1. Networking European Digital Repositories

2. What to Network?

3. Researchers generate knowledge This is going to become an amazing paper I only hope I will be able to access it

4. Knowledge is wrapped in publications …

5. Publications in research … … … … … … … publicize  search & retrieve …  …  write review …   read print …   cite  research

6. But we have a „full-text-problem“ Most research institutions cannot afford –25.000 peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings –2.500.000 publications annually Researchers have an access problem –Efficiency of work is affected –Use and Impact is suboptimal

7. 2 (or 3) solutions proposed Publish in open eJournals –“golden road” Archive in Repositories –“green road” Long-term vision –open system for research output

8. 2 (or 3) solutions proposed Publish in open eJournals –“golden road” Archive in Repositories –“green road” Long-term vision –open system for research output You are here!

9. repository network „recipe“

10. All publications in a repository …………………

11. Aggregate with OAI-PMH Aggregator OAI-PMH

12. Feed back to research Aggregator OAI-PMH search engine

13. Lift to an international scale Aggregator … … search engine

14. Mission accomplished?

15. Full text problem is not solved Researchers do not retrieve enough full-texts Organizational dimension Technical dimension

16. Organizational dimension Repositories are not sufficiently filled Advocacy and Awareness-Raising –Motivate researchers to populate repositories –Motivate institutional managers to mandate –Motivate policy makers to support –Motivate operators to curate data –Motivate developers to improve standards

17. Technical dimension Building of Aggregations is not trivial! Implementation Variability –Full-text not homogeneously offered metadata only, jump-off pages, authorization full-text URLs in varying locations Architectural Variability –Local harvesting vs. aggregated harvesting –Multiple service providers not complementary Google-Scholar, Oaister, BASE or citebase

18. DRIVER Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research

19. DRIVER-I objectives “Step one towards a pan-European infrastructure for digital repositories” DRIVER-I is a test-bed for a –Organizational Framework –Data infrastructure –Software infrastructure >> contribute to solutions for full-text problems Organization Data Software

20. “Make it workable” Focus on existing repositories and services Focus on Institutional Repositories –Rapid progress over the last years –Inherent sustainability (e.g. libraries) –Adequate technical homogeneity (OAI-PMH) Focus on textual materials Focus on specific (test-bed) countries

21. Organizational Framework 5 Test-bed countries Very different –Repository landscapes –Technologies –National approaches –…

22. The Netherlands –National Federation –Aggregated Network –Sustainable Operation –“Cream of Science” >> Model for Distributed Network

23. Germany –National Policies –Pro-active, individual approach –High quality certificate >> Model for quality assurance

24. Great Britain –National federation –Advocacy focus –ROMEO IPR lookup –OpenDoar Registry >> Model for advocacy / added value services

25. France centralized scheme >> Model for centralized network

26. Belgium –2006 no national federation –13 Rectors signed Berlin Declaration >> Model for network construction

27. Full-Text-Guidelines as “glue” 60 “organized” Repositories Solutions for full-text –Support of “sets” –Clear location of URL –Resource harvesting Test-Validator Spanish Version of Guidelines >> http://www.driver-support.eu

28. DRIVER-I objectives “Step one towards a pan-European infrastructure for digital repositories” DRIVER-I is a test-bed for a –Data infrastructure –Organizational Framework Guidelines Organization Data Software

29. DRIVER-I objectives “Step one towards a pan-European infrastructure for digital repositories” DRIVER-I is a test-bed for a –Data infrastructure –Organizational Framework Guidelines –Software infrastructure Open Services Organization Data Software

30. An open pan-European software architecture

31. DRIVER-Software: Objectives An infrastructure-toolkit –Re-usable services and architecture –For Developers and information managers 1.Basic services (by DRIVER) 2.Special services (e.g. national, by 3 rd parties) Anwendungen –For end- users (e.g. Researchers) 1.Basic applications (e.g. search) 2.Value-added Services (e.g. citation analysis)

32. Software Infrastructure Test-Bed

33. … UK FR …DENLBE Aggregator Local Service National Service Intermediary Service Local Service Web-GUI data re-use web servicedeploy … more

34. „Human“ portal for access

35. Infrastructural Tools

36. Repository Landscape

37. Managing Aggregation

38. Test of Compliance

39. UI Index IS RS Search Service Infrastructure

40. Service Infrastructure: Future MS Index IS Aggregator MDStore Collection User Profile RS UI Search Community RS A&A

41. Italy System Manager orchestrating several distributed components

42. Poland Authorization and Authentication enabling personalized services

43. Germany Index services providing access to aggregated repository content

44. Greece Functionality Services for search and retrieval & Graphical User Interface University of Athens

45. DRIVER-I Summary Researchers need full-text access International cooperation needed Current repository system on the move But full-text access is hampered DRIVER tackles at European scale –Organizational framework –Data infrastructure –Software infrastructure

46. DRIVER-II Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research PHASE 2: 2008/2009

47. Organization –Building a Confederation of European Digital Repositories Data –Extending the virtual Information Space over multiple and heterogeneous repositories Software –Consolidating and enhancing the Infrastructure to operate a production quality system with advanced user functionalities DRIVER-II – Overall Goals Organization Data Software

48. Confederation for European Digital Repositories –Geographical Coverage – Liaison with relevant organizations Community Building –Identification & support of advocate networks across Europe – Promotion of services to service and data providers & repository users Studies –Usage of object descriptions for the representation, management and sharing of discipline specific data –Investigation of new technologies for future integration F DUK B NL ISIDKPL NORIRL E DRIVER-I Test-Bed EL P SFIN DRIVER-I partners DRIVER-II new partners Additional Partners IR Community LT DRIVER-II – Organization

49. DRIVER-II – Data DRIVER Information Space enhancement –Include additional, non-textual, types of resources –Extend the typology of repositories beyond those conforming to the OAI-PMH Object Model Focus on Enhanced Publications –Manage combined packages of textual resources with additional, interlinked material Complex Object Model Management –Extend the DRIVER Object model definition to describe the structure of Objects obeying to various Object Models

50. DRIVER-II – Software From testbed deployment to production-quality, full-scale system – Maintain and enhance the underlying system infrastructure – Adhere to continuous software development cycle Providing quality service operation and support to – Service providers with well defined APIs & documentation for two- sided application integration – Repository managers with feedback and tools Providing additional end-user related functionalities – Advanced resource discovery over heterogeneous types and formats of data – Enhanced community & personalized services – Advanced system performance

51. DRIVER-II – Process Networking DRIVER-I D-NET 1.0 F DUK B NL ISIDKPL NORIRL E DRIVER-I Test-Bed EL P SFIN DRIVER-I partners DRIVER-II new partners Additional Partners IR Community Month 6121824 Service D-NET 2.0 Service orchestration Data harmonization Organizational development, support and discovery ConsolidationInnovation LT test-bed organizational model Research

52. Finnish co-operation Goal –Delegate(s) in the Confederation Participation in meetings Feed back finnish experiences –Country Correspondent / Interface Describe national developements Help with national aggregation („guidelines“) (mentor other countries / repositories)

53. Thanks!