Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI."— Presentation transcript:

1 Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

2 Hα emission from the shock front Non-radiative shocks: primarily Hα emission from the immediate shock front Radiative shocks: show O III, N II, S II etc from recombination zone downstream Raymond et al. 2003, ApJ 584, 770 Cygnus Loop

3 Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888 HH broad H  narrow H  HH HH HH Hα narrow and broad components

4 Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888 HH broad H  narrow H  HH HH HH Hα narrow and broad components

5 Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888 broad H  narrow H  HH HH HH Hα narrow and broad components neutral H entering the shock: excited by electrons or protons, emits narrow Hα charge exchanges with shock heated protons creating hot neutrals that emit broad Hα V FWHM, broad → T p I B /I N → σ x, σ i → T e, T p (Chevalier, Kirshner & Raymond 1980 ApJ 235, 186)

6 T e /T p = 0.1 T e /T p = 0.5 T e /T p = 1.0 I B /I N (v shock, T e /T p ) van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3 optically thick Lyman α v shock = 635 km s -1 Ghavamian et al. 2001 ApJ 547, 995 electron impact excitation and ionization are peaked functions of T e decreasing charge exchange at high velocities

7 V FWHM,broad (T e /T p, v shock ) van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3 At high v shock most protons are too fast to charge exchange, limiting further broadening.

8 M A for 3  G 10 5 K 1cm -3 50% neutral gas (T e /T p ) 0  (1/v s 2 ) T p  v s 2 T e =constant Ghavamian, Laming & Rakowski, 2007 ApJ 654, L69 Results from Hα observations of Supernova Remnants

9 more sophisticated treatment of post-charge exchange distribution functions van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3

10 cosmic ray lower hybrid waves upstream rest frame vsvs k || 2 / k  2  m e /m p B v group   v s v phase 2=e p2=e p (  e,p  eB/m e,p c) L~  /v s t=  /v s 2 m e v e 2 = m e D || t D ||  Bv s 2 (E 2 ) m e v e 2  B    1/B heating independent of both v s and B! 1 ─── 2 e ─ p+p+ Ghavamian, Laming, & Rakowski 2007 Figure 2

11 T e /T p  v 2 shock, T e constant? Lower hybrid waves (LHW) in a cosmic ray (CR) precursor CR diffusion length scale for heating, and LHW v group  v shock allows T e independent of v shock and B. LHW growth requires some B  w.r.t shock normal. If B  generated by B-field amplification, then at M A = 60 ---12, LHW growth will exceed modified Alfvén wave growth. Ghavamian, Laming & Rakowski, 2007 ApJ 654, L69 (first estimates) Rakowski, Laming & Ghavamian 2008 ApJ 684, 348 (kinetic growth rate)

12 extra slides

13 DEM L71, new long-slit spectra confirm I B /I N too low in most regions to be matched by current models. We suspect H is being ionized and excited by hot electrons in the CR precursor

14 Growth Rate Comparison lower hybrid wave kinetic growth rate non-resonant modified Alfvén wave growth rate maximum Alfvén wave growth rate Mach number at which lower-hybrid waves grow faster than modified Alfvén waves for  shocks:

15 Cosmic-ray precursor non-resonant modified Alfvén waves amplify B  M A decreases near shock lower-hybrid wave growth takes over, heating the resonant electrons parallel perpendicular Figure 3

16 Solar Wind Shocks interplanetary bow shocks in the solar wind show a relationship closer to T e /T p  1/v. this could be explained if the cosmic rays were non- relativistic picking up an extra factor of v s /c in the diffusion coefficient. Figure 4 data from Schwartz et al 1986

17 Ultimate Goal: detect SEPs by their effect on thermal electrons Multi-slit instantaneous EUV/UV Spectra 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.7 Mission Concept: see poster Newmark et al. SP43A-07

18 Ultimate Goal: detect SEPs by their effect on thermal electrons Predicting ground-level SEP events Primary mission, detect seed particles prior to CME eruption available for acceleration to high energy SEPs Simultaneously the O VI and He II lines can be modeled to determine the electron to ion temperature ratio to test for rapid electron heating indicative (under our model) of SEP generated lower-hybrid waves Chianti simulated SOCS spectra UVCS spectrum from Raymond et al 2000, sees wings from shock heated ions

19 DEM L71, new long-slit spectra confirm I B /I N too low in most regions to be matched by current models. We suspect H is being ionized and excited by hot electrons in the CR precursor


Download ppt "Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google