1. Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive in Santa Fe, NM Nghia Hoang Kristen Leigher John Mulhern Xiying Zhang and the City of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute

2. Introduction Pre-Statehood History Post Statehood History Recent Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute

3. 3 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 Pre-Statehood History

4. 1598: Location of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute4 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX

5. 1598 - 1610: Moving to Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute5 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX El Camino Real

6. 1610: Founding of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute6 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 More defensible Close to water No direct conflict with the local Pueblo Indians

7. 1680: Pueblo Revolt Worcester Polytechnic Institute7 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 Religious Conflict Native American Victory

8. 1821: Santa Fe Trail Worcester Polytechnic Institute8 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825 San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX El Camino Real Santa Fe Trail

9. 1846-1848: Mexican American War Worcester Polytechnic Institute9 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825

10. 1880: Rail in Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute10 1600 1900 1750 1675 1825

11. Worcester Polytechnic Institute11 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 Post Statehood History

12. 1912: New Mexico’s Statehood Worcester Polytechnic Institute12 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 http://goldenstate.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/your-car-insurance/

13. 1950s: Modern position of trade routes and roads Worcester Polytechnic Institute13 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975

14. Worcester Polytechnic Institute14 St. Michael’s Formation Agua Fria St. Cerrillos Rd. St. Francis Dr. 1.The city’s corridors Interstate 25 Old Pecos Trail

15. Worcester Polytechnic Institute15 St. Michael’s Formation 1.The city’s corridors 2. St. Michael’s Drive as a bridge St. Michael’s Dr. Agua Fria St. Cerrillos Rd. St. Francis Dr. Interstate 25 Old Pecos Trail

16. Worcester Polytechnic Institute16 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 Recent Redevelopment

17. Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute17 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 Early 1900’s

18. Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute18 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 Early 1900’s 2000

19. Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute19 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975 Early 1900’s 2000 2008

20. 2007: Santa Fe Downtown Vision Plan Worcester Polytechnic Institute20 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975

21. 2009: Saint Michael’s Drive Charrette Worcester Polytechnic Institute21 1900 2000 1950 1925 1975

22. Mission Statement The ultimate goal of this project is to assist the City of Santa Fe in establishing baselines of the current state of Saint Michael’s Drive and providing tools to visualize the future redevelopment of the area. Worcester Polytechnic Institute

23. Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

24. Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

25. Collect, organize, and integrate data GIS Layers Traffic Data Census Data Survey Results

26. Previous City Survey and Results Worcester Polytechnic Institute26 What do you like about St. Michael’s Drive as it is today? What would you change about St. Michael’s Drive? What are design aspects presented that you liked? What are design aspects presented that you disliked? Nothing (12) Access/Speed (8) Parking (5) Pedestrian Friendly (7) More Trees and Landscape (7) Bicycle Friendly (6) Pedestrian/Bike Friendly (14) Greenbelts/ Landscaping (6) Multiuse Buildings Near Road (5) Roundabouts (8) Too Contemporary (3)

27. Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

28. 28 Our Survey Results Demographics n= 34 + 50 -large age range -mostly employed -despite range of demographics thoughts are similar

29. Worcester Polytechnic Institute29 Our Survey Results Frequency & Use -Most live near and frequent the area at least once a week -Most come with a purpose and aren’t in the area for leisure or browsing purposes. Demographics

30. Worcester Polytechnic Institute30 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive has an appealing landscape. Somewhat Disagree -commercial feel -could use more trees -busy road Frequency & Use Demographics

31. Worcester Polytechnic Institute31 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive is pedestrian friendly. Somewhat Disagree -few walk street -concerns with large number of students Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape

32. Worcester Polytechnic Institute32 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive is bicycle friendly. Somewhat Disagree -few bike -bikers expressed dangers Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly

33. Worcester Polytechnic Institute33 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive has all the retail I desire. Somewhat Agree -more entertainment -more restaurants Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly

34. Worcester Polytechnic Institute34 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Saint Michael’s Drive is easily accessible without a car. Somewhat Disagree -lack of convenient, reliable public transit -not easily walkable

35. Worcester Polytechnic Institute35 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Saint Michael’s Drive has enough community space. Strongly Disagree -small parks with picnic tables -dog park -trash bins and benches

36. Worcester Polytechnic Institute36 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Saint Michael’s architecture is visually consistant with the rest of Santa Fe. Somewhat Agree -modern look

37. Worcester Polytechnic Institute37 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive is a good idea. Somewhat Agree -more parks and small improvements is well accepted -concerns with money and priorities of city

38. Worcester Polytechnic Institute38 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redevelopment Additional Comments -work on housing in area -train stop -like traffic -more street frontage -elderly accessible -student friendly -clean graffiti

39. Worcester Polytechnic Institute39 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redevelopment Additional Comments

40. Our Survey Summary Lack of community space Not pedestrian friendly Not enough entertainment & restaurants Keep road traffic like it is Not Bicycle Friendly Worcester Polytechnic Institute40

41. Worcester Polytechnic Institute41 Profile Businesses in the Area Saint Michael’s Drive Commercial Profile Map #____ Business Name: ____________________________________________________ Address:__________________________________ ____________________________________ Frontage Measurement (appx feet) : ____________________________ Business Type:___________________________________________________ If retail, what do they sell?:_______________________________________

