1. THE EASTFORD LINEAMENT EVIDENCE FOR A LATE –STAGE REGIONAL FRACTURE ZONE IN EASTERN CONNECTICUT AND SOUTH-CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: Implications for the Origin of the Moodus Area Seismicity
Robert J. Altamura, Consulting Geologist
Ronald Marple, U.S. Army
Shelton S. Alexander, Geosciences, Penn State University
James Hurd, Natural Resources & the Environment, University of Connecticut

2. GOAL: FIND NEOTECTONIC BRITTLE STRUCTURES IN CONNECTICUT.
We went about searching for neotectonic structures by regional study of
Geology (previously mapped faults)
Topographic lineaments (this study)
SLAR lineaments (Altamura, 1987)
LiDAR lineaments (this study)
Field investigation (this study)
Seismic data base (Weston Observatory)
Borehole geophysical data for the Moodus deep well (Plumb and Horner, 1988)
Seismographic analyses (Ebel and Bouck, 1988, Ebel, 1989, Quittmeyer et al., 1988)
Seismic profiling of the Moodus lineament (Alexander et al.)

3. the concentration near the Moodus seismic area.
Earthquake epicenters for 137 quakes that originated in Connecticut since Note
the concentration near the Moodus seismic area.
(From de Boer (2009) after Dina Smith, Weston Observatory of Boston College)

4. LiDAR image

5. LiDAR IMAGE OF NORTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT
3 mi
Mt. Tom
L. Pocotopaug
Moodus
Mansfield Hollow
Lake
Willimantic
Pickerel Lake
Middletown
Hartford
Columbia
Colchester
LiDAR IMAGE OF NORTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT

6. Because of sparse outcrops and the effects of late Pleistocene glaciation, we developed a list of geomorphic criteria to help distinguish between lineaments caused by brittle fractures and those produced by surface activity.
Geomorphic criteria
Scarps
Saddles
Gulleys across the side of ridges
Linear valleys
and drainage patterns
Deflected streams

8. Generalized geologic map of eastern Connecticut by M. Pease (1989).
Eastford Q. U D
Spring Hill Q.

9. Eastford Fault
The Eastford fault was named by M. Pease as result of his mapping in the Eastford and Spring Hill quads.

10. LiDAR image of eastern Connecticut illuminated from the SE
LiDAR image of eastern Connecticut illuminated from the SE. Note the subparallel NNW-trending lineament the denote the direction Wisconsinan glacial ice movement. The NE-trending trace of the Eastford fault is demoted by the two arrows.

11. Portion of the Moodus 7.5 quad: LiDAR imagery and USGS topo map showing interpretations.

13. LIDAR IMAGE OF NORTHEASTERN CONECTICUT
Mansfield Hollow
Lake
Hartford
Columbia
Willimantic
L. Pocotopaug
Colchester
Middletown
Pickerel Lake
Moodus N
Mt. Tom
3 mi

14. Trace of the Eastford lineament near the Moodus seismic area was determined by linears, gulleys, saddles, and scarps. Width estimated from the profile of saddles and gulleys.
One way of seeing bedrock through the haze of soil and glacial deposits is drilling.
Three (3) important research wells near the Moodus seismic area have provided geologists with a variety of useful data on which to see through the haze. These include a 500m (1500 ft) well at the foot of Gillette Castle on the eastern bank of the Connecticut River and a 330m (1000 ft) well along the southeast bank of the Salmon River NW of Moodus. Both wells were drilled during 1984 and sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Borehole geophysics on the Gillette Castle and Salmon River wells were carried out by the USGS and Engineers International. Because hydrofracture data implied an anomalous NW to WNW-ESE compression for the Moodus seismic area, this site was chosen for further study – and during 1986 a decision was made to drill a hole to a depth of 1600m (4784 ft). This borehole research was sponsored by the Empire State Electric Energy Research Corp., Northeast Utilities, and Electric Power Research Institute. Geophysical logging was carried out by Schlumberger Wireline Services, Schlumberger-Doll Research, the Borehole Research Group at Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and the Borehole Research Group of Stanford University.
It was this third well that proved to be most beneficial to our lineament study.

15. Trace of the Eastford lineament through part of the Moodus seismic area.
(from Marple and others,
in press, 2012)

16. Cross section across the Moodus segment of the Eastford lineament showing the relative locations of the Moodus deep well, cluster of 1987 seismicity, and the EL.
Note that the 70 degree NW dip projected from the lineament goes through the center of the seismic cluster. The zone portrayed by screened gray was constructed using the 70 degree angle and bound by the upper and lower depth boundaries of the 1987 cluster (from Quittmeyer et al., 1988)

17. (modified from Plumb and Hornsby, 1988)
CGNHS newsletter, June 23, 1987
CGNHS
Borehole geophysical data and lithologic log of the Moodus deep research well.

19. LIDAR IMAGE OF NORTHEASTERN CONECTICUT
Mansfield Hollow
Lake
Hartford
Columbia
Willimantic
L. Pocotopaug
Colchester
Middletown
Pickerel Lake
Moodus N
Mt. Tom
3 mi

20. Trace of the Eastford lineament through the Ponset Brook floodplain
Trace of the Eastford lineament through the Ponset Brook floodplain. The trace of
the lineament correlates to the location of the fault by Lundgren who mapped
A high-angle fault based on the map offset of the Jurassic Higganum diabase dike. The
Dike dips moderately to steeply to the west and to explain the offset, the SE block
Would logically be up.

21. f220-82, +70
Fault breccia zone exposed at the Route 9 interchange near the village of Ponset is
subparallel to the trend of the Eastford lineament. The width of the breccia zone is ~3m.

23. Eastford lineament superimposed.
Earthquake epicenters for 137 quakes that originated in Connecticut since 1678 with the
Eastford lineament superimposed.
(From de Boer (2009) after Dina Smith, Weston Observatory of Boston College)

24. CONCLUSIONS
The Eastford Lineament is a demonstrated fracture zone over ~80% of its length.
Where bedrock mapping evidence was not available, interpretation of LiDAR Imagery and topographic maps suggest the continuity of EL/EF as a composite structure.
In the case of the Moodus segment of the EL, a fault model is supported by the integration of seismic data and analysis for the 1987 earthquake swarm (Ebel and Bouck, 1988, Ebel, 1989, Quittmeyer, 1988) and borehole geophysical data Plumb and Horner, 1988) with our lineament mapping.
The Eastford lineament is a regional fracture zone. The segment through the Moodus seismic area is a potentially active fault that we believe was a likely cause of the 1987 earthquake swarm. The Eastford structure warrants further study.