,000 today with inflation Need to resolve this signal via further investigation Physically impossible for WOW! to bounce off of debris, 1420 MHz is restricted, something is up. Very Large Array ($78.5M) is very similar and has made key observations of black holes and protoplanetary disks. Def-D-6

23 SETI@home: Overview Released to the public in May of 1999
Over 5 million users worldwide Has completed 2 million hours of computing time Primary Goals 1) to do useful scientific work by supporting an observational analysis to detect intelligent life outside Earth 2) to prove the viability and practicality of the 'volunteer computing' concept. Def-D-6

24 SETI@home: How it Works
Searches for possible radio transmissions from ETs Uses observational data from Arecibo Data digitized and sent to Wire Mesh was used so that radio waves would reflect, but light waves would pass right through The flat screen was tilted every 3 or 4 days The waves only bounce off the flat reflector, but need to be focused The point of the ground plane was to insulate the telescope so that radio waves could not get in or out (except from the reflected mesh) Def-D-6

25 SETI@home: How it Works
Parses data into millions of very small chunks Anyone can download software onto their computer Personal computers use processing power to analyze these chunks (variations) How it Works Def-D-6

26 SETI@home: Justifications
doesn’t use government funding Berkeley has found ways to work with small budgets and donations Increasing power of home computers/laptops Other applications of interest Def-D-6

27 SETI@home: Possible Modifications
Alternative to Arecibo telescope Better hardware quality Increased marketing efforts Def-D-6

28 CETI Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence Subset of SETI
Researching effective means of communication CETI - Majority of SET involves listening, but there is a part of the SETI movement dedicated to trying to communicate with ET by sending out messages Communication with Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence Subsect of SETI in many projects and institutions researching most effective means of communication Def-D-6

29 Previous CETI projects
Arecibo Message (1974): Radio message to starcluster M13 Binary- DNA, Map of Solar System Cosmic Calls 1 and 2 (1999) Sent to several stars Contained text, audio, video, “Rosetta Stone” version of Arecibo Doritos Commercial (2008) Arecidbo: binary message sent via radio waves containing atomic numbers of elements in DNA, graphic of our solar system, etc Cosmic calls 1,2: - "Rosetta Stone", copy of Arecibo Message, Bilingual Image Glossary, the Braastad message, as well as text, audio, video and other image files submitted for transmission by everyday people around the world. The "Rosetta Stone" was composed by Stephane Dumas and Yvan Dutil and represents a multi-page bitmap that builds a vocabulary of symbols representing numbers and mathematical operations. Doritos: held a contest, winner’s commercial was broadcast to a solar system 42 ly away Def-D-6

30 CETI entails… Hiring social scientists: Douglas Vachok
Creating mathematical and scientific languages Creating pictorial languages Lincos: Lingua cosmica Figuring out best representation Binary, Radio, Pulse Freudenthal, Hans. - Lincos; Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse Def-D-6

31 Noble but not necessary yet…
Already so much data to decode “Linear A” problem Un-decoded early human language SETI- Interstellar Message Composition Closest Earth like planet: Gliese 581 system 20 light years away 40 year exchange Receiving so much data from other projects, put manpower on interpreting this data! Difficult to decode when you know nothing about the society – fundamental modes of communication Vachok- director of interstellar communication entire department devoted to CETI, only social scientist employed by SETI - I think the idea of sending messages to aliens is very romantic its not where we should be focusing our resources. Reallocating these funds to the projects previously discussed could help givethose projects the green light: ie SETI would save $100,000 a year by eliminating this department Def-D-6

32 First Things First Fund programs that are looking for incoming data
Most likely way of detecting life Once we find something, then maybe CETI Suggests that there is the possibility of a dialogue between cultures We have only been emitting for about 100 years, which is fraction of earths existance Other society would have to be in this 100 year window of development at exact same time And who knows how long this phase will last.. Our emissions are dwindling converting to other technologies that don’t leave atmosphere Def-D-6

33 References Douglas A. Vakoch. "To the Stars, Silently." Leonardo 37.4 (2004): Project MUSE. Web. 7 May <   Douglas A. Vakoch. "The Art and Science of Interstellar Message Composition." Leonardo 37.1 (2004): Project MUSE. Web. 7 May < Freudenthal, Hans. Lincos; Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub., 1960. "SETI Institute." SETI Institute. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 May 2013. Def-D-6


Download ppt "Anant Konanahalli Kristine Werling John Toman Ellie Bensinger"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google