1. The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006

2. Quick Review of Technical Status

3. Statewide Monitoring Inventory Urban Strong Motion974 Broadband + Strong Motion208 Short Period + Strong Motion77 Analog Short Period500 Borehole51 Geotechnical Arrays22 Buildings221 Bridges70 Dams26 Others13 Others13 New/Upgraded/Moved in 2006 UCB (USArray)3 NCSN (SAFOD)4 SCSN (USArray)7 CGS (reference/structures)18/34

4. Focused Urban Monitoring

5. CGS CIT –5 strong motion stations in metropolitan Los Angeles region UCB CIT –30 strong motion & broadband stations statewide –Goal to exchange 60 stations Dual Data Transmission

6. CISN Backbone 5 dedicated T1 links Auto-failover to Internet via IP tunnels Monitoring/alarming software operational Networks now exchanging CISN seismic data

7. Integration and Standardization Real and near real-time integration of parametric and waveform data from 13 seismic networks –PG&E as of 8/17/2006 –Calpine soon? Developing software to integrate of CGS, CI/USGS, NCSN, and UCB real-time systems

8. CISN Webpage

9. Progress toward Statewide Monitoring through CISN Software

10. Melding of many complex systems –Earthworm front-end –TriNet back-end –NCEDC/SCEDC data archiving –Java, C, C++, Perl, SQL, Fortran, Solaris, Windows, Oracle, etc.. Same software across CISN means: –Same configurations, same products –Full parametric exchange –All waveforms used (including NSMP, CGS) –New methods easier to implement –Failover behavior can be modeled and understood Code is now developed by all partners –An example of how CISN works well –An example of how CISN doesn’t work well

11. SCSN: RT system

12. NC ≠ SC Network split across the SF Bay –Requirement for robust operation if one half fails Different systems –Field hardware –Telemetry –Institutions –Software Cannot compute ML for all quakes Menlo ParkBerkeley

13. Required development for NC implementation Replaced proprietary messaging software with CMS software Implementation of “location” codes (statewide) Station metadata Proxy waveserver Implementation of Md in Trinet software ML calibration (statewide) Testing, testing, testing

14. NCSS Software Transition Status Post-processing –Prototype functional as of July, 2006 –Md implemented and Q/C’ed –SNC → SNCL ready –Testing and training –10/15/2006 switch Real-time processing –After post-processing switch –Conversion of alarming software –New quick-review –Testing –12/31/2006 switch

15. CISN: Statewide Version 1.0 Will rely on three real-time services: –Continuous “reduced” amplitude exchange –“Pick” exchange –Proxy waveserver for post-processing Real-time alarming –NC and SC will each alarm for their authoritative box for M<4.0 and statewide for M≥4.0. –The QDM filter will post the first solution, which in some cases may be superseded by the authoritative solution, or possibly NEIC. Statewide ShakeMap –Produce statewide ShakeMap at three centers (PAS, MP/BK, and CGS). –Operate one statewide web portal for ShakeMap Post-Processing and Archiving –Each center (PAS and MP/BK) will post-process and archive parameters and waveforms in it's region of responsibility. –CGS will post-process and distribute SM data and engineering quick reports. Timeline: Prototype by 30 June 2007

16. Budget and Funding

17. The CISN Strategic Plan goals were established for the level of funding that we anticipated in 2001. At its inception in 2001 the CISN asked OES for $6.6M per year. –This funding was cut to and has remained at the $2.4M per year for the last three years. Full ANSS funding expected in 2001 and subsequent years has not occurred. –level-funding for CIT, UCB, and USGS NCSN/SCSN and NSMP network operations for the last three years Funding Status (review)

18. CISN 2005 Funding Overview USGS/ANSS $7.7M –NCSN (USGS Menlo Park) –UCB/REDI and UCB/NCEDC –SCSN (Caltech & USGS Pasadena) SCEDC –UCLA (Factor) –UCSD (Anza) –NSMP apportioned OES $2.4M –Caltech –UCB –CGS CGS/CSMIP $5.4M –Buildings –Lifelines –Ground response (~1/3 of budget effort) UC Berkeley $0.5M SCEC $0.15M Caltech ~$0.2M USArray ~$0.2M NOAA - $0.1M

19. CISN Funding Total ~$16.65M

20. CISN Expenditures Expenditures for California Seismic Monitoring 7% 15% 47% 9% 12% 10% Process improvement new products New/Upgraded stations Operate and maintain stations DataCenters Real-time operations and response Management

21. New Developments

22. CISN Display V1.3 released 8/29/2006 –“Web services” support –Better GIS layers –Email integration –Scale dependent GIS layers –Sort on magnitude –Events with tsunami info tagged ~420 users registered ~75 users connected

23. Connected Users of CISN Display dot.ca.gov emd.wa.gov hko.gov.hk kmi.com lacofd.org meteorology.gov.mv morganhill.ca.gov mwdh2o.com nbcuni.com noaa.gov abc.com atsb-malaysia.com.my BNSF.com dot.ca.gov calquake.com cityofalhambra.org co.monterey.ca.us co.sanmateo.ca.us conservation.ca.gov dogami.state.or.us oes.ca.gov rdmd.ocgov.com redlandspolice.org scd.hawaii.gov semprautilites.com solanocounty.com tribune.com usace.army.mil water.ca.gov wsdot.wa.gov

24. ENS: Earthquake Notification System User-configurable E-mail & SMS messages Adopted by ANSS 41,000+ users

25. CISN Alert Map (prototype)

26. CISN and EarthScope USArray –Data Sharing from existing stations –Sharing of technology SAFOD –Data recording by NCSN –Data archiving at NCEDC Plate Boundary Observatory –Borehole stations near fault zones –GPS

27. CISN/USGS/SCEC Collaboration on Earthquake Early Warning CISN –Provide waveforms and implement front end processing Caltech/USGS/ UC Berkeley –Development and testing of individual algorithms SCEC –Comparison of performance of algorithms –Testing for great earthquakes using synthetics

28. Conversion of NCSN backbone telemetry Data collected at nodes Analog telemetry precluded upgrades Mix of satellite, leased land lines, and microwave 6 year project

29. NetQuakes RFP USGS SEED funding to develop new SM instrumentation for urban areas Designed to accelerate rate of new installations Current bottlenecks –Purchase Cost –Permitting –Installation –Telemetry costs

30. It will take ~70 years at this rate 3600 more stations needed to achieve Vision 2005 goal of 5500 stations San Fernando TriNet CISN & ANSS Number/Yr

31. NetQuakes hardware COTS computer hardware (~$500) –Removable memory cards –Full O/S (Linux?) –Wireless (802.11g) capability –AC power with modest battery backup –No GPS –NTP synchronization (±10 msec accuracy) ANSS TIC WG-D Class “C-B” hardware (~$300) –Digitizer: ≥ 16bits resolution –Sensor: ≥ 87dB dynamic range over 0.1-35Hz

32. Functionality Triggered only Data queued until successfully uploaded Uploaded data used when event is detected by regional seismic network Periodic SOH messages issued Periodic queries to check for new software Periodic NTP synchronization Ability to add new algorithms

33. Installation and Servicing Volunteer hosts solicited Technician installs device –Bolt cradle, orient device, configure device, determine GPS coordinates Hosts swap out batteries and bad units (not technicians)

34. NetQuakes Status Proposals from vendors due 9/6/2006 Award to be made by 9/26/2006 –At least 3 prototypes –Up to 250 more units Prototypes due no later than 6/30/2007 Goal is 100+ new urban SM stations/year