1. WP3 plenary meeting London, Jan 17-18, 2006 Status of the Virtual Institute Marco Danelutto Workpackage leader University of Pisa - Italy

2. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 2 Contents Results of the review meeting Status of the Virtual Institute activities Outline of the meeting

3. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 3 Contents Results of the review meeting Status of the Virtual Institute activities Outline of the meeting

4. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 4 Results of the review meeting Technical and competent reviewers Stefano CampadelloNokia research, Finland Alexander SchillDresden Univ. of Technology, Germany Michael Hoevenaars ING, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Erich Schikuta University of Vienna, Austria Alfred GeigerT-Systems, Germany “Quite interactive” review process WP3 presentation (as of slides sent) –Objectives (tasks) –Roadmap (D.PM.01) –Partners (composition, dynamics) –Results (sample) –Integration activities (visits, workshops) –Extra (projects, conferences, etc.)

5. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 5 Main observations (WP3) 1.Relationship with “the rest of the world” 1.How do you position? Which kind of interaction? 2.Reference/prototype implementation needed 1.A: need fundings! 3.Security !!! 4.Industry 1.Excellence => fundings and industry interaction 2.Industry interaction must be strengthened

6. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 6 Main answers We are taking into account previous / concurrent experiences –(also as recommended from SAB 05 in Barcelona) Security is (to be) one of the research groups –Task force vs. horizontal task even in WP3 Industry –We should do better Reference implementation –Forthcoming (hopefully) –Lightweight specification for openness

7. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 7 Review: next JPA JPA presented –evolution of JPA1 –Continuity + research groups (named themes …) –More focused research topics –Involvement in standardization bodies Observations –Standardization bodies participation NEEDED! –More “critic” deliverables, outlining differences with the existing –Fundamental M30 (all partners using GCM or distinguishing activities w.r.t. GCM) !!!

8. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 8 Personal comments Good referee process –Better than expected ! Nice interaction with referees and officers No major comments to wp3 –But the ones we already know! Needed a better coordination between partners –Review result of part of us Needed more activity on common tasks –Some comments may be avoided …

9. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 9 Contents Results of the review meeting Status of the Virtual Institute activities Outline of the meeting

10. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 10 Participants (dynamics) FHG left almost immediately (December 2004) due to financial / management problems UNCL left workpackage activities at the end of first year kind of “Microsoft effect” active participation in roadmap definition and in WP3 meetings 14 participants left ISTI/CNR, IC, INRIA, QUB, WWU Muenster, UCAM, UCHILE, UNIPASSAU, UNIPI, UOW, UPC, EIA-FR, VUA, VTT

11. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 11 Partner and first year activities

12. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 12 First year “financial” issues Most AC partners were unable to justify MM with hired people too small fundings too late hiring At the moment the underspent money is reported to the second year Situation *must* be corrected during the second year

13. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 13 Meetings Charleroi meeting first “de visu” meeting of all partners Jan 2004, Pisa meeting roadmap outlined Barcelona meeting (Jun 2005) Fractal and research groups Sophia Antipolis, Oct 2005 meeting first “explicit” Task 1.1 session D.PM.02 design session

14. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 14 Electronic meetings Decided in Barcelona No followup - collect addresses (chat, Skype, iChat, Messanger, …) on a private WEB page - exploit existing framework (EIA-FR Switch facilities tested (3 partners)) - spare “explorative” and finalization short visits

15. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 15 Web Site

16. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 16 Web site (2)

17. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 17 Short visits Quite a large number 20 during the first year Involving 11 of 14 partners Main integration tool Need to be enhanced Web site with the one page report ! almost nobody is submitting such info ---> wiki? Inactive partners (!)

18. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 18 Fellowships Fellow: Marcelo Pasin (full WP3 fellowship) Subject: Object oriented environment for HPC applications on the GRID First institute: Haute Ecole Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale with Pierre Kuonen Second institute: University of Pisa with Marco Danelutto Duration: 14 months Fellow: Nikolaos Parlavantzas (Joint fellowship WP7 WP3) Subject: Dynamic software components composition in GRID environments First institute: University of Westminster with Vladimir Getov Second institute: INRIA with Denis Caromel Duration: 18 months Fellow: Catalin Dumitrescu (Joint fellowship WP3 WP6) Subject: Scheduling algorithms for higher-order components on the GRID First institute: University of Delft Second institute: University of Muenster Duration: 18 months

19. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 19 Technical Reports Currently TR-0001 Optimization Techniques for Implementing Parallel Skeletons in Distributed Environments TR-0002 Behavior Customization of Parallel Components for Grid Application Programming TR-0007 Characterization of the performance of ASSIST programs TR-0014 Parallel program/component adaptivity management TR-0016 Automatic mapping of ASSIST applications using process algebra Are from WP3 (5 out of 17) All papers submitted (joint ones) should become TR !!!

20. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 20 Pubblications About 20 publications by single partners related to topics of the Programming model Virtual institute About 15 joint publications by partners of the Virtual institute Startup –more activity expected while going on –as effect of achieved integration

21. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 21 Publication data base Thierry’s email last week SAB recommedation All partners must contribute Useful tool for Integration and Advertisement! Bibtex and PDF needed

22. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 22 JPA2: MM

23. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 23 JPA2: deliverables Some committments here - workshop at M30

24. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 24 JPA2: milestones

25. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 25 JPA2: research groups (1) Programming models for the single component which are the more suitable programming models that can be exploited in the implementation of a single component Communications (inter and intra component) point to point and collective communication implementation and optimisation Primitive component definition mechanisms and formalisms to be used to define a component Hierarchical component composition all the details related to the definition of new components out of the composition of existing ones Advanced programming models new programming models that offer the programmer more advanced tools and higher level mechanisms to implement grid applications on top of the component model

26. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 26 JPA2: research groups (2) Performance models the possibility to model the behaviour of component execution in such a way unexpected behavior can be discovered by monitoring execution parameters and comparing the measured parameters with the theoretically predicted ones Adaptivity all those techniques that can be used to automatically/autonomically adapt component behavior to grid changing features (faulty nodes and links, varying loads, unpredictable hot spots, etc.) Component run time support concerning the features/mechanisms needed to run components on grids as well as the (optimized) run time systems supporting component execution Component semantics concerning all the aspects related to the definition of formal and informal component and component compositions semantics Interoperability that is all the problems related to the possibility to run component programs interacting constructively with non component software built according to existing grid standards as well as with component software developed according to different component models

27. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 27 JPA2: research groups Security not in the JPA (fault !) but we *must* take it into account Interaction with other CoreGRID work packages aimed at providing the other CoreGRID work packages with the results produced within WP3 by the research groups listed above and gathering requisites/requirements and suggestions from the other work packages, in particular from those that will eventually use the GCM or implement the Grid platforms aimed at supporting GCM. Within the M13 – M30 period, close interaction is expected with the other CoreGRID work packages so that both those institutes will consider using GCM in their specific activities. WP3 will also benefit from the suggestions/requirements coming from those work packages while refining/developing the GCM. o Interaction with national/international standard institutes/committees aimed at promoting the results achieved within WP3 at different levels. We expect that during the M13 – M30 period the partners of WP3 will start participating in such institutes/committees activities and that partners of CoreGRID WP3 will participate in committees designing/defining new research frameworks at both national and international level.

28. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 28 Research groups Responsibles needed Proposal: if no resp. and/or no participants >>>> remove (JPA2?) Programming models of single component(EIA-FR) Communications(WWU-Muenster) Primitive component definition(INRIA/OASIS+IRISA) Hierarchical component definition(INRIA/OASIS) Advanced programming models(UPC,UNIPI) Performance models(ISTI/CNR) Adaptivity(UNIPI,INRIA/IRISA) Component run time support(VUA) Component semantics(INRIA/OASIS) Interoperability(UOW) Security(UCHILE) Interaction with other VI Standards

29. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 29 Projects (new ones!) One proposal in call 5 (sep05) (no news as of today, still waiting) GridCOMP STREP (INRIA leader, UNIPI, UOW, ISTI/CNR + … ) provide reference/prototype implementation of GCM as of D.PM.02 on top of existing, open source middleware DFG research action proposed: MetaGrid: Metadata and Metaprogramming for the Grid. German joint research action (DFG-Schwerpunktprogramm). Funding for 20+ researchers, 6 years, ~9M EUR, granting decision expected in May 2006. Interaction with CoreGRID planned, WP3 initiators: UNIPASSAU, WWU Muenster, ZIB (plus four others).

30. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 30 Positioning w.r.t. NGG reports (1&2) Software view (with implications for architecture and user view) addressing: Programming grid through abstractions GCM combines parallel & distributed programming practices in a coherent way Invisible grid scenario GCM implementation encapsulates all grid related concerns dynamicity & heterogeneity handling, middleware interface, resource discovery & management, … Self-* issues targeted in the run time support / component framework Currently going to be addressed Relationships/requirements on Network Centric OS which features can be moved to OS ?

31. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 31 Positioning w.r.t. NGG3 (SOKUs) NGG3 public in this period moving from services to SOKUs (Service Oriented Knoweldge Utilities) Still central point (research issue) raising the level of abstraction (programming environments) Comment from a referee: “what if components are no more trendy?”

32. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 32 Contents Results of the review meeting Status of the Virtual Institute activities Outline of the meeting

33. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 33 Program

34. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 34 Program Wednesday, January 18th 9.00 - 9.30 Status of the Institute Danelutto 9.30 - 11.00 GCM D.PM.02Henrio 11.00 - 11.30 Coffe break 11.30 - 12.30 Discussion on GCM deliverableAll participants 12.30 - 14.30 Lunch 14.30 - 15.00 Roadmap 1.0 (D.PM.01) Danelutto 15.00 - 16.00 Roadmap 2.0: general discussionAll participants 16.00 - 16.30 Coffe break 16.30 - 18.00 Roadmap 2.0: discussion and assessment All participants Thursday, January 19th 9.00 - 13.00Presentation of partner's current activity (10-20 min each) All participants

35. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 35

36. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies Programming Model Virtual institute 36