1. Principles of Epidemiology
Chapter 4
Principles of Epidemiology
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

2. Learning Objectives Define epidemiology.
Describe various vital statistics used by epidemiologists to monitor a population’s health status.
Explain prevalence rates and how they differ from incidence rates.
Describe the strengths and weaknesses of various types of epidemiologic studies.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

3. Learning Objectives
Explain why the day-to-day variation in an individual’s nutrient intake can have important implications for nutritional epidemiologic studies.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various dietary assessment methods.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

4. Introduction Epidemiology is the study of epidemics.
The epidemiologic method was initially used to investigate, control, and prevent epidemics of infectious disease.
Today, it is also applied to the study of injuries, chronic disease, and social problems.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

5. The Practice of Epidemiology
The discipline of epidemiology is similar to clinical medicine and laboratory science in its concern with understanding the processes of health and disease in humans.
It differs from these disciplines in its focus on health problems of populations rather than of individual patients.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

6. The Practice of Epidemiology
Epidemiology - the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states and events in specified populations and the application of this study to the control of health problems.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

7. The Practice of Epidemiology
Distribution refers to the relationship between the health problem and the population in which it exists and it includes:
The persons affected.
The place and time of the occurrence.
Patient parameters such as age, sex, race, occupation, income and educational levels, and social and environmental features.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

8. The Practice of Epidemiology
Determinants refer to the causes and factors that affect the risk of disease and these are typically divided into two groups:
Host factors such as age, sex, race, nutrition status, and physiologic state, which determine an individual’s susceptibility to disease.
Environmental factors, such as living conditions, occupation, geographical location, and lifestyle, which determine the host’s exposure to a specific agent.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

9. The Practice of Epidemiology
Investigating Causes of Diseases
Examining a Community’s Health Status
Epidemiology can be used to describe a community’s particular health problems and to determine where its overall health is improving or getting worse.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

10. The Practice of Epidemiology
Investigating Causes of Diseases
Surveillance and Related Activities
Public health data have also been used to develop surveillance methods for identifying women at high risk for giving birth to a child with fetal alcohol syndrome and to design and implement prevention activities.
Based on vital statistics, such as age at death and cause of death, recorded on death certificates, the epidemiologic method can also be used to calculate an individual’s risk of dying before a certain age.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

11. % of Pregnant Women 18-44 Reporting Alcohol Use (1991-1999)
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

12. Example of Targeted Media Campaign: Alcohol Use in Pregnancy
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

13. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts
Basic concepts include:
Rates and risks
Epidemiologic method
Hypothesis testing
Explaining research observations
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

14. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

15. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Rates and Risks
The basic operation of the epidemiologist is to count cases and measure the population in which they arise in order to calculate rates of occurrence of a health problem and compare the rates in different groups of people.
The primary goal is to control and prevent these health problems, typically through the formulation of specific health policies.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

16. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Rates and Risks
In epidemiology, a case is a particular instance of a disease or outcome of interest.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

17. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Rates and Risks
Risk refers to the likelihood that people who are without a disease, but exposed to certain risk factors, will acquire the disease at some point in their lives.
Risk factors may be found in the physical environment or social environment, or they may be inherited.
Other risk factors may be behavioral, such as smoking.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

18. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Rates and Risks
An expression of how frequently a disease occurs in a population is called incidence, defined as the proportion of group initially free of a disease that develops the disease over a period of time.
Another common method of frequency of occurrence of an event is prevalence, or the proportion of a group possessing a disease at a specific time.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

19. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Epidemiologic Method
The epidemiologic method uses a variety of tools and incorporates a rigorous, scientific approach that includes the following steps:
Observing
Counting cases or events
Relating cases or events to the population at risk
Making comparisons
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

20. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Epidemiologic Method
Steps in epidemiologic method (continued):
Developing the hypothesis
Testing the hypothesis
Drawing scientific inferences
Conducting experimental studies
Intervening and evaluating
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

21. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

22. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Hypothesis Testing
The importance of hypothesis testing in the epidemiologic method cannot be understated.
The investigator identifies a cause-effect comparison to be tested as the research hypothesis.
The statement of a clear, precise hypothesis at the study outset ensures that the appropriate data are collected to answer the research question and avoids the pitfall of drawing spurious conclusions from the data set.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

23. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

24. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Hypothesis Testing
An important aspect of the epidemiologic method is determining whether the data are valid, which is whether the data represent the true state of affairs.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

25. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Explaining Research Observations
Research data can have three possible explanations:
The results of the study are incorrect because they are biased
The results are due simply to chance and do not represent the true state of affairs
The study results represent the truth
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

26. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Explaining Research Observations
Different types of bias include:
Selection bias (participants were self-selected)
Measurement bias (an error in measuring one or more of the outcome variables)
Confounding bias (confounding factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, dietary or lifestyle factors that make it difficult to distinguish between a response to treatment versus some other factor)
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

27. Basic Epidemiologic Concepts – Explaining Research Observations
To say that the data are valid means that they are neither biased nor incorrect due to chance and that they represent the true state of affairs.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

28. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Ecological or Correlational Studies
Compare the frequency of events in different populations with the per capita consumption of certain dietary factors.
Dietary data collected in this type of study are usually disappearance data, which are the figures for food produced for human consumption minus the food that is exported, fed to animals, wasted, or otherwise not available for human consumption.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

29. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Ecological or Correlational Studies (continued)
Data from ecological studies cannot be used to draw conclusions about the role of foods or nutrients in the development of specific diseases, but they can be used to generate hypotheses which can then be tested with a more rigorous study design.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

30. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Cross-sectional or Prevalence Studies
Examine the relationships among dietary intake, diseases, and other variables as they exist in populations at a particular time.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

31. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Cohort Studies
Are like moving pictures of events occurring within populations.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

32. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Cohort Studies (continued)
A group of people, called a cohort, free from the disease is identified and examined, and then followed for months or even years
Group members are examined periodically to determine which individuals develop the characteristics of interest and which do not.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

33. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Cohort studies may be either:
Retrospective, those that look back in time to reconstruct exposures and health outcomes, or
Prospective, those that follow a group into the future.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

34. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Case-Control Studies
A group of persons with the disease is compared with a group of persons without the disease to compare characteristics, such as previous exposure to a factor, between cases and controls.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

35. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

36. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
Controlled Trials
The most rigorous evaluation of a dietary hypothesis is the randomized controlled trial conducted as a double-blind experiment.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

37. Nutritional Epidemiology
The epidemiologic method lends itself to the study of the relationship of diet to health and disease.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

38. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

39. Nutritional Epidemiology
The method can also be used to:
Describe the nutrition status of populations or specific subgroups of a population and develop specific programs or services for members of the group whose nutrition status appears to be compromised.
Evaluate nutrition interventions.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

40. Nutritional Epidemiology
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Source of information on behaviors that increase the risk for chronic disease
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)
Source of information on the prevalence of health risk behaviors among young people
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

41. Nutritional Epidemiology
The Nature of Dietary Variation
One challenge to the study of the relationship of diet to disease is the nature of dietary variation and the complexity of our diets.
Foods we consume each day are complex mixtures of chemicals, some of which are known to be important to human health while others have not even been identified or measured.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

42. Nutritional Epidemiology
The Nature of Dietary Variation (cont.)
Intake from vitamin supplements and other sources must also be considered.
The primary factor of interest is the long-term dietary intake of foods, which is more important than short-term dietary intake in the development of many diseases, which take years or a lifetime to develop.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

43. Nutritional Epidemiology
The Nature of Dietary Variation (cont.)
People do not eat the same foods every day and nutrient intake varies from day to day, yet it is difficult to determine the number of days of food intake records needed to estimate the true average intake of a small number of adults.
If only one day’s intake is determined, then the true long-term nutrient intake may be misrepresented.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

44. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

45. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

46. Nutritional Epidemiology
The Nature of Dietary Variation (cont.)
A variety of methods are available for estimating dietary intake but none of the methods are perfect.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

47. Nutritional Epidemiology
Food Consumption at the National Level
The primary method of assessing the available food supply at the national level is based on food balance sheets and these results in a per capita figure.
Food balance sheets are affected by errors that arise in calculating production, waste, and consumption.
They are not used to describe nutritional inadequacies but are used to formulate agricultural policies.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

48. Nutritional Epidemiology
Food Consumption at the Household Level
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

49. Nutritional Epidemiology
Food Consumption by Individuals
Food consumption by individuals can be measured by using:
A food consumption survey
Diet history
24-hour recall
Food record
Food frequency questionnaire
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

50. Epidemiology and the Community Nutritionist
Epidemiology is essential to the delivery of effective nutrition programs and services.
The key roles of the community nutritionist include identifying nutritional problems within the community and interpreting the scientific literature.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

51. Epidemiology and the Community Nutritionist
The community nutritionist must be able to critically evaluate the scientific literature before formulating new nutrition policies or altering eating pattern messages.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

52. Epidemiology and the Community Nutritionist
Certain elements can be used in judging the strength of epidemiologic association, and interpreting epidemiologic data basically involves two steps:
Evaluate the criterion for a causal association carefully.
Assess the causal association critically for the presence of bias and the contribution of chance.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

53. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

54. Epidemiology and the Community Nutritionist
Competence in this area is achieved by experience and determination.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

55. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
Ten Good Arguments for Reading Journals*
To impress others
To keep abreast of professional news
To understand pathophysiology
To find out how a seasoned health practitioner handles a particular problem
To find out whether to use a new or an existing diagnostic test, survey instrument, or educational tool with your patients or clients
*D. L. Sackett,How to read clinical journals. I. Why to read them and how to start reading them critically, CMA Journal 124 (1981): 555–58.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

56. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
Ten Good Arguments for Reading Journals
To learn the clinical features and course of a disorder
To determine etiology or causation
To distinguish useful from useless or even harmful therapy
To sort out claims concerning the need for and the use, quality, and cost-effectiveness of clinical and other health care
To be titillated by the letters to the editor
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

57. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
Which Journals Should You Read?
Nutrition Journals
Nutrition Newsletters
Specialty Journals
Other Publications
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

58. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
How to Get the Most Out of a Journal
Scan the table of contents
Check the professional updates and news features
In choosing articles for in-depth reading, be selective and discriminating
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

59. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
How to Tease Apart an Article
Abstract or summary - Provides an overview of the study, highlights the results, and indicates the study’s significance.
Introduction - Presents background information.
Methods - Describes the study design, selection of subjects, methods of measurement, specific hypotheses to be tested, and analytical techniques.
Results - Details the study’s outcomes.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth

60. The Well-Read Community Nutritionist
How to Tease Apart an Article (cont.)
Discussion - Provides an analysis of the meaning of the findings and compares the study’s findings with those of other researchers.
Conclusions/implications - A short section that summarizes the findings or considers how the study results can be applied to practice.
References/bibliography
What Else Should You Read?
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth