Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamund Doyle Modified over 9 years ago
1
EMPAct and slip control: key elements to efficiency improvement of the pushbelt CVT Bram Veenhuizen, Bram Bonsen, Tim Klaassen, Patrick Albers (TU Eindhoven), Christophe Changenet, Stéphane Poncy (ECAM Lyon) 2004 International Continuously Variable and Hybrid Transmission Congress September 23-25, 2004 04CVT-49
2
2 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Related papers 04CVT-3: Modelling Shift Speed Characteristics of a Pushbelt type CVT Oral Only: Measurement and Control of Slip in a CVT 04CVT-8: Proposal for an Electromechanical Ratio and Clamping Force Actuator for a Metal V-belt Type CVT 04CVT-13 Control-Oriented Identification of an Electromechanically Actuated Metal V-belt CVT
3
3 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Contents Variator actuation: state of the art. Reference transmission efficiency analysis Efficiency improvement options –EMPAct system –slip control Loss comparison, loss reduction Conclusions & recommendations Next steps
4
4 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl LuK/Audi control (Multitronic) Double piston and two stage torque sensor technology Cam disc 1 Cam disc 2 Cam disc 1
5
5 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Servo-electro-hydraulic Variator Control Hydraulic servo technique, driven by stepper motor. Closed loop ratio and pressure control. Over clamping still needed due to inaccuracies in torque estimation. ECU TCU Torqu e signal HC12
6
6 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Reference transmission 200 Nm; 110 kW Variator Final reduction Oil pump Main loss sources:
7
7 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Efficiency Analysis Pump driving power Variator losses –Variator torque loss –Variator slip loss Final reduction losses
8
8 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Pump driving power
9
9 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Variator Torque loss
10
10 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Efficiency vs Safety 1500 [rpm] over-drive
11
11 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Variator slip loss Normal Operating Area slip loss: few tenths of percent
12
12 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Loss breakdown of reference transmission 1500 [rpm] over-drive
13
13 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Improvement options (actuation and control) Avoid over clamping completely Avoid hydraulic limitations for low clamping forces Reduce actuation power rigorously Avoid bandwidth limitation Proposed system: Servo-electromechanical actuation Slip control
14
14 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl TU/e EMPAct system Avoid hydraulic non-linearities Focus: slip control (S f =1) F sec =unknown! Force balance Use electric power (hybrids) In steady state: 200 W at 200 Nm
15
15 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Traction curve: Compare with ASR Variator Tire Desirable operating point Typical traction curve in Overdrive
16
16 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Gaining efficiency with increased slip S f =3 S f ~1 Efficiency. gain
17
17 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Slip control test rig; pulley position sensor
18
18 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Slip control benefits Maximized efficiency Lower variator load leading to higher power density or more ratio coverage Increased robustness (!) Probably leads to more dynamic ratio shifting Also applicable to hydraulic systems Lower hydraulic pressure
19
19 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Loss comparison ReferenceEMPAct & slip control
20
20 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Loss reduction
21
21 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Conclusions & Recommendations CVT efficiency still offers room for improvement. Servo actuation and slip control offer great efficiency potential. Develop CVT-ASR. We need small cheap servo-motors of <200 Watt continuous, ~750 Watt peak and low power consumption at low speed. (depends on CVT spec). Slip sensing device is needed.
22
22 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Next steps Realise EMPAct proto; perform no- load tests. Develop control strategy (slip&ratio). Implement slip control on dyno. Implement slip control in car. In preparation for 3rd International CTI Symposium (Würzburg, Nov 30-Dec 2, 2004) Combine EMPAct and slip control in a car. Validate efficiency and fuel consumption. First results
23
23 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl TR3 Dyno (110 kW, Jatco CK2) Implement slip control on a dyno
24
24 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Slip Controller More details: American Control Conference (ACC), June 8 to 10, 2005 Portland, Oregon LVDT, mounted in CK2
25
25 www.aes.wtb.tue.nl Preliminary results Low, controlled 200 rad/sec
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.