42. Worcester Polytechnic Institute42 Profile Businesses in the Area Saint Michael’s Drive Commercial Profile Map #_4__ Business Name: __KMart_____________________________________________ Address:__1712 Saint Michaels Drive__________ __Santa Fe, NM 87501______________ __(505)-471-9007___________________ Frontage Measurement (appx feet) : __310 yards_________________ Business Type:___Retail (NAICS code 452112)________________________ If retail, what do they sell?:___food,home,garden,office,apparel,beauty___

44. Retail

45. Accommodations & Food Retail

46. Accommodations & Food Education Retail

47. Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Retail

48. Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Public Administration Retail

49. Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Rental and Leasing Retail Public Administration

50. Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

51. Common Themes From Survey More Parks! Not Enough Entertainment! Bike Path! Train Stop! Trash Bins!

52. Common Themes From Survey

53. Common Themes From Charrette Trees! Parking On Street! Medians! Bike Lanes! Street Frontage!

54. Common Themes From Charrette

55. Trash Bins Dog Parks Not Easily Walkable Poor Public Transit More Parks More Modern Train Stop Elderly Housing Grouping Themes To Make Indicators Survey Charrette Medians Landscaping Trees Intersection Treatment Parking On Street Bike Lanes/ Paths Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Open Building Facades Architectural Step-Backs Arcaded or Covered Walkways Courtyards/ Patios/ Walkways Backstreets/ Alleyways Narrower Driving Lanes Multi-story Buildings Fewer Driving Lanes Parking On Street Street Frontage Sidewalks Density Commercial Feel More Trees Busy Road Many Students Few Walk Few Bike More Restaurants Dangerous More Entertainment Benches Clean Graffiti

56. Vehicular Mobility Medians Intersection Treatment Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Narrower Driving Lanes Fewer Driving Lanes Busy Road Grouping Themes To Make Indicators

57. Public Mobility Green Public Space Business Vitality Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Housing Availability Walkability Vehicular Mobility Medians Landscaping Trees Intersection Treatment Bike Lanes/ Paths Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Open Building Facades Architectural Step-Backs Arcaded or Covered Walkways Courtyards/ Patios/ Walkways Backstreets/ Alleyways Narrower Driving Lanes Multi-story Buildings Fewer Driving Lanes Parking On Street Street Frontage Sidewalks Density Commercial Feel More Trees Busy Road Many Students Few Walk Few Bike More Restaurants Dangerous More Entertainment Benches Not Easily Walkable Poor Public Transit More Parks Dog Parks Clean Graffiti More Modern Trash Bins Train Stop Elderly Housing Street Frontage Multi-story Buildings Multi-story Buildings Backstreets/ Alleyways Grouping Themes To Make Indicators

58. Indicators From Groups INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance

59. Factors of Indicators INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

60. Factors of Indicators WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

61. Measuring Walk Score WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level www.walkscore.com

62. Measuring Curb Cuts WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: cuts/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level

63. Measuring Path Width WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: avg. width/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level

64. Measuring Traffic/ Pedestrian Buffer WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: avg. width/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level Noise Level

65. Measuring Security Level WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: number of crimes in area Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level

66. Measuring Noise Level WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: decibels (db) Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level 4

67. Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level 4 TOTAL

68. Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 82 Curb Cuts 52 Path Width 41.5 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 31.5 Security Level 51.5 Noise Level 41 TOTAL

69. Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 8216 Curb Cuts 5210 Path Width 41.56 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 31.54.5 Security Level 51.57.5 Noise Level 414 TOTAL48

70. Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 821620 Curb Cuts 521020 Path Width 41.5615 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 31.54.515 Security Level 51.57.515 Noise Level 41410 TOTAL4895

71. Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

72. Walkability Worcester Polytechnic Institute72

73. Walkability Worcester Polytechnic Institute73 INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

74. Eliminating Curb Cuts X X X X 1 10 Walkability

75. Widening Sidewalks X X X X 1 10 Walkability

76. Buffer Between Pedestrians and Traffic X X X X 1 10 Walkability

77. Green Public Space Worcester Polytechnic Institute77

78. Green Public Space Worcester Polytechnic Institute78 INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Public Space Availability Accessibility Distance from location Park Amenities Security Level Noise Level Availability number feet 2 /person

79. Parks around Saint Michaels

80. Parks and City Owned Land

81. Possible Addition of City Parks 1 10 Community Space Availability

82. Vehicular Mobility Worcester Polytechnic Institute82

83. Vehicular Mobility Worcester Polytechnic Institute83 INDICATORS Walkability Public Space Availability Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Vehicular Mobility Level of service Safety Level

84. Current Levels of Service 1 10 Intersection # 1 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 3 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 4 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 2 Mobility 24 0 Hours Time of Day: 1 2 3 4 8:00 AM 5:00 PM 11:00 PM

85. Business Vitality Worcester Polytechnic Institute85

86. Business Vitality Worcester Polytechnic Institute86 INDICATORS Walkability Public Space Availability Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Business Vitality Number of Businesses Number of Each Type