Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamond Caldwell Modified over 9 years ago
1
www.bay.k12.fl.us
2
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities
3
Modifications to Evidence Collection
4
Domain 1: Evidence Lesson plan Formative At least two lesson plans formatively reviewed by teacher’s evaluating administrator Administrator’s feedback written (i.e. on paper copies or via electronic copy) Use language of the rubric to guide teacher’s growth in the area of lesson planning Review example Lesson plan 1: 1a, 1b, 1c Lesson plan 2: 1d, 1e, 1f Summative 1-2 lesson plans Embodies best work for Domain 1
5
Domain 1: Evidence Pre-Post Observation Questions All of pre-observation questions align to Domain 1 Some of post-observation questions align to Domain 1 Teacher and admin use as discussion points for formative feedback
6
Domain 1: Evidence IPDP Formative feedback opportunities Initial and mid-year (or formative evaluation) Documentation IPDP initial feedback written (i.e. on paper copies printed from AIMS or in AIMS-IPDP section). IPDP mid-year (Cat 3 and 4) or formative feedback (Cat 1 and 2) in AIMS-IPDP section.
7
Domain 1: Evidence Summative Documentation Domain 1 Summary of trends noted (Lesson Planning, Pre/Post Conference, IPDP) relating to Planning and Preparation In AIMS by component Provided during the Initial Interim Rating
8
Reflection Questions Will binders be turned in for the 2012-2013 school year? What formative and summative assessment opportunities are available for Domain 1? Other questions?
9
Domains 2 and 3: Evidence Formative Classroom visits Summative Observation Cycle Documentation Observation information (seen and heard) in AIMS by component
10
Domains 2 and 3: Evidence During the pre-conference discuss the exact components that will be observed Use the post-conference as another opportunity for Domain 2 and 3 Teacher may share evidence that for missing components
11
Domains 2 and 3: Evidence Classroom Pop-In for 1-2 missed components or components requiring additional evidence (10-15 minutes) Full Observation cycle One or the other, not both A pop-in or full observation cycle does not replace information already in existence; it adds additional evidence information
12
Domains 2 and 3: Evidence Complete Observation Cycle at any time. No need to wait until February if ready to complete in November. (Remember to adhere to teacher contract.) Teacher and admin can then complete Domains 2 and 3 and focus the rest of the year on Domains 1 and 4.
13
Reflection and Discussion Must an observation capture all 10 components? What options are available if a component is missed during the observation? Do teachers have to wait until February to complete Domains 2 and 3? Will teachers turn in binders for Domains 2 and 3?
14
Domain 4: Evidence Formative Ongoing administrator formative assessment of regularly submitted teacher evidence using Instructional Practices rubric as guidance Documentation Note trends using rubric language in AIMS by component prior to the IPDP mid-year review (Cat 3 and 4) or formative evaluation (Cat 1 and 2) Summative Add trends to mid-year information by component and using rubric language added
15
Domain 4: Evidence Really important things to note: Teacher can provide additional documentation following initial Interim Summative Rating Teachers limit themselves to 1 to 2 strong pieces of quality documentation with a summary explaining how they feel the new evidence improves the rating provided during the Interim
16
Reflection and Discussion What opportunities are currently in place at this school for teachers to demonstrate Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities What if a teacher thinks that the Initial Interim Rating is missing an important piece of information? Can the teacher turn in additional documentation? What must this documentation be comprised of? Other questions about Domain 4?
17
Modifications to the Timeline
19
Reflection and Discussion Reflect on the timeline thus far. What questions do you have?
23
Reflection and Discussion What differences do you see between last year’s implementation timeline and this one? How do you think the new timeline will help improve the 2012-2013 implementation? What questions do you have about the new timeline?
24
Modifications to the Rubric
25
Rubric Modifications
28
Speak with administrator Contact the ABCE office Contact Dawn Capes capesda@bay.k12.fl.us
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.