Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Active Suspension System Test Platform – Controls Advisor: Mr. Steven Gutschlag Presented: 29 April 2004 Project Member: Jerry L. Campbell Senior Presentation
2
Outline I. Project Overview II. Functional Description III. System Block Diagram IV. System Identification V. Plant Model VI. System Performance VII. Problems Encountered VIII. Future Work IX. Questions
3
Reliable Test Platform Digital Controller for DC Actuator Used by Future Bradley University Projects Overview
4
System InputsOutputs Desired Platform Motion (R)Actual Platform Motion (C) Note: Desired system response is C=R, or C/R = 1.0 EMAC Micropac 535 micro-controller based development board (Controller) InputsOutputs Keypad (Desired Platform Motion)Actuator Drive Signal Max. Platform Motion AmplitudeLCD Display Actuator (plant) InputsOutputs Error Signal from Controller Platform Movement Position Signal Disturbance Force (Load)
5
Modes of Operation Sinusoidal Step Triangular Note: Step and Triangle functions can be single or continuous
6
Software Initialization Flow Chart
7
Basic System Block Diagram Shown in a General Configuration Input Voltage Signal Representing the Desired Platform Motion ( Provided by the Micro-Controller ) Actuator Plant EMAC MicroPac 535 Development System Digital Controller Input Platform Motion
8
Detailed Spec Sheet Not Available Need Accurate Mathematical Model Obtained Via Frequency Response and Load vs. Speed Measurements System Identification Identification
9
Block Diagram of a Simple DC Machine ( Open Loop)
10
Sample Frequency Response Data Sample
11
10 0 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Frequency Response Actuator Velocity [dB] Applied Frequency [w] Red => Slope from pencil Line Blue=> Slope from Cursors
12
10 0 1 2 3 0 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 Frequency Response Actuator Velocity [dB] Applied Frequency [w] Red => Slope from pencil Line Blue=> Slope from Cursors -3dB point at ~ 42 rad/sec
13
10 0 1 2 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Applied Frequency (rad/sec) Phase (degrees) Phase (peak to inflection) VS. Frequency ~28
14
Preliminary Simulink Model for the Warner Linear Actuator Including Non-Linear Effects
15
Backlash Effects Input Position
16
Simplified Model Assumptions System is Linear Backlash Not Present Dead Band Not Present
17
Position Va Force (load) System Model Simplified System Model
18
Simplified System Simulink Model
19
PM Determination
20
Phase Margin Determination
21
Position Without Controller Position With Controller System Performance Lower Actuator Position Limit
22
Simplified System Simulink Model
23
Input K = 10 K = 80 K = 40 K = 20 System Performance Note: Backlash Effects Minimized as Gain Increases
24
System Step Response Input Position K = 40
25
Other Controller Options and Obstacles Integrator PI Controller
26
Problems Encountered Current Limiting Caused Inadequate Data Time Required for System Identification Insufficient Time Left to Implement Digital Control
27
Future Work Select Practical Hardware Micro-Controller Code Implement Digital Controller W/ EMAC Construct Test Platform
28
Questions
29
Questions
30
Questions
31
Lumped Parameter Model
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